Cricket
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
windies win toss and bat first
Show More
Why do they have such a problem with Narine? Just move forward and smash it. Not as if he varies where the ball comes from.
Sep 22, 2012 -- 5:09PM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
Why do they have such a problem with Narine? Just move forward and smash it. Not as if he varies where the ball comes from.
Simple answer - Miss it and you get stumped
Rampaul's gifts have still kept Aussies on par...even if they play out Naraine carefully they can still cross the line..
Its not fast bowling, if they dont hit it, they shouldnt be playing at this level.
This will be a close finish - odds quite surprising here - WI were well ahead before play but a great start from the aussies
if you played forward to narine there no problems
agree nige, whoever wins it will be close so anthing abovre 2.2 is value on anyone at the mo
I put more on them at the interval. Then got out a little bit when Warner started hitting. Then got out fully now.
that should give warner confidence to attack narine more
10 an over wins them the match, but I would prefer them to have reduced it to 8 required.
Sep 22, 2012 -- 5:11PM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:
Its not fast bowling, if they dont hit it, they shouldnt be playing at this level.
no one can pick him so what do you reckon should happen to the sport of cricket?
a slow ball heading at you from a fixed point.
well you should play and you'll earn millions cos you're obviously better than anyone at batting
http://www.crictime.co/live-cricket-streaming-1.htm
I think they just wait and get caught by the spin, when they should think more strategically.
I need Watson to be top runs scorer and Australia to win the tournament. If I get those I should win the Betfair forum competition.
do you know how ridiculous you sound? these guys play and practice cricket professionally and they are struggling to pick narine and you reckon it should be easy and they should think more strategically?
because I dont play cricket that means I am not allowed an opinion?
Sep 22, 2012 -- 5:23PM, tsango wrote:
do you know how ridiculous you sound? these guys play and practice cricket professionally and they are struggling to pick narine and you reckon it should be easy and they should think more strategically?
Yeah, you can't think you know more than these guys
Because Stephen Hawking has not been to the Moon, does this mean he knows less about space than a fully trained astronaut?
no, it means that they would know better than you.
it's like you telling nasa it's easy to reach the sun - just need to add more fuel and that should do it
it's like you telling nasa it's easy to reach the sun - just need to add more fuel and that should do it
Aussies good if these 2 hang around. The rest are average
sportsmen are sportsmen because they are good at sport not because of their intellect.
10.02pm/b>We are going off with this massive downpour. The covers are coming on, they will cover the whole ground, but let me tell you that the par score at this moment is 81
Game should be 44 minutes off ending normally. I would say they have 35-40 minutes up there sleeve, so I think we are in for a wait..
Ok,so if it resumes within that time, D/L doesnt come into play?
just laid out of my position don't want anymore risky stuff
Right now there is a reduction of 10.5 overs. Things will change depending on any decisions made.
But as far as I know any reduction in overs will benefit the Aussies?
if it stays like this and aussies win on Duckworth Lewis, will the normal match odds be settled for australia or is it void?
With just 1 wicket down every over deducted means they can take more chances so look's like job done just about. West Indies need to bowl them all out to win.
cricinfo - My amateur calculation says they will start reducing overs if we don't resume play by 10.16pm. One over for every four minutes lost after 10.16pm
Days of crap matches then two matches today ruined by rain.
there are rumors that a lot of the matches win be rain effected
maybe have that in mind when you bet on them Footiefan, most people seem to ignore the possibility of rain, so you can take advantage.
September is Sri Lanka's ' rainiest ' month so it does beg the question why they would host it there in September.
its the icc they are men in suits but they know nothing about cricket
note to self - always leave money in bank for these situations - 1.01 is free money
I went to Sri Lanka twice, they carry brolly's all the time because when it's not P**sing it down it's baking your head
Okiae then...windies bet didnt pay well after all...first loss this T20 world cup..hope for a better day tomorrow...see you guys..!!!
Sep 22, 2012 -- 5:48PM, cardshark wrote:
September is Sri Lanka's ' rainiest ' month so it does beg the question why they would host it there in September.
As Sifon said, no it's not. However, October appears to be.
can somebody tell my gayle top WI bat was voided on betfair
Pretty sure that in the initial WI top bat market both Bravo's were listed as 'runners' but as Darren didnt play the market was voided and 'top WI bat 2' market opened and put in play.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539