Cricket
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
Cricinfo says play to start at 8.20. Does anyone know anymore than that. Cheers
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 25
|
By:
10 overs per side, should be fun. Commentary here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/cricket/18672855
|
|
By:
Surrey bat.
|
|
By:
Cheers pal, nice one.
|
|
By:
KP out 1st ball
 Jesus wept. |
|
By:
Whado we reckon is a decent score? 110/120?
|
|
By:
yeah 120 would be a winning score i reckon
|
|
By:
Hampshire have some serious power in there batting line up
|
|
By:
looking like Surrey will get 90-95ish. don't expect that to be enough (if the match is completed)
|
|
By:
dunno. surrey defended average totals pretty well this season (obviously the last game their total was nowhere near enough!)
|
|
By:
really horrid knock that from de Bruyn. 8 off 14 balls would be very poor in a Twenty20 match, let alone a 10 over a side match
|
|
By:
84/4. 85 to win, think Hampshire SHOULD win this, couple of early wickets will make a big difference though
|
|
By:
84 for surrey. Not enough imo. Go on hampshire
|
|
By:
You go for your shots with 10 overs. You dont knock it around and finish with just four wickets.
|
|
By:
having said that you cant be having 1.4s on Hampshire, they were 1.6s a minute ago.
|
|
By:
yeah hampshire obviously favourites here, 1.44 ridiculously short though imo, should be 1.7ish
|
|
By:
hampshire were evens for a second there
 |
|
By:
they shouldnt be 1.1s
 |
|
By:
not yet anyway
|
|
By:
some lucy fecker got evens, i was to slow as i'm drinking
|
|
By:
theyre actually on less than Surrey were at this stage
|
|
By:
go on the royals. QF place is nearly secure
 |
|
By:
placed 500 on surrey to win, as it was a limited over match is all bets void?? any help would be grateful
|
|
By:
sorry hobson but you lost mate. D/l method
|
|
By:
Thanks for the response, it hurts but lesson learn,t
|
|
By:
One of the key things about Cricket betting is to understand the basic rules. You'll be eaten alive if you don't get these!
|