Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
06 Jul 13
14:37
Joined:
Date Joined:
26 Apr 12
Market has good reason to love Notts....They will have to get Mustard and Stokes and Posh Kid.....
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 34
|
By:
So a lay.....to begin...1.44....
|
|
By:
and 1.38
|
|
By:
and 1.35...stop...6/0...AFTER 2
|
|
By:
22/0....3
|
|
By:
48/1.....6....1.46 L O L
|
|
By:
can't blame the market for being pro notts. Lumb, Hales, Wessels, Taylor, Patel, Hussey - that's about as good as it gets batting wise domestically.
|
|
By:
Yes very true, hope for runs on the board though.Going well so far.
Nick Night predicts 175 every game.... |
|
By:
Knight...always wrong too..
|
|
By:
75/1....10...1.52
|
|
By:
looks like 150 tops. Won't be enough with their bowling attack/notts batting.
|
|
By:
154 final total. 15-20 short imo.
|
|
By:
Yes, frustrated by Hussey patel. I get a little red...missed 1.6 early on..
|
|
By:
Durham are screwed!
 |
|
By:
Notts price silly
|
|
By:
yes...it is low..i am not wanting to red, hope to lay low again..
|
|
By:
Lay them then trader! Thanks for your cash!
|
|
By:
Intriguing odds.
|
|
By:
1.14 requiring nearly 8 an over.
|
|
By:
you do have to question whether someone knows something on these. Yes, Notts have good batsmen, but even so the odds are all wrong, or probably correct because someone knows something.
|
|
By:
Very straight competition imho.
1.09 have that.. |
|
By:
if you're trading then perhaps short. They're surely not losing here though. Durham attack is pish and the notts batting is brilliant. Sunny day, pitch doing nothing, outfield decent enough, and already 47/0 after 5.
|
|
By:
We'll see if spin can make a difference.
|
|
By:
pi sh
|
|
By:
lol
|
|
By:
Shows how dim some of these Durham players are when they shout 'catch' while the ball is being hit along the ground.
|
|
By:
Virtually a non-contest. Someone knew.
|
|
By:
1.01 in 7 overs wow
|
|
By:
Someone knew Notts had a great line up, in fact the world and his wife knew...
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
Fielding placement seems to be all wrong.
|
|
By:
Yes should be row 9 instesd of 6..
|
|
By:
l o l..instead
|
|
By:
Anoter bag of old skool jelly babies devoured...must stop.
|
|
By:
poor Lumb, only 96, he is seething
|