Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
01 Jun 20
17:09
Joined:
Date Joined:
25 Dec 05
of these roughly million people a week with symptons they feel worthy enough of arranging and turning up for a test,and testing negative,what are they suffering from or because their free,do they just fancy a jolly
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 80
|
By:
Anyone still watching these?
|
|
By:
they look like been on the way out,hanjob in a hurry
|
|
By:
Another lie and twist fest
No answers to questions Hancock simply hasn't got a clue how many track and tracers have been contacted and what they have traced More likely dot to dot books than tracing |
|
By:
people following social distancing handjob said,wonder how he thinks they caught corona
 |
|
By:
say the name
|
|
By:
Track and trace just the death tolls and the testing BS... utterly that total BS
3 months and we've gone from dead bodies in hospital wards, to dead bodies in care homes, to testing targets, to tracking people through their phones Its so blatant and in your face ffs |
|
By:
So the Government are still making it up as they go along, and the hospitals are emptier than they have ever been.
So how long before general nursing staff are added to the furlough scheme? |
|
By:
Pointless having these every day now. Once a week is fine to cover anything worth reporting.
|
|
By:
Daily propaganda required to con the public
|
|
By:
think sonto,s right,government have either decided or been told the fat ladies starting to sing
|
|
By:
only thing that doesn't add up is,dint sunak get the email ,as he,s spaffing money way into October,
 |
|
By:
Leave King Rishi alone, he is not a naughty boy he is the New Messiah
 |
|
By:
The companies are being forced to chip in with furlogue now
So expect companies to say sod that and drag everyone back in |
|
By:
Death toll up 500+ on yesterday's figure, reported as 111 deaths
What's going on there, and why nobody spot it? |
|
By:
The contact tracing system is a half-baked pile of nonsense, and will make no difference at all our daily lives. Sounds like they are hoping the virus fizzles out. Meanwhile vulnerable groups are as scared as ever, small business owners are still very nervous. And for young and healthy, it's do as you like and if you're lucky, you might get paid for it.
|
|
By:
Loadsa free dosh on the dole for the young and healty
Know of 2 people signing on and they are having a good time with the extra money they get, no signing on and programmes to take part in, they've got it made |
|
By:
According to the Telegraph, total deaths now 39045, yesterday according to Worldometer total deaths were 38489. That's a difference of 556. I know I must have missed something, but the "Telegraph" quotes Hancock as claiming this is the "lowest daily death-rate since lockdown began"?
|
|
By:
38,489 yesterday
39,045 today Reported as 111 deaths Priti Patel been at it again? |
|
By:
Who cares
The whole thing is a joke anyway |
|
By:
550 deaths over time as designated by other than nhs,so instead of added to todays numbers ,added to overall total,but figures correct
|
|
By:
So still plucking deaths out of thin air then
|
|
By:
I didn't hear the actual broadcast, but did he actually say "111 deaths" ? If so, what could be the explanation for the discrepancy?
|
|
By:
just p[osted,non nhs deaths over past few weeks,months,care in community ,at home etc
|
|
By:
550 deaths over time as designated by other than nhs,so instead of added to todays numbers ,added to overall total,but figures correct
I see, |
|
By:
PA Media has obtained an explanation as to why today’s UK coronavirus death figures and yesterday’s don’t appear to add up. (See 5.55pm.) It reports.
The number of people in the UK who have died after testing positive for Covid-19 is 556 higher than the equivalent total announced yesterday, although the government is reporting the day-on-day change as 111. The reason for the difference in these two figures is to do with how deaths are being incorporated into historic data retrospectively. Yesterday’s cumulative total announced by the Department of Health was 38,489, which is 556 below today’s cumulative total of 39,045. But since yesterday, 445 deaths have been added to the historic data. These additional deaths are linked to cases that have been identified through testing that has been carried out by commercial partners, rather than testing that has been done in NHS and Public Health England laboratories. Rather than include these 445 deaths in today’s increase, the Department of Health has incorporated them within the previous cumulative total, to create a notional total for yesterday of 38,934 (38,489 + 445). The difference between this notional total of 38,934 and today’s total of 39,045 is 111, and this is the one being reported by the government. |
|
By:
Hide a few more bodies...
|
|
By:
It's still not exactly a reason for optimism though. We are going to be second only to Belgium quite soon, in terms of mortality per capita.
 |
|
By:
Lots of countries have been adjusting figures at times. The important figure here is the 111 and never forget like always its overstated as it includes people who died with COVID and not necessarily from it.
Would be great if we actually had some stats that showed how many people have actually died from it. |
|
By:
Clearly it isn't overstated if it's revised upwards without explanation
|
|
By:
have i missed anyfink?
|
|
By:
A further change to the reporting process was introduced on 1 June 2020 and affected data from 24 May onwards. Deaths linked to cases identified through 'pillar 2' testing (see 'Total and daily UK cases' section on this page) are included as well as 'pillar 1' cases. All deaths before 24 May 2020 of people who tested positive through 'pillar 2' testing are included in the reported daily figure for 24 May 2020.
This change resulted in an additional 445 deaths being included (as at 1 June 2020). |
|
By:
I think you missed my point yhtl.
|
|
By:
"A further change to the reporting process"
Meaning we've been rumbled and need to try and keep it going despite being utterly inept at trying to do so More changes than a teenagers pants ffs |
|
By:
So did they fiddle figures down to ease lockdown or fiddle them up
to hide them 7 day rolling average was flat lining for 4 days before these 400 were added in |
|
By:
New and imaginative ways of twisting the truth. The "architecture" is there, and the "toolkits" are in place, so we can count our lucky stars.
|
|
By:
Up or down no one gives a fack anymore
Its gotten so boring as they stumble from one script to the next |
|
By:
The capacity to produce whatever figures suit their agenda
|
|
By:
The bulk of the adjustment goes back to 24 May, revised figure of 441 versus the previously reported 118.
Also daily differences on each day from 26 May. |
|
By:
I get the idea you are desperately trying to find a reason to stay scared yhtl. The explanation given makes perfect sense.
|