Nov 25, 2012 -- 12:09PM, Queen_Dulu wrote:
all those things you mentioned combined may make it a 1.03 shot at best... 1.20 is MASSIVE.
1/33!!! eh? SA can definitely bat 90 overs if they have to. That alone is probably 1/10.
Rain - who knows? but say 1/10 again
and you are at the current price.
Nov 25, 2012 -- 4:07PM, DStyle wrote:
1/33!!! eh? SA can definitely bat 90 overs if they have to. That alone is probably 1/10.Rain - who knows? but say 1/10 againand you are at the current price. no you aren't, you're at 1.25anyhoo, 1/10 for south africa to see the day out is far too big. i'd make them 1/10 if they see out a session unscathed. there's not a chance in hell the bottom four can survive more than 30 overs between them, particularly given that fat jacques wont be able to protect them from the strike because he can't run.it's just a classically nervous book, and if my sleeping pattern wasn't off, i'd be quite happy to leave a lump on without watching; given i'll be up, and it may go shorter i'll be biding my time.
ouch! Several naive posts
Nov 26, 2012 -- 12:56AM, DStyle wrote:
lol nigel.i. careful calling people naive when your maths was wrong ii. just because i priced it up low, and my favourite prediction didn't occur, it doesn't make me naive or even necessarily wrong. but well done if you made a tidy profit here.unfortunately the crux of today came down to hilfenhaus bowling terribly, but that's the way it goes.
SA to survive 90 overs isn't that demanding. That was my base point.
Nov 26, 2012 -- 1:01AM, DStyle wrote:
you made it 1/10?that's pretty demanding isn't it?
fair point. Anyhow, it's over now.
Nov 27, 2012 -- 4:31PM, Footiefan111 wrote:
battleoz i told you it would be a draw
Haha sure did footiefan. Test Cricket is a crazy game. Well done.