Another Day, Another Failure To Count People

Your a bit of a count Angus you should volunteer.

Still wearing his smelly pink tie

He just spoke rubbish about the proportion of deaths in care homes

did i just hear Herbie correctly?

The proportion of people dying in care homes is down, he announces triumphantly

Either not realising what he's said or trying to con folk again.

Proportion, absolute numbers, all the same to Handjob.

4.4 million supposedly with 2.now 3 basic symptons,feeling like shoite have tested negative,their no banging on about antibody tests,no doubt a big chunk of these 4,4 million will waste another test just to satisfy themselves or have another day out

In general it looks like our numbers have plateaued, weekdays we seem to be stuck in or around the 300's, there's even an uptick on the graph today, and this without the release of lock down kicking in yet.

It's funny how he totally understands everything but knows nothing .

when numbers go up tues,wed,handjob and media make a big meal of weekend lag,but same handjob and media wet themselves with excitement at press conference and  front pages bragging about lowest deaths in 12 weeks etc,yesterday,without mentioning weekend effect,we,ve all known about weekend numbers for 3 months

with numbers counted in the wash up ,we now have 50,000 confirmed deaths

Goose no one really gives a fack anymore

The deaths are padded and they've totally lost the narrative on this whole thing

Jun 2, 2020 -- 5:19PM, duffy wrote:

In general it looks like our numbers have plateaued, weekdays we seem to be stuck in or around the 300's, there's even an uptick on the graph today, and this without the release of lock down kicking in yet.

I realise maths can be tricky, but last Tuesday was the day after a bank holiday, so a rolling average will be comparing a working day to the data of a bank holiday.

Hancock doesn't understand

He is briefed to read figures, which he does.

If he understood science he would realise he was talking bollox

Only a matter of time before he starts referring to Johnson as "our glorious leader"

last night,again today in commons and press conference,they keep listing reasons where and why bame people might catch virus,thats no the foooking point,the point is what happens to you compared to a white person once you've caught it

Do you think the obese should be treated differently?

Lots and Lots of moaning and naval gazing as usual, zero workable suggestions (as usual).

Patently, if you make extra allowances for one increased perceived risk, you need to apply the same logic to all the perceived risks. Unfortunately we just have a baiting MSM out to incite trouble.

Have you ever performed or participated in the performance of a risk assessment ?

Media back to the "is it more" question argument

We're talking 10-15,000 at most, nowhere near enough to mean anything else being done, they are clutching at straws now

Just add 200,000 to it and hurry up, they add digits for everything else

Jun 2, 2020 -- 6:33PM, Angoose wrote:

Have you ever performed or participated in the performance of a risk assessment ?

Is that meant to be a solution So someone who lived in London in a multi-generational house was at more risk? They went to the pub? They got on a tube? Drove a taxi? Went to a church or a mosque? Put them on a weighing scales? Access their health records? Ban them from visiting family? Prevent them from going away to less developed countries?

Another day, another failure to comment on Holyroods failings by angoose.
Incredible behaviour, one could think hes deliberately diverting attention away from wee jimmys 'mistakes'.

Dunno what Goosey is going to do with him/her self after this

Surely they can concoct another virus pandemic up? wave 2 the revenge of the covith or something

Freeman not very good at the counting. Told us less than 300 old people were moved from hospitals to care homes without tests.
Turns out it was close to 1000. Sturgeon said she was tired when she said 300. "Wake up sleepy Jeanne" was sung by all.
BTW again angoose failed to comment on it. I wonder why?

Jun 2, 2020 -- 7:33PM, Cider wrote:

Jun  2, 2020 --  5:33PM, Angoose wrote:Have you ever performed or participated in the performance of a risk assessment ?Is that meant to be a solution  So someone who lived in London in a multi-generational house was at more risk? They went to the pub? They got on a tube? Drove a taxi? Went to a church or a mosque? Put them on a weighing scales? Access their health records? Ban them from visiting family? Prevent them from going away to less developed countries?

So the answer is no, you have never undertaken a risk assessment.

That was my job for a number of years.
Risk assessments. In itself it means nothing unless you qualify it.

I was responsible for risk assessments and all coshh in a previous career ,what's yer question Angus you public sector snp supporting vegan parasite?

Ps that was a risk assessment of yourself.

I won't expect an answer but here goes.

@angoose Whats your thoughts on Kate Forbes, the Scottish Governments Finance Secretary, giving senior civil servants a 12% pay rise whilst withholding monies from  some businesses and councils. Monies btw that Westminster gave us to ease our burden during this crisis.
Given that loads of small and big businesses will go bust and thousands will lose their jobs do you think this was a good move by Forbes?

It could be worse, Derek Mackay could still be there.
Well still there as Finance Secretary, he is of course still there and receiving full pay as an MP.

Must admit, this is the first I’d heard of it.
A quick search and the only report that pops up is in The Daily Ranger, will do a bit more digging to understand the backstory.

The Daily Ranger? With a celtic supporting editor?
Try Kate Foster, she did a piece for the Daily Mail.
Assuming thats the story you hadn't heard of and not the withholding of the Westminster allocated handouts for business and local councils.

Yep it does appear that once again angoose has run away from the truth.

The figures don't add up. I mean as angoose says how hard is it?
No not in England but up here in Scotland.
Funny that angoose missed this story.

Also surprised that he didn't make a lot about the revelation from wee jimmy that no notes exist of the medical and scientific advice that the Scottish government redeived in the first 5 weeks of the pandemic. All word of mouth seemingly.

politicspunter - being a Wee Krankie & Fkackbord groupie; shirley should have made an effort?

The numbers never added up

Vanished from the media just like the riots have started to

NEXT!!!!! psyop please

Early June and since March we've had pandemic 1 and race wars, all wrapped up before the longest day of the year

What next

Pandemic Rebound ?

Race war round 2 ?

Oh how about economic meltdown?

The figures that don't add up are in respect of Sturgeons claims that all care home workers are being routinely tested.
The numbers needing to back this claim up fall well short of what would be required.

Funny how social distancing has taken a back seat to allow the riots.

The yanks think its a trap aka, it will be blamed on the 2nd wave in the fall

7 day incubation period becomes a 4 month one however

Wave 2 Return Of The Flu

Synopsis: The virus has been hiding on bricks and tear gas cannisters, but when unsuspecting rioters come into contact with these objects... all hell breaks loose.

Testing you say.
https://reaction.life/london-media-is-letting-nicola-sturgeon-off-the-hook-on-covid-19-failings/
"The testing rate is a disgrace. When  Sturgeon set a target of 10,000 tests a day by the end of April, she boasted it was “actually higher, proportionately, than for the UK as a whole”.  We are now into June, the target has never been met and tests are currently running at 4000 on a good day. A Scottish story or a UK story? It is certainly not one which Ms Sturgeon is going to offer as a soundbite for wider consumption."