|
By:
Tamim is back, I am backing Bangladesh
|
|
By:
2.1 for 160 runs on here.
that's mad considering the last 2 scores on this ground have been 176 (by zim against SA) and 209 (SA against Bang) which was also chased to 170 by bangladesh. doesn't seem like a sub 160 ground to me |
|
By:
Anyone found a stream?
|
|
By:
Sky 846 or hitcric
|
|
By:
sorry. Sky 834
|
|
By:
Thank you....1.01 layer
|
|
By:
these adverts doing me head in, keep like seeing 5 ball overs.
|
|
By:
No probs Grandad.
Zim ticking over nicely. Not sure I'd have them quite this short though. They could still derail. |
|
By:
Bang would need to hold onto catches though
![]() |
|
By:
missing wickets every over coz of adverts
|
|
By:
More ads than cricket. This is a joke. Coverage just goes back to see another batsman walking off, then it's back to the ads again.
|
|
By:
Evens now. I should back my judgement more
![]() |
|
By:
If Zims bowl anything like they did yesterday ...........they win here!
Jarvis again is a worry though! |
|
By:
lay of Zimb at 1.4 was almost too good to be true - shame i only went in small
|
|
By:
the advert curse strikes again.
![]() |
|
By:
where taibu?
|
|
By:
it's hte big one, Iqbal out!
|
|
By:
another one down cremer straight in with a wicket.
52/3 from 6.5 |
|
By:
any link pls?
|
|
By:
above
|
|
By:
Bangers running a lot of good 2's to keep up with the rate during the last 5 overs
|
|
By:
and just as i say that they get out going for a second run when they had done all the hard work
|
|
By:
45 from 36 needed with 4 wickets down.
|
|
By:
35 needed from 30 balls. Bangers to lose from here.
|
|
By:
22 needed from 24 balls with 4 wickets down.
|
|
By:
Traded this game like a C**t but will wnd up with a win of £0.01p on Bangers!
I gave a worse performane than Zims did! |
|
By:
all over with 15 balls to spare.
|
|
By:
Got to Go To School on what i did wrong here, got away with it but didn't deserve too!
|
|
By:
All those 2's in the middle overs won it for Bangers. During that period they never hit a boundary for 8 overs.
|