Cricket
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Hello Everyone,
So here we go for last round match of this Superb SLPL tourny
Hope Every one have a decent book in the end.
I wish that we all stay green
Move On
Last Night UVA was 1.87 and Now 1.77 Negna, Malik is not palying Gul is playing
Market Reacting that Nazir and Shahzad will open today
UVA have won the toss and choose to bat
Wait for some quick runs from UVA Expecting 155+ or big score from UVA and Lay Big UVA at around 1.50 1.60 1.65
Going for Negna's Chase in the end with huge decent green
Good Luck To All,
Best Regards,
SalmanVictor
So here we go for last round match of this Superb SLPL tourny
Hope Every one have a decent book in the end. I wish that we all stay green
Move On
Last Night UVA was 1.87 and Now 1.77 Negna, Malik is not palying Gul is playing
Market Reacting that Nazir and Shahzad will open today
UVA have won the toss and choose to bat
Wait for some quick runs from UVA Expecting 155+ or big score from UVA and Lay Big UVA at around 1.50 1.60 1.65
Going for Negna's Chase in the end with huge decent green
Good Luck To All,
Best Regards,
SalmanVictor
Show More
why judge it on that SoA? what if more/less runs/wickets? what about run rate? I know having more wickets left means they can go for it more later. 110 from 14 is 7.85 RR
because that is a good score to work around. If they are say, 95/2 from 12, you can say that they are on target for around 110 from 14, but with an extra wicket, so should score just over 170. If for 4, just under, for example.
Run rate is actually not that important in T20. What is important is the timing of the wickets. If there is a wicket in the powerplay, it will stunt the run rate and slow them down. If there is a wicket just after the first six overs, less important, and should affect the odds less, because the chances are that they were going to slow down then anyway.
yeah i get you, there was a wicket on 1.6 here and i think they were cautious not to lose another soon after. Is that right?
I dont know, depends on the team strategy.
At the moment, with this score, I would think like this - they are four overs away from 14 overs. At 7 an over they'll be just over 100 runs. But they have two wickets to spare from that score that I assess this by, so they should be getting 160s-170s, but that will be less if they do not score at 7 an over, or if they lose another wicket before then.
If they got to 110 without losing another wicket, before the 14th over, bigger than 170 is likely.
run out, jumped out to 2.0 then straight back into 1.85 again, where they were
Not sure why, its just Chanderpaul coming in to bat.
I'd trust her at a set up more than Stosur at 1.02.
i never back at those odds. martic hasn't played on hard since march. hasn't played since 1R at wimby
Meanwhile, Uva are on 113/3 from 14 overs. That says 170-175 to me.
was on twitter @SalmanVictor
Bets Layed heavy Negna's 1st because looked for runs and UVA got then fav and layed Double UVA Now huge green on Negna Want to lay more UVA but suddenly rain Effected But just mmake a call at Colombo and said Its heavy right now but match will re-start.
Hope Rain will stop soon and we will get game on. Good Luck Guys
Bets Layed heavy Negna's 1st because looked for runs and UVA got then fav and layed Double UVA Now huge green on Negna Want to lay more UVA but suddenly rain Effected But just mmake a call at Colombo and said Its heavy right now but match will re-start.
Hope Rain will stop soon and we will get game on. Good Luck Guys
If you look at the CMM market, it seems the rain has picked up, and there's a great chance of a washout.
its still raining i reckon, as espn are still showing random sh*t
how long do we have to play for D/L and loss of overs to come into play?
My some mates are there just near at ground they said to me Well here we go for play
You're right - shot up and then down again in a trice. Would have made a profitable trade!
tennis rained out. Srich Bartoli 1.01 -> 1.12 in a TB 2nd set now. Backer's nightmare, trader's dream. Wasn't on it
Welcome back both. In the meantime I have added to my stake in Uva. Whether that was a good thing to do is another matter
i've 30 green off an initial 200. could have taken 70. not great at all at all
As I said that 155+ Well now Move on fr Lovely chase :)
nice sri-lankan interview on ESPN now. totally agree with him
all depends on how effective oram is on this pitch.
comms reckons it's a belter but they are guessers most of the time.
comms reckons it's a belter but they are guessers most of the time.
Why do the commentators keep saying that 5 overs constitutes a game?!
Has always been 6 overs, no?
Has always been 6 overs, no?
Aug 27, 2012 -- 6:22PM, keepgreeningout wrote:
Why do the commentators keep saying that 5 overs constitutes a game?!Has always been 6 overs, no?
No it's always been 5 overs in T20 cricket
market is moving about 5 secs quicker than espn. easy to see with trading software
And I was just about to say that Nazir had 'got his eye in' ...
You could be right Yash. I haven't risked it and greened out on both
Both side have BIG win 
ALERT ALERT Backed Tie at 18s Just Got tie at 18 #SLPL
ALERT ALERT Backed Tie at 18s Just Got tie at 18 #SLPL
Aug 27, 2012 -- 6:48PM, SalmanDVictor wrote:
Both side have BIG win ALERT ALERT Backed Tie at 18s Just Got tie at 18Â #SLPL
All your posts just say "Big" or "Huge". What are the actual numbers??
Agreed SoA. But still too early for morse to make an appearance
too busy finishing his McDonalds shift. Him and Salman are rivals on here. And in the workplace. Salman works for Burger King.
they get their tips from the cleaner who works as both restaurants. She is Russian.
stuck 200 on after that wicket at 1.34. huge overcorrection there
'Mr Salman, you finish salting the chip and I give you tip, yah? I hear that is good thing bet on Nags today. They have big score first, but they win. You tell everyone yes?'
She would tell us herself, but she doesnt have internet access.
with no reasoning, hence a complete guess.
Srichaphan or Ancic? • August 27, 2012 7:36 PM BST
with no reasoning, hence a complete guess
When a "guesser" is consistently successful, who needs reasoning? This isn't an exam. I, for one only care about results.
Seeing as nobody knows, we're all guessers in my book. Just some are better than others and Salman has a good record.
with no reasoning, hence a complete guess
When a "guesser" is consistently successful, who needs reasoning? This isn't an exam. I, for one only care about results.
Seeing as nobody knows, we're all guessers in my book. Just some are better than others and Salman has a good record.
I have seen more incorrect predictions from him to be fair.
Srichaphan or Ancic? 27 Aug 12 19:36 Joined: 18 May 03 | Topic/replies: 25,874 | Blogger: Srichaphan or Ancic?'s blog
with no reasoning, hence a complete guess.
You can't guess every stage
well No Argue Won superb With great Script See ya
with no reasoning, hence a complete guess.
You can't guess every stage
well No Argue Won superb With great Script See ya
i'm a mere novice, don't have a clue about cricket yet. I suppose nags didn't need to win but wanted to avoid wayama in the semi, so the better team were actually motivated
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539