OK, so we've had a string of incidents at the Games where athletes have not tried to win in order to manipulate results or draws.
Surely introducing someone to act purely as a pacemaker means they are trying not to win in order to manipulate the result. Or am I missing something ?
Of course you are missing something. He was trying to win as all the other athletes are. The fact that he wasn't good enough to do so but was picked because he is could help facilitate the medal prospects of somebody else is a different issue completely. One which arguably doesn't conform to the olympic ideal but still different.
Of course you are missing something. He was trying to win as all the other athletes are. The fact that he wasn't good enough to do so but was picked because he is could help facilitate the medal prospects of somebody else is a different issue complet
On another thread elsewhere I have posted a quote from a highly placed legal friend of mine " never trust any government implicitly , if they dont like whats happening they change the rules " . Substitute Olympic committees , rules officials , doctors certificates re 800 metres runner , 100 metre seat break rule , etc etc . If you have enough clout , and enough Nelson eyes anything becomes possible .
On another thread elsewhere I have posted a quote from a highly placed legal friend of mine " never trust any government implicitly , if they dont like whats happening they change the rules " . Substitute Olympic committees , rules officials , docto
What about the cycling road race. We had a team of five all purely there to win it for Cavendish. And most of the field didn't bother because they had a mate in the front group. All sports are different.
What about the cycling road race. We had a team of five all purely there to win it for Cavendish. And most of the field didn't bother because they had a mate in the front group. All sports are different.
when he was interviewed with the brothers after the event, he said "we were a team"
i couldn't help noticing that one of them didn't have a medal, i suspect when he wakes up in the morning and reads the papers he'll notice himself
when he was interviewed with the brothers after the event, he said "we were a team"i couldn't help noticing that one of them didn't have a medal, i suspect when he wakes up in the morning and reads the papers he'll notice himself
Hayes wouldn't have even made the Olympics if the selectors were picking on just ability and times. He's ranked 46th in the world and there were other GB athletes faster than him. He was picked because he's a good cyclist and could help control the pace for the Brownlee's. Yes Hayes doesn't have a medal, but he's probably just extremely happy to have taken part in an Olympics.
Hayes wouldn't have even made the Olympics if the selectors were picking on just ability and times. He's ranked 46th in the world and there were other GB athletes faster than him. He was picked because he's a good cyclist and could help control the p
Darlo answered your point. He was brought in to do a job and he did it. He can justifiably be proud of his efforts as can those who took the decision. Being smart is underrated.
Darlo answered your point. He was brought in to do a job and he did it. He can justifiably be proud of his efforts as can those who took the decision. Being smart is underrated.