Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
thread about it already but in the absence of a poll function..
Do you think this sentence is justified?
My answer is no
Do you think this sentence is justified?
My answer is no
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 103
|
By:
no - but i'd like to know about his rap sheet
|
|
By:
NO
 See what i did..  that's how angry i am. |
|
By:
I dont think it is the type of incident for which it particularly matters, unless he has a whole load of charges for peeing on symbols
 |
|
By:
Maybe he has a history of Home invasions , Pishing through peoples letter boxes ..
|
|
By:
well he might be on license, last chance saloon etc. A history of not paying fines & landing in pokey anyway? Serving a suspended sentence, lots of reasons why they could jail him. Of course this could also be his 1st offence. I'd like to know myself
|
|
By:
Don't see any point in any 2 week sentence meself.
Fine him, get him doing some community service, maybe cleaning up his mess. |
|
By:
my good lady has just informed me that he could have received 6 months. This would suggest his rap sheet is not that bad
|
|
By:
I have a family member.. Bash a total innocent on a train. Bash his living girlfriend, assault the arresting policeman.. walk into any shop take as much booze as you can carry (dont pay obv)
Gets a suspended sentence and a new flat. Happy days. |
|
By:
No and it doesn't show British justice in good light plus millions of people will saying one rule of one one rule for another and thats a dangerous thing
|
|
By:
Two years for bacon throwing in the UK aaronh. The grey hoodie guy won't get that even if they bother looking for him. Punish some people, let others go free.
|
|
By:
On its own, a custodial sentence is not justified imo. Fine would have sufficed.
|
|
By:
The boy has no criminal record..
  |
|
By:
https://www.itv.com/news/2020-06-15/andrew-banks-pleads-guilty-after-pictured-urinating-next-to-pc-keith-palmer-memorial/
Banks, a Tottenham Hotspur fan, was said to have mental health problems, the court heard. Explains a few things. A total of 113 people were arrested and the protest was condemned by Boris Johnson as “racist thuggery” and described as “mindless hooliganism” by police. |
|
By:
No criminal record. This seems to be a case of making an example.
|
|
By:
if that's the case i hope he's appealed
|
|
By:
If it had been a BLM protester doing exactly the same thing I can't help but think that most of the comments above would have been oh so different.
|
|
By:
Seems to me black guys has have a bit of a pass atm... imo.
|
|
By:
Not at all Charlie. NOBODY, especially with no criminal record should be receiving a jail sentence for this.
|
|
By:
Seems to me black guys have a bit of a pass atm... imo.
slightly more coherent..  |
|
By:
https://media.breitbart.com/media/2020/06/GettyImages-1219636039.jpg
Will these fine young gentlemen hand themselves in? I presume the media are publicly shaming them? |
|
By:
NO DISGUSTING JOKE...KHAN LABOUR JUSTICE
|
|
By:
Also after handing himself in. Just cannot understand this.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Boris calling it ‘racist thuggery’ confirms what a liberal ignorant buffoon he is.
Where was the racism? Anger at the Met for not doing their job and fury at scum who would deface Churchill and the Cenotaph. Like all lefties, Boris brings skin colour into it to tarnish patriots who give a damn. |
|
By:
It is the same rationale as the London riots a couple of years back saw people getting six months for looting bottles of water. It's not that he watered a monument but that he was there as part of a mass protest.
Pink Floyd's Ian Gilmour's son got more than a year from swinging from the Cenotaph iirc. |
|
By:
14 days a disgrace
|
|
By:
He was drunk and had a pee against some railings with no idea wots beside him! The whole world can see the photo.
He got 14 days in prison!!!! We are all doomed.... Well, a certain race is |
|
By:
have inerja and casemoney found a body yet
|
|
By:
He's lucky they did not do him for indecent exposure as well to make him officially a nonce.
|
|
By:
To be clear -- I think the sentence is well OTT but it is the same as the kids nicking water.
|
|
By:
I thought he was there to protect the statues?
Ends up going to jail. It is always nice when the story has a happy ending. Hooroo  |
|
By:
He said he was there to protect the statues but had no idea which statues he was protecting.
|
|
By:
The true crime here is the lack of public toilets in London. One of the reasons i mpved out
|
|
By:
when you compare the girl this week who stabbed a girl in the back twice after beating her up ,and got no jail time ,its an extremely harsh sentence ,he must have grounds for appeal especially as there are no public toilets open or cafes,pubs to use facilities.Not defending the guy but a community service order or fine would suffice.
|
|
By:
agree
|
|
By:
He can appeal. Won't be seen to as quick as his hearing. Be out in a week, and will get a date for it...in January!
|
|
By:
Clearly not guilty of what he was charged with, there's photographic evidence! How long should someone get for being a drunken idiot. Not many people in their 20s have not done something regrettable under the influence of alcohol.
|
|
By:
HE gets 14 days and a bloke murders someone and doesn't even get amention in media
bloke gets his throat slashed doesn't bother with hospital puts a bit of tape on it,and jogs on, or casemoney.injera could be telling porkies ,although inerja was there alongside the other 6,999 |