Cricket
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
SA to short here? 1.37...
Show More
Could be sitting pretty if not for Mac, still i wont be far out with my 240.....
Plenty said never get 200.
Still not sure where the value might be tho.....yet...anyone...
Could be with Kiwi....poss...
Plenty said never get 200.
Still not sure where the value might be tho.....yet...anyone...
Could be with Kiwi....poss...
Only 7/8 ticks for that wicket...so someone thinks score is near a game...assuming they complete...
Are there any consequences for not keeping up with the over rate?
Cant se SA winning, 1.47 looks afair lay, and would go in again if they got good start after 5/6/7/8 overs
meo - the captain can be fined or banned for a match or 2.
Today's captain is in the role because AB de Villiers, the usual skipper, is banned for slow over rates!
In T20 cricket, the punishment can be 6 runs per over not bowled by a certain time. Why that doesn't apply in ODIs is baffling.
Today's captain is in the role because AB de Villiers, the usual skipper, is banned for slow over rates!
In T20 cricket, the punishment can be 6 runs per over not bowled by a certain time. Why that doesn't apply in ODIs is baffling.
this de Kock plays with fear in his eyes. Would much rather be with SA if he goes early at a better price.
It's a big wicket Max while they are not getting away....
this is shocking bowling to a field from both Mills and McClenaghan.
nothing wrong with cutting through point and driving through the leg side line is awful bowling with such scant protection.
nothing wrong with cutting through point and driving through the leg side line is awful bowling with such scant protection.
Hope it dont train,just feel a breakthrough could bring more.
why the **** will SA panic at this RR? its a stroll so far
de Kock is a frightening talent.
Could be anything he wants.
Could be anything he wants.
One would think so but i shall keep my Kiwi green a little longer.
Got a funny feeling that SA are going to bottle this....again.
split green now....slipping away...2 wickets needed....might nibble more at lesser odds..
2nd odi saffer were 100/1 after 20...now in 3rd they are 99/1...target difference is 19 runs...
if they go for straight win from here,,then what were the problem with then in 2nd odi
wicket is taking some turn,,williamson should be handy on this
calm down mugs
it's GSM SOUTH AFRICA here
there is no doubt , take what u can .
it's GSM SOUTH AFRICA here
there is no doubt , take what u can .
McCullum - super chump. What a complete @rsehole.
actually 13 actor are playing in the ground 11 in fielding side and 2 batsmen on the crease
this SA batting team without Amla, Kallis and V are very brittle.
I kept green from while back...Any one traded the wickets must have major grin.
how would have thought this was going all the way, when NZ in a mess earlier, thats why cricket's so good for trading
NZ odds against till the last ball, has that ever happened before??
ffs,,raxcing football and now fecking cricket,,ffs just cant get a fecking winner
Very poor last bowl by Franklin. You just knew he was going to fluff his line
threw away over half my SA green then, but had to cover all 3 outcomes, got greedy and fecked it up last game, wasn't making same mistake twice
SUMMIT ELSE.....wot sort of last ball was that....he needed a boundary....unreal...short...but wide...
NZ looked nailed on at least to get a DRAW with 1 ball left.
one of the worst last balls in the history of one dayers
Not Franklin's fault you all lost your money. Nothing wrong with that last ball, if it wasn't for him NZ wouldn't have been in this match (or either of the first two matches)
Just shows why this forum is terrible nowadays
Just shows why this forum is terrible nowadays
no. it's about bowling where the batsman doesn't expect it. you don't want to bowl a yorker as that's where McLaren was expecting it and is ready to paddle it down to the boundary.
there's only one person to blame for you losing your money (and why you probably lose regularly), and it's not James Franklin
there's only one person to blame for you losing your money (and why you probably lose regularly), and it's not James Franklin
cnman - ur talking nonsense. No one is slating him for his previous plays. The last BALL was BRUTAL. Fook sake man a 6 came of it. How is that NOT a bad bowl? Pleae explain how it could not have been a bad bowl when a boundary comes of it. I won £1k on SA with 3K off the NZ.
a 6 coming off it isn't any different to a 4 though is it in this situation? it's not relevant whether it goes for a 4 or 6. just because a ball goes for 6 that doesn't mean it's a bad ball. a back of a length ball was the right-decision there, it just didn't come off that time.
if he'd tried to bowl a yorker and got it slightly wrong and it was a full-toss that got hit for 4 everyone would've blamed him
if he'd bowled a length ball and it got smashed over cow-corner for 6 everyone would've blamed him.
he very nearly defended 8 off the last over, which is very difficult to do.
at the end of the day people on here can't blame themselves for losing money, and that's why they continue to do so rather than give up. It's because of people like that that the good posters have left this forum and use twitter instead
if he'd tried to bowl a yorker and got it slightly wrong and it was a full-toss that got hit for 4 everyone would've blamed him
if he'd bowled a length ball and it got smashed over cow-corner for 6 everyone would've blamed him.
he very nearly defended 8 off the last over, which is very difficult to do.
at the end of the day people on here can't blame themselves for losing money, and that's why they continue to do so rather than give up. It's because of people like that that the good posters have left this forum and use twitter instead
i don't think it was the best ball he could have bowled given that south africa realistically needed a boundary to win. a full wide yorker or a wide slower ball bouncer would have been better imho, but it wasn't a terrible idea: you're expecting it to be cut and you've got protection. regardless, it was good batting from mclaren.
you're of course right that if either of the two suggestions i put forward aren't executed properly there's the risk they can go as well.
if you wanted to pick out some dumb bowling, McClenaghan's bowling to smith at the start and a bits at the death (bouncing Kleinveldt with fine leg inside the circle) gets the award
you're of course right that if either of the two suggestions i put forward aren't executed properly there's the risk they can go as well.
if you wanted to pick out some dumb bowling, McClenaghan's bowling to smith at the start and a bits at the death (bouncing Kleinveldt with fine leg inside the circle) gets the award
A straight up bouncer not wide would have been my choice. Thats sport folks.
in my one and only game of cricket...a t20 match played on the oval, i got hit for 6 off the last ball when the opps needed 4to win off the last ball.... I was gutted.
g.Hick had just retired 25* not out 4 balls into the over, next ball i took my first ever wicket with a ball i managed to york the number 11 and i celebrated afridi style.
(hands up in the air / not the moonwalk on a good length)
in walked their number 1 already 25*, i touched the pitch warne like, asked the umps what would croft do and was told ..bowl a slow one. I did and went catch it... catch it...catch it in the crowd. and that was that. Then i had to do an interview for betfair totally dejected. Geraint jones tryed to cheer us up but i was so down. lol.. great day tho.
and makes me laugh now, everytime one of these pro's gets knocked for a six last ball to decide the match. have a little thought of that match.
g.Hick had just retired 25* not out 4 balls into the over, next ball i took my first ever wicket with a ball i managed to york the number 11 and i celebrated afridi style.
(hands up in the air / not the moonwalk on a good length)in walked their number 1 already 25*, i touched the pitch warne like, asked the umps what would croft do and was told ..bowl a slow one. I did and went catch it... catch it...catch it in the crowd. and that was that. Then i had to do an interview for betfair totally dejected. Geraint jones tryed to cheer us up but i was so down. lol.. great day tho.
and makes me laugh now, everytime one of these pro's gets knocked for a six last ball to decide the match. have a little thought of that match.
Could somebody please tell me the odds before the final ball (three runs were needed to win, two for the tie).
Many thanks.
Many thanks.
think it was something like 2.4 South Africa / 1.68 NZ ?
fluctuated loads, think lowest NZ went before the ball was bowled was about 1.48ish briefly
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539