Australia vs Sri Lanka 2nd T20

http://www.abc.net.au/sport/cricket/live-streaming/

they're doing live betting odds on a delayed telecast

Jan 28, 2013 -- 11:06AM, drever wrote:

someone was trying to lay completed match yes at 1.01-1.05!

mental.  Just missed that - shame.

shouldn't betfair have already settled the market in fact - thus bets might be void?

layed 2 quid at 1000's 'no' , only 2 quid , but hey

5 minutes til reductions apparantly?

Jan 28, 2013 -- 11:22AM, nicky27 wrote:

layed 2 quid at 1000's 'no' , only 2 quid , but hey

hmm.  free money

Isn't 5 overs a match?  So done deal?

Jan 28, 2013 -- 11:23AM, BJT wrote:

Isn't 5 overs a match?

yep.  Noticed Betfair don't always suspend the market immediately allowing free money occasionally

yes

must be losing overs now

so guys dont forget to lay srilanka nowwwwwwwww

micky arthur accidentally showed his hand there.

pretty clear that australia controlled that decision at sydney despite the thinly veiled innocence they tried at the time.

1.24 lay not good 4 me

i think it ll go down and then ll go up

Ground wet, comms calling 15-20 minutes.  Puts down 5 overs.

24 minutes max after that for game to happen, Aus 20 runs behind?

managed to get a lay at 1.2 there , couple of hits and this could be 1.5 plus in no time

My calc at 16 overs says 130 target?  Any takers?

17 overs 138
16 130
15 122

???

feels that aus can still win this

DL really is a crock of ****.  Can't stand it.  Waste of our money. 

Lay of SL here - agree with others

84 11 overs
94 12
103 13
113 14
122 15
130 16
138 17


???

This is crazy. Just play ffs

hope they get back out there soon

they'd be out there now were it not for clarke in sydney.

simple as that.

If this is going to be something like 5 more overs needing 60 odd, then it is game on

9 minutes my word is 15 over game.  So we are at 17 right now.

62 in 30 balls best case.
53/24 4 minutes after
43/18 4 minutes after
34/12 4 minutes after
25/6 4 minutes after that?

Longer it goes, SL gets shorter.  Think laying now is negligent.

ok, 15 overs game. 9 minutes we are playing

reluctant to play not reticent to play you facking clown allott.

1.27 layed plenty based on that information.  2 runs a ball, for 5 overs, 8 wickets.  Swing hard, swing long, buy me a new computer ffs ********s.

Australia will still need to hit a few out of the ground which won't be easy

Jan 28, 2013 -- 11:38AM, JustWinBaby wrote:

If this is going to be something like 5 more overs needing 60 odd, then it is game on

62 off 30 - not 1.22

malinga will only be able to bowl 1 more if its a 15 over game

SL has to be a lay now.

I HOPE NO ONES GONE TO AUSTRALIA FOR THEIR HOLIDAYS TODAY  IF ITS RAINING ,ESPECIALLY IF THEVE GONE ON A CARAVAN SITE

are they definitely coming back out? is that factored into current price(!)

Heard 15 over game.  If that is delayed, then I assume 15 overs is still good.

Let su hope the ball gets wet, hard to grip, pies a plenty.

They are walking out right now

62 off 30

12 runs an over

62 off 30.  Aussie Aussie Aussie.  Buy me a computer.

****s imo.... 

SRI LANKA GONE FROM 1.18 TO 1.33

good call bjt

they won't be able to let malinga get a soft over

No more rain, wickets unimportant.  Swing hard, swing long.

in sydney the umpires made the call not because it was going to be dangerous to the players but because they considered the wet outfield to present a disadvantage to the fielder side.

obviously tonight they don't think it does.

i have every sympathy with the lankans here. it's double standards and the selective interpretation could lead to them not winning a single limited overs competition against australia when they should have won both.

Yeah, but they got it wrong last time.  Shouldn't become the precedent.

MARSH my main man.

can marsh hit 27 in one over? today

Doesn't need to.

he nearly middled that

i agree entirely it was the wrong decision and that clarke was a massive **** for not going back out.

let's not pretend for a moment that it was a decision made without massive amounts of pressure from the australians.

so i'm entirely sympathetic with the sri lankan's not wanting to go out.

hes a lucky boy BJT

43/18

they need a huge over here, i'm talking 13+

30 off 2 would be a huge mountain imo

37/16

OH MY ****.  NOW THE ****G ABC HAVE GONE TO THE ****G NEWS?  ARE YOU ****G JOKING ME YOU IGNORANT **** ****?

malinga to bowl penultimate ?

that's world class death bowling

Take your word for it.  FFS

I'm sticking with SL but these odds are silly. Especially if the last over is spin.

mark nicholas doing his big gruff bear voice.

he's such a ****.

33/11

I am out.  Can't work under these conditions.  TV ****, "live" stream ****, "live" radion stream cuts to the ****g news?  **** me.

perera last over surely

22/7 1.15?  Please.

18/6 1.25?  Hmmm...  Certainly not value, but I think they do this.

Momentum, body language (in my vision anyway lol), says they smack **** out of it.

Marsh, my main man.  5 year contract on offer here.

whatever the outcome, this is grossly unfair on SL

there is no way they should be playing when in Sydney SL were denied what seemed a certain victory to wrap up the series and i'm not talking out of my wallet

For the sake of Australias future, do not let this goose win this game.

omg lucky

it was there to be hit

What an absolute **** of a way to make 100 bucks FFS.  Need a new hobby, this is ****g ridiculous.

Without the delay I reckon that would have been 4

good.

didn't deserve to lose that.

it's not the facking ashes maxwell.

get up and fack orf.

great finish

2-0 sri lanka !!

In Da House Maxwell   

Arent they poor losers? 

what the fcuk is aus prob???
every team takes time on the last ball if its the decider

ugly finish

Jaya getting heated at the handshakes there

wtf was wade having a go for Jayawadene when they were shaking hands?

Poor losers this Aussie bunch. **** off

No doubt my vision (later) will show SL taking its time to set the same field as the rest of the over.  Least of my worries.  At least Marsh made a score, not out, put them in a winning position, and Maxwell ddn't win the game for them.  Aussies future brighter.

Jan 28, 2013 -- 12:24PM, nicky27 wrote:

Jaya getting heated at the handshakes there

wasnt jaya, warner had something to say so jaya gave it back

was a bit naive to not put a fielder on the point boundary , especially as the last 2 deliveries went for 44444 there and Perera bowls full and wide out side off inviting the same shot ...maxwell was unlucky not to repeat the dose there and hit 3 consecutive 444444's in the same area

was the first thought for the crowd in sydney mark?

the facking hypocrisy.

odd seeing a handful of state cricketers having a go at one of the greats of the game.

Stupid more like it

stupidity

Maxwell had no right to tell them to hurry up and bowl, if he was in their situation he would of taken the same approach

He had every right to tell them to hurry up, just as they had every right to tell him where to stick it.

Gotta say, and I can't speak for everyone, but this Aussie side is definitely unlikable. It lacks the character of yesteryear, not to mention the skills, and the lads rarely behave in a way that does us proud.

It's easy to see why non-Aussies like watching us lose

I'm sure they are all hanging out in the change rooms now.

SL definitely deserved to win. They were on the wrong end of everything, wet ground aside. The reduced chase favored aus and Marsh was out in the first over.

who the fark is maxwell to be saying that?
that's what i kept saying to my brother when watching this.
jaya is a HOF cricketer. top of the roast. the highest blend. maxwell is instant coffee.
aussie cricket team is making me feel unaustralian.....

I dint follow this game nor see any footage, but the behaviour of the aussies was a fkin disgrac.

e at the end.

Agree...fancy waiting 5 minutes before facing up