Jun 14, 2020 -- 6:55AM, ----you-have-to-laugh--- wrote:
Why add to your condemnation, that all it required.
He was wrong and it was a disgrace.
Jun 14, 2020 -- 7:01AM, ----you-have-to-laugh--- wrote:
You have gone beyond condemnation again.It wasn't required.
Interesting you only have selective condemnation.
Jun 14, 2020 -- 7:34AM, nineteen points wrote:
he should of had a drive up to barney castle to test them maybe
I recently had a pi$$ in hedge a few miles from there
Jun 14, 2020 -- 7:56AM, potlis wrote:
I’m sure when I listen to the early news on BBC this morning they reported “man urinated OVER memorial” ? now changed to “AT memorial”Wrong as it was, pi$$ing next to it obviously wasn’t shocking enough for the beeb.
Luckily there is a picture. Half the press went with on the memorial and half went with near.
Jun 15, 2020 -- 2:29AM, potlis wrote:
Let’s hope someone in authority gets round to asking WTF sort of memorial is that,
Jun 15, 2020 -- 2:29AM, potlis wrote:
Let’s hope someone in authority gets round to asking WTF sort of memorial is that,
Jun 15, 2020 -- 4:04AM, Facts wrote:
InsiderTrader 14 Jun 20 11:21 Did the disgraceful thugs that tore down that statue of our history in Bristol hand themselves in for the criminal damage they caused.Their actions have cost the country millions and set back race relations for yearsYou seem to have spectacularly missed the point.Or do you really think that there should be a statue to a slave trader of the Royal Africa Company responsible for tens of thousands of deaths of slaves. And whose initials RAC were branded onto the chests of slaves,men,women and children !!
That is something that can be debated.
Do you think we should have statues of James II (the founder of the RAC) what had DY (for Duke of York) branded on the slaves? What about Charles II who was also involved in its set up? Again can be debated.
Bristol has had a black Mayor for four years and a Labour Council. If they wanted to peacefully removed a statue then they could have.
If Britain does not want these statues up lets remove them democratically not by a mob of agitators that are trying to cause division in our society.
Jun 15, 2020 -- 5:06AM, Whisperingdeath wrote:
There is no doubt race relations are worse now than before those thugs ripped down the statue in Bristol and defaced Churchill.Not so. Apart from some of you old dinosaurs you might find your kids are sleeping with black, brown, yellow, red as well as white partners. The percentage of " mixed race " children is growing exponentially. AT least they are less likely to be inbred like the guy who p*ssed next to Palmers memorial
We are talking about the effect of the last a couple weeks where thugs have ripped down statues, thugs have fought the police, thugs have defaced Churchill.
All these actions with the media enhancing it have set back race relations IMO.
Before all this BLM anti-Capitalist/scrap the police nonsense very few issues in the UK.
Jun 15, 2020 -- 5:56AM, InsiderTrader wrote:
Jun 15, 2020 -- 11:06AM, Whisperingdeath wrote:There is no doubt race relations are worse now than before those thugs ripped down the statue in Bristol and defaced Churchill.Not so. Apart from some of you old dinosaurs you might find your kids are sleeping with black, brown, yellow, red as well as white partners. The percentage of " mixed race " children is growing exponentially. AT least they are less likely to be inbred like the guy who p*ssed next to Palmers memorialWe are talking about the effect of the last a couple weeks where thugs have ripped down statues, thugs have fought the police, thugs have defaced Churchill.All these actions with the media enhancing it have set back race relations IMO.Before all this BLM anti-Capitalist/scrap the police nonsense very few issues in the UK.
Allow me to summarise:
"It's all your fault"