Jan 6, 2013 -- 5:30AM, housefull wrote:
pakistani player is match fixer they do any thing
Jan 6, 2013 -- 8:30AM, Injera wrote:
At what point Nigel, was that game thrown by Pakistan?Before Saeed took 5 or after?Before Pakistan were 100-3 or after?They threw away a winning position in a low scoring match. Sure they have 'history' but I'm willing to judge matches on a game by game basis NOT by which teams are playing.
Dead rubber + huge money at stake = great opportunity to fix. I'm not saying this one was but it was a great opportunity.
Jan 6, 2013 -- 8:31AM, MadDogs wrote:
so you fix screamers should be counting your stacks not whining like a bunch of pu$$ies on here
Just because it's fixed doesn't mean you know which way or how it will be fixed.
Jan 6, 2013 -- 8:38AM, DStyle wrote:
i'm with injera here. there was also nothing in the prices that indicated a fix.pakistan's previous means that everyone thinks when this sort of thing happens it must be a fix; but it happens to other teams sometimes and we never get the same response.surely all the people claiming fix have to concede that events like this do happen in cricket without anything untoward going on. therefore they cannot be certain that pakistan are guilty.
Agreed. Market is so liquid - prices wouldn't have been obvious like they are in county cricket.
Jan 6, 2013 -- 8:40AM, DStyle wrote:
your last two posts aren't consistent nigel.
In what way?
Jan 6, 2013 -- 8:42AM, DStyle wrote:
Dead rubber + huge money at stake = great opportunity to fix. Just because it's fixed doesn't mean you know which way or how it will be fixed.
how's that a contradiction?