loving the talk of brittle saffer batting line up from the britishers. couldn't make 100 against the paki mugs but the saffers are brittle. have folks not be watching cricket the last year? everybody's been getting shot out sub 300
loving the talk of brittle saffer batting line up from the britishers. couldn't make 100 against the paki mugs but the saffers are brittle. have folks not be watching cricket the last year? everybody's been getting shot out sub 300
Lol bit of a difference between Pakistan and New Zealand's attacks Rolo. Saffers been shot out twice on decent decks by a workmanlike like Kiwi attack.
Lol bit of a difference between Pakistan and New Zealand's attacks Rolo. Saffers been shot out twice on decent decks by a workmanlike like Kiwi attack.
Nice try rollers. Pak have the 2nd best bowler in the world according to the rankings + 2 more in the worlds top 20. NZ have Vettori and he's only there cos he doesnt go for many runs.
Nice try rollers. Pak have the 2nd best bowler in the world according to the rankings + 2 more in the worlds top 20. NZ have Vettori and he's only there cos he doesnt go for many runs.
24 wickets in 2 days surely tells us that it's not the easiest of batting conditions out there.
anyways, its all building up nicely to the eng/saf showdown, all will be revealed, who are the most brittle, who are the biggest chokers, who have the best looking WAGS, who have the best attack, etc ......
24 wickets in 2 days surely tells us that it's not the easiest of batting conditions out there.anyways, its all building up nicely to the eng/saf showdown, all will be revealed, who are the most brittle, who are the biggest chokers, who have the best
Part of my tongue in cheek comments were in response to all the sh*t that has been written in the last month particularly by missinfo about how the saffers are 'deserving number ones' when they cannot even beat anyone half decent in their own back yard.
Part of my tongue in cheek comments were in response to all the sh*t that has been written in the last month particularly by missinfo about how the saffers are 'deserving number ones' when they cannot even beat anyone half decent in their own back ya
Ball may have swung away down leg if it hadnt hit Rosco on the full but since it had the ball must be assumed to go straight which means clipping at least leg stump for me.
Ball may have swung away down leg if it hadnt hit Rosco on the full but since it had the ball must be assumed to go straight which means clipping at least leg stump for me.
saffers would deserve number 1 if they had won this series 3-0
ok home form not been great but dont lose anywhere
You could say Englands away form pretty poor for a so called number 1 side as much as south africas home form.
saffers would deserve number 1 if they had won this series 3-0 ok home form not been great but dont lose anywhereYou could say Englands away form pretty poor for a so called number 1 side as much as south africas home form.
Eng drew 1-1 in SA, Win 2-0 in Bangladesh, Win 3-1 in Australia, Lose 3-0 in Pakistan. Pretty solid away form in addition to dominating at home.
South Africa haven't beaten one of the other top 4 sides in a series for over 3 years. Played Aus twice at home England at home and India home and away in that period. 4 home series against other sides in the top and they didn't win one. How can they deserve to be number 1?
Eng drew 1-1 in SA, Win 2-0 in Bangladesh, Win 3-1 in Australia, Lose 3-0 in Pakistan. Pretty solid away form in addition to dominating at home. South Africa haven't beaten one of the other top 4 sides in a series for over 3 years. Played Aus twice a
Why they are the last 4 away series since the sides last met.
You get my point though 4 home series in the last few years v against the other big three and they haven't won one of them.
Why they are the last 4 away series since the sides last met. You get my point though 4 home series in the last few years v against the other big three and they haven't won one of them.
barring the ashes win weve struggled away from home
ok saffers didnt finish us off and that is an issue for them but england were easily 2nd best in that series
If they get back to number 1, which is by no means assured it will be 100% deserved
barring the ashes win weve struggled away from home ok saffers didnt finish us off and that is an issue for them but england were easily 2nd best in that series If they get back to number 1, which is by no means assured it will be 100% deserved
I think very little in it between sides, hence why fancy a drawn series this summer
theyve also won in eng,oz,drawn in pak and india far better than weve doneI think very little in it between sides, hence why fancy a drawn series this summer
fair enough nuggs what matter is the series result, but you gotta admit that the saffers were a tad unlucky. they defo had the upper hand over england at home, came very very close to beating india away, and played a 2 test series against aussies which should have been 3, and the aussies pulled off a great escape in 2nd test.
wont debate england's number 1 ranking, they had some brilliant victories, but you gotta admit that sides have not found it easy beating the saffers in recent years.
fair enough nuggs what matter is the series result, but you gotta admit that the saffers were a tad unlucky. they defo had the upper hand over england at home, came very very close to beating india away, and played a 2 test series against aussies whi
Yes if they get there it will be deserved Steps as that is the system we play under. My original point is that many journalists and cricket writers had been saying they were already deserving number ones before this series.
Pretty sure India have only lost 3 series in the last 6 years are the deserving number two behind the saffers who have lost 2?
Not disputing any of your points Rolo.
SY i think the away victory in England is pretty irrelevant now. Poor poor England side with a joke coach. Team has changed a fair bit from then and it was 3 and a half years ago. Not taking anything away from the saffers achievement there either. They rightly found their way to number one at the end of 2008 as they had been winning series home and away.
Yes if they get there it will be deserved Steps as that is the system we play under. My original point is that many journalists and cricket writers had been saying they were already deserving number ones before this series. Pretty sure India have onl
we'll stuff this saffer team in england this summer, weather permitting we'll win the series 2-0, been saying it for months and nothing SA have doe this winter has changed my mind on that one.
They have an outstanding set of individuals the Saffers but they still mange to play to a level that is bellow the sum of their parts.
England have faced their toughest test this year and came up well short, beatin SL and India away and improving their battin in those conditions is what England need to do to take them to the next level. Beating saffers at home wont convince me that we're some kind of super team, which will almost certainly be the reaction when we do.
we'll stuff this saffer team in england this summer, weather permitting we'll win the series 2-0, been saying it for months and nothing SA have doe this winter has changed my mind on that one.They have an outstanding set of individuals the Saffers bu
fox sports is just brilliant, zero to no ads, always intrigues me how they can run a station with no ads and the likes of sky have 3 or 4 times more ads
fox sports is just brilliant, zero to no ads, always intrigues me how they can run a station with no ads and the likes of sky have 3 or 4 times more ads
another instance of eagle fecking up, hotspot showed his the impact occured before his leg was bent, yet hawkeye shows the impact at a point after his leg is bent. Their technology is not good enough on the point of impact which is a huge issue for LBW's, everyone needs to use hawkeye.
another instance of eagle fecking up, hotspot showed his the impact occured before his leg was bent, yet hawkeye shows the impact at a point after his leg is bent. Their technology is not good enough on the point of impact which is a huge issue for L
Am I alone in thinking Barry Richards is a twonk In his world everything SA do is the best in the game of cricket, everything kiwis well do is just lucky
The way he goes on you would think he invented cricket
Am I alone in thinking Barry Richards is a twonkIn his world everything SA do is the best in the game of cricket, everything kiwis well do is just luckyThe way he goes on you would think he invented cricket
pretty impressive for an overweightish 36/37 year old to still get it up to 140 at will, takes a lot of effort to get a cricket ball to move that fast
yes dougy hasnt been ideal for tahir, but does seem like the kind of bowler who can destroy an average line-up but find it much harder against a bit of class. let's see early days, could still run through the tail quickly here
pretty impressive for an overweightish 36/37 year old to still get it up to 140 at will, takes a lot of effort to get a cricket ball to move that fastyes dougy hasnt been ideal for tahir, but does seem like the kind of bowler who can destroy an avera
yep pttt there will always be takers, but very silly imo when looking at innings scores of 185, 168 and 253 here. a 50/5 very possible and then its serious brown pants time
yep pttt there will always be takers, but very silly imo when looking at innings scores of 185, 168 and 253 here. a 50/5 very possible and then its serious brown pants time
PLEASE TELL THE TRUTH 16 Mar 12 23:29 philander is defo n1 bowler in world where has he been mafeking 16 Mar 12 23:36 let's not jump the gun. tremendous start to his test career but it's been on bowler friendly tracks against ropey batting line ups.
That's a bit unfair, maf. I wouldn't call the Aus batting line-ups he destroyed ropey. And if they did look that way it's only because of what the ex-Devon and future-Somerset legend did to them.
PLEASE TELL THE TRUTH 16 Mar 12 23:29 philander is defo n1 bowler in world where has he beenmafeking 16 Mar 12 23:36 let's not jump the gun. tremendous start to his test career but it's been on bowler friendly tracks against ropey batting l
few on twitter were suggesting that the pitches were helpful, which is true, but steyn and morkel have bowled on those same pitches in those 6 test matches and have 27 at 22 and 16 at 34 to the verns 45 at 13. So you can bash the batting line ups and you can bash the pitches but when judge him against the best on those same pitches against the same line ups, his record still stands up.
few on twitter were suggesting that the pitches were helpful, which is true, but steyn and morkel have bowled on those same pitches in those 6 test matches and have 27 at 22 and 16 at 34 to the verns 45 at 13. So you can bash the batting line ups and
not sure he'll run through england, he's the kind of bowler kp will bully if he gets in, he will cause all sorts of trouble for cook and probably nick bell off a few times. Be a good battle but still see england getting the job done this summer, honestly think it will be a convincing win in the end.
not sure he'll run through england, he's the kind of bowler kp will bully if he gets in, he will cause all sorts of trouble for cook and probably nick bell off a few times. Be a good battle but still see england getting the job done this summer, hone
all i'm saying is his stats have been heavily distorted by the conditions so far. early season in safferland and it is a poor aussie batting line up certainly against a decent attack, woeful travellers sri lanka and plenty of county sides would field a better top 6 than new zealand.
a very small sample of games to be drawing huge conclusion. if he was a world beater why is making his debut at 25 ? let's see him when it's a lot tougher like late season on flat pitches like lords and the oval in england
all i'm saying is his stats have been heavily distorted by the conditions so far. early season in safferland and it is a poor aussie batting line up certainly against a decent attack, woeful travellers sri lanka and plenty of county sides would field
yep injera. farcical scheduling and it will be completely lost being in and the around the olympics.
anyone with any sense would have played the big series of the summer first in the may/june slot this year
yep injera. farcical scheduling and it will be completely lost being in and the around the olympics.anyone with any sense would have played the big series of the summer first in the may/june slot this year
screaming, will make a change if it's the opposition losing 15 wickets before lunch at the start of the season.
in any event doubt many games will see day 4 at taunton in the first half of the season
screaming, will make a change if it's the opposition losing 15 wickets before lunch at the start of the season. in any event doubt many games will see day 4 at taunton in the first half of the season
Well, Zum can't blame lack of practice this year. I'll be popping into the County Ground at some point tomorrow to catch a bit of the pre-season friendly vs Glum. Cricket in England on 19 March
Well, Zum can't blame lack of practice this year. I'll be popping into the County Ground at some point tomorrow to catch a bit of the pre-season friendly vs Glum. Cricket in England on 19 March