Cricket
Apr 16, 2013 -- 1:09PM, teo813 wrote:
they only needed 6 runs per over with 8 wickets left and only 6-7 over left ffs, what the heck happened to them! I would normally cover the tie but who could see this!
I thought I covered the tie late. After the run out I think it was, yet still got 1.03.
muppet!
Apr 16, 2013 -- 1:12PM, GRANTCKING wrote:
lick my ballz david warner
Im sure he would if you returned the favour.
This just hasnt been worth the stress.
Apr 16, 2013 -- 1:17PM, ArmchairIdiot wrote:
Where's Sehwag?
he's working out how they have made an anagram of his name to produce 'we shag'
Apr 16, 2013 -- 1:22PM, joe39 wrote:
Know your rules - Betfair, runs win.Bookies, most sixes.
Super over should be match winner. But hey ho, somebody somewhere else thinks otherwise.
This market will be settled based on the number of runs scored by each team in the Super Over. Dead Heat rules apply.
Apr 16, 2013 -- 1:24PM, ClayDavis wrote:
what was the shortest price RCB went in normal play? Been watching it on sky+ and market is closed. cheers
1.01. Big style. Delhi highest price I think was 90s.
Apr 16, 2013 -- 4:08PM, Footiefan111 wrote:
i missed out on the action
Very Lucky!
Apr 16, 2013 -- 4:08PM, Footiefan111 wrote:
i missed out on the action
A long life's more important! Would you have lumped on RCB at 3.4 when they needed 6 runs from 5 balls, with 7 wkts down? I reckon you might have.... Or DD when RCB needed 12 from 6 with two mugs at the crease? 
Apr 17, 2013 -- 5:01AM, Footiefan111 wrote:
I don't think they are fixed you also get one sided matches in ipl
ok, then.
