punjab vs deccan

It is all over the place.

they will not get these runs

444444444444 yash

Market panic

christian had a shocker here

Market forgetting Steyn.

1.84
punjab

yashgupta • May 13, 2012 6:45 PM BST
i am finish if  dc win the match

-----------------------------------------

Hyvää päivää, Yash....

this is entirely sangakarra's fault.

should never have come to this.

a match-losing over for deccan :-(

With Steyn to bowl? You think? 24 required from two overs.

Gotta fancy Punjab here

if punjab just need a couple of boundaries in last over, then they win it...

3-56 at 7.2, steyn with three in the locker and he lets the pinch hitter punish dross and mr cricket allowed to get his eye in.

dogshit captaincy.

A lot to do in the final over...

what happen hussy

why the full toss

Drama

yash

14 needed off 5

Thai?

this kid looks quite handy with the bat tbf

666

shocking field...so obvious

omg

!!!

Market hasn't got a clue

sangka hasnt got the foggiest

yes

What a shot

Is Sanga doing a Tait?

have to get the tie

yash

ffs

i run needed or super over

Dot ball, please.

yash may be party

could have won a lot on this.

take a bow kumar you utter muppet.

get the **** in

How's your Finnish, Yash?

lmao the short ball

that was atrocious.

CARNAGE!!! hahahahahahaahahaa.... SSSshhhhhhh

thats how you finnish a match the perfect innings from the youngster

I think after the number of big scores they have conceded, something is going on with Deccan. I am suspicious of them.

I took a loss but at least I saved my self a huge loss, this is really poor cricket. DC are undoubtedly the worst IPL side. This is 3 times they've set 180+ and lost.

lovely result for me there backed em at 9.2 3.75 n 2.8

Yaaaashhhhh!!!

great match

Yash knew!!

yash r u there?

glad I cashed out on that, could have lost a lot of money if I'd gone out or something.

Where's that fella that only logs on once he's sure he's set to collect gone?

comms need to stop concentrating on what happened in the last over.

you put pressure on any bowler and they'll feel it.

i'll say it again (and i took a small green on this match - so it's not fuelled by a loss) - it should NEVER EVER have got to the stage where they could win it in the final over.

diabolical from sangakarra.

thats you isnt it ArmchairIdiot? This forum was like a desert for most of this match.

robin jackman is a mug he said punjab had no chance off winning when they where 26-2

Sanga...what a filthy captain. For a man as intelligent as he is, his decisions are complete woe.

May 13, 2012 -- 11:11AM, cliveyboy wrote:

backing kings fair price for a big chase

sometimes this IPL is easy

Not me, SoA. Ive not claimed to have won a penny.

Deccan are ****. Could have been so much worse if i hadnt cashed out halfway through Christian's terrible over.

where's RJB gone?

do that at those odds every time cliveyboy, then post your profit

but yet again, a final ball finish, breaking all the rules of probability.

(With irony), you have a suspicious mind, SorA?

No, not really SoA. The nature of the game makes it very probable. You need to get an understanding of this format. You'll win even more money!

just logged in after an epic game, no bets on it mainly because there was no way i could trust deccan to finish it off

How does the nature of the game make it more probable than in other T20 tournaments?

what a day of sport. Gunners get third, City pip Manure in the dying seconds, and now this madness. Love it.

dont like to boast i have got it wrong as well  CSK fecked me against RR with their slow chase but overall this LPL my most profitable yet

anyone else think gony should be snipped and not allowed to breed? that was up there with the most illogical things ive ever seen? 2 bouncers in the final over? oh and will someone please tell the commentators that steyn is not a good death bowler. he has never come up with a malinga like over at the death to help his team

May 13, 2012 -- 1:13PM, ArmchairIdiot wrote:

what a day of sport. Gunners get third, City pip Manure in the dying seconds, and now this madness. Love it.

Because where there's a target to reach in a certain time limit, you see very close games if main wkts remain intact. Its not complicated mate

oops

Because where there's a target to reach in a certain time limit, you see very close games if main wkts remain intact. Its not complicated mate

that didnt answer the question. How is it more probable than in other T20 tournaments?

The third time Deccan Chargers (mainly Christian) have screwed me.

and S o A, please tell me how you have come up with a probability for a game going to the last ball or over? AI is right, the nature of the game and how humans work (our reactions to pressure) and its only 20 overs...your bound to see tight games...

Show me some stats, and I'll go through them with you...

you still have to feel DC can't really be this **** to lose in so many winning situations.

May 13, 2012 -- 1:15PM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:

that didnt answer the question. How is it more probable than in other T20 tournaments?

ive said this before. the lack of OVERALL quality. in england, you dont have indians like gony who bowl bouncers in the last over, or indians fielders who cant take a KARBON KAMAL catch when its down their throat...the poor players in this tournament succumb to pressure when they are leading, letting the opposttion back. they dont have the quality and experience to finish games off, as you might see in english t20 or world cup or nternationals

maybury, he knows all this...that's what makes it slightly annoying

So you reckon the extremes of good quality players and poor players, and the middling quality of English T20 teams, accounts for the difference?

May 13, 2012 -- 1:17PM, mayburydrr wrote:

May 13, 2012 --  7:15PM, Srichaphan or Ancic? wrote:that didnt answer the question. How is it more probable than in other T20 tournaments?ive said this before. the lack of OVERALL quality. in england, you dont have indians like gony who bowl bouncers in the last over, or indians fielders who cant take a KARBON KAMAL catch when its down their throat...the poor players in this tournament succumb to pressure when they are leading, letting the opposttion back. they dont have the quality and experience to finish games off, as you might see in english t20 or world cup or nternationals

The King's batsmen that got 29/12 might have something to say about that

May 13, 2012 -- 1:15PM, hotch1234 wrote:

The third time Deccan Chargers (mainly Christian) have screwed me.

learn from it. never ever back DC to defend a total...you should learn next time and come out green!

Whether we win or lose, you still wonder how so many matches have been decided in such dramatic fashion so late in the game.

It is fixed for entertainment purposes, no doubt.

In English T20 cricket, half the crowd are asleep.

hotch, my point is its the winning team who throw it away...if that kings batmsmen had needed 12 off the last 2 overs i gaurantee he would have run himself and hussey out in one ball leaving the 9 and 10 to win it....then you would have seen the bowlers bowl leg side full tosses and wides, taking the game to the last ball...

I give up! Later lads, good luck.

the trouble is S o , you are saying that around 50 world class cricket players are fixing games. not playing to win, but for money, or for sexual favours or whatever you think it is. i think its unliekly

Not for money, for entertainment.

And its not the whole lot of them, its the players who come on and bowl ludicrous balls, no balls, wides etc. with two-three overs to go to turn a winning position into a close finish. And no, theyre often not Indian players.

I have been to a few English T20 matches. Though not one of them, I have often seen spectators creating their own entertainment (drinking) before passing out ("sleeping") and missing the ending.

i dont understand why do people back deccan chokers, after their loss to rcb i learnt my lesson that even if they score 250+ i will lay them at all odds possible, which  I did today. hope you guys learnt a lesson

****

S o A, why would these players do that. whats their perk? have the IPL convinved them they get browny points or gold stars if they are involved in a tight game? its ludicrous all these world class international players would jeopardize their reputation and their careers, just so the IPL has better viewer ratings. madness

ArmchairIdiot • May 13, 2012 7:08 PM BST
where's RJB gone?

--------------------------------

Went to have my dinner. Once I'd made a packet on Punjab, didn't see the point in staying... And before you start with your BS again, you can check my earlier posts where comments like "this is doable" clearly show that I had just put money on Punjab...

sanga in lose a game from victory shocker

seriously, why did the bowler bowl a bouncer last ball with fine leg up

S or A,why do you bet or watch if ****? No doubt Delhi were non jiggers yesterday but that was obvious after 4 overs.This win was odds against but punters are realising what is probable and more likely possible. Up to 15 off the last is a shade over Evs depending on the bowler.Look at Hilf getting schooled last week against Smith.2 a ball over the last 3 overs has been done several times this tourny.Put simply if the team I've laid has a shot maker in and req under 14 off the last over I am defo bailing.I was stubborn when RCB needed 19  against Pune........I got beat and 3/1 was readily available at the start of the 20th or I could have laid 2/7 about my 6/4 wager. Got greedy got burnt.