David Icke removed from Facebook

You are getting to the point where you should be ignored if this is your level

May 2, 2020 -- 4:00PM, Injera wrote:

Charlie - you agree with Ofcom and Facebook that Icke poses a threat to people’s health.I assume you also agree that the WHO were endangering life when in January they said covid could not be passed from human to human? Should Tedros be censored and banned?"Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China," the organization had said.It also relied on information from Chinese health authorities who have been accused of obscuring facts and figures during the course of the outbreak.- how can the WHO have any credibility when they say things like this to the world. No one but Tedros trusts the Chinese. I wonder why....

wtf were they meant to do?  Call the Chinese liars when they had no evidence and were trying to get inspectors in the country?

Denzil - is that the first or second London Real interview? They should be easier to track down.
I'm sure you're aware there'll be another Brian Rose interview soon...is it tomorrow?

A_T the quote is below. They tweeted it the world.

Dave - er, verify for themselves?? They are the WHO not a cottage hospital on the outskirts of Milton Keynes. Send in their experts to ascertain the threat.

Tedros is China’s poodle. He has always been a danger to people’s health, especially his fellow Ethiopians.

Icke is the fairy godmother in comparison.

May 2, 2020 -- 4:29PM, Gibberish wrote:

Denzil - is that the first or second London Real interview? They should be easier to track down.I'm sure you're aware there'll be another Brian Rose interview soon...is it tomorrow?

That's the banned one the next is as you mention tomorrow 5pm

He's had at least 2 others maybe more I've been backwatching most things originally from smaller clips where I seem to notice the change in sweater colour

Denzil - that link I posted on the Alex Jones thread is well worth investigating if you ain't seen it.

“The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants” — Albert Camus

How come politicians and jounophiles opinions are not banned?

May 2, 2020 -- 4:42PM, Gibberish wrote:

Denzil - that link I posted on the Alex Jones thread is well worth investigating if you ain't seen it.

Will have a look later on thanks

May 2, 2020 -- 4:30PM, Injera wrote:

A_T the quote is below. They tweeted it the world.Dave - er, verify for themselves?? They are the WHO not a cottage hospital on the outskirts of Milton Keynes. Send in their experts to ascertain the threat.Tedros is China’s poodle. He has always been a danger to people’s health, especially his fellow Ethiopians.Icke is the fairy godmother in comparison.

can you read?

...Call the Chinese liars when they had no evidence and were trying to get inspectors in the country?

Why be rude dave? Where did I say the WHO should call China liars? Verify data before publishing myths to the world. If China refused entry, it’s pretty obvious they’d be hiding something!

Are you really that thick?

The right wing posters on here utterly incapable of researching anything and have the cheek to mouth off about the "msm narrative".

Can't fault his line of reason there dave tbf. If they wouldn't let the WHO inspect surely there was a stench of rat, that's when they should have called them out.

A_T the quote is below. They tweeted it the world.


the WHO never said it couldn't be transferred from human to human

The right wing posters on here utterly incapable of researching anything and have the cheek to mouth off about the "msm narrative".


Absolutely. With such poor analytical skills it's easy to see how things like Brexit, Trump, etc. got voted in.

Too many won’t say anything bad about Tedros nor the WHO nor the Chinese.

The same people who accept  covid related deaths as covid deaths.

The WHO tweeted China’s view without verification. Do you not see how utterly irresponsible that is?

Why the defence of China and Tedros? China allowed flights out of Wuhan knowing damn well it was infectious between people.

was bizarre of the WHO to say it couldnt be passed from human to human when it clearly could lol, some mugs in charge there

they didn't say that.

let's examine the reasoning here...

"I'm going to ignore the world's scientists and instead believe a man who wears a turquiouse tracksuit and thinks the world is ruled by lizards from another planet."

May 2, 2020 -- 5:59PM, Injera wrote:

The WHO tweeted China’s view without verification. Do you not see how utterly irresponsible that is? Why the defence of China and Tedros? China allowed flights out of Wuhan knowing damn well it was infectious between people.

I repeat


wtf were they meant to do?  Call the Chinese liars when they had no evidence and were trying to get inspectors in the country?

Well yes. Involve other governments and force their hand instead of passing on their disinformation and hoping.

Icke: "there is no covid19 it doesn't exist". Thank you Dr Icke. Courtesy his video.

C'Mon,1357, Try harder to articulate a meaningful reply, you must have more than that.

Stop throwing crap at every other post,your better than that.           

Your suggesting the WHO had no choice but to repeat china's position is absurd and quite frankly ridiculous.

It is a weak defence. The WHO should have put out an official statement saying China would not allow inspectors in. That was the truth at that time, and world leaders could have taken a view on it.

May 2, 2020 -- 6:45PM, Charlie wrote:

Icke: "there is no covid19 it doesn't exist". Thank you Dr Icke. Courtesy his video.

Excellent . Now quote the bit about 5G causing COVID-19 . Thanks in advance

I'm surprised his site isn't closed down. It's full of sh!te. Conspiritards use his arguments not their own. What a great source of inspiration.

I'm also surprised . Yes , it is full of sh!te , as you say , but you are only aware of that because you are free to view it .
The main point is whether you have the right to form that opinion for yourself or have someone else view it and make that judgement for you . I prefer to work things out for myself .

Analogy : "That Charlie fella talks a load of sh!te so I'm gonna ban Charlie from posting on Chit Chat"

What gives me the right to make that decision and deny others the opportunity to judge for themselves ?

Answer : Nothing gives me that right . Absolutely nothing !

Who suggested drinking bleach ?

Trump

I must've missed that

If I was to post something like I suggest you go around and eat your neighbors then I would expect to be banned. And locked up. If I was to post that vaccines aren't useful so don't have them and thousands if not millions of people die because of that I'd expect the same.

Charlie • May 2, 2020 7:27 PM BST
If you watch his video, at the start he's talking about covid, from about 50 minutes he's associating 5G with medical disasters which have, apparently, gone on since the Spanish Flu because of technological advances. At the same time he's talking about covid so the implication should be obvious.

You work it out for yourself and drink some bleach to help.



Should you be deplatformed for this then ?

If you wish.

You seem to be a master of taking things out of context so I'll restate you are a tw@t. A bigger tw@t than I thought.

Why would I wish it ? I may not agree with what you say , but I absolutely defend your right to say it

Resorting to insults and name calling simply because your argument is failing is fine by me

Where is the lack of context ? I posted the entire quote

Ok, play dumb. It suits you.

At least I'm only playing dumb , eh ?

That was a compliment. There are several stages below dumb.

Keep digging lad . There's Gold down there somewhere

I'd have to dig a long way to find some kind of intelligence in you.

I can trade insults all day but a bit bored now. Come back with some facts.

I haven't traded any insults . That's your forte

How about you come back with some accurate quotes ?

About Icke or you?

Which of us are you more obsessed by ?

There NEVER has been an isolated virus only genetic material recovered from 7 of the original 198 at Wuhan wet market in which the RNA was separated along with other genetic material present in the lungs including sputum and exosomes which then became the test hence the test lottery,false positives and negatives galore.
It's DNA is less than 80% SARS yet it's supposed to be a SARS 2,we humans are share 60% DNA with fruit flies,65% with mice,96% with chimps are we named any of those things - no and to this day there has been NO ISOLATED VIRUS.

I couldn't watch the whole video in his website because it kept crashing my browser (one for the conspiracist) but go to around 35 minutes

he said that weekly death figures are being inflated because the 'cult' are basically murdering people by getting relatives to sign 'do not resuscitate' forms which is some accusation, why not let him onto mainstream TV to be challenged on it.

darren the DNR scenario has been established low key in the mainstream weeks ago

https://www.ageuk.org.uk/latest-press/articles/2020/04/age-uk-response-to-dnr-forms/

Summit Like a wogan show?

Norton?  Ross?   Ant and Dec?

I know a lady who is well but received  ‘the letter’ advising 12 weeks isolation. Included was a DNR form.

I have no idea if they keep statistics on such a thing when it comes to recording how many DNACPR forms are issued but coming from a reputable charity such as ageuk means it really demands an official answer/enquiry from the government. Because the weekly death toll for week 14, 15 and 16 (til April 17) this year is 6, 8, 12 thousand more than the previous 5 year average for England and Wales, either people are dying from this strain of Corona Virus or they are dying of more typical natural causes prematurely thanks to a lack of medical effort, CPR is performed on patients who's heart stops beating or stop breathing, around 3500 people a week in the UK as a whole die from heart or circulatory disease, not sure what the death rates are for heart failure deaths during the same period from week 14 to 16 was, the forms are issued by GP's, read links that said many were sent to the home addresses of elderly patients underlining positive reasons to sign such as freeing up ICU beds. Would GP's really take this upon themselves to do or more likely, they are being encouraged to send them from central government, as from the links I read were reported all over the country of GP's actively sending them out.

What has banning his online presence going to achive? if anything its reverse psychology

I thought that too only now Icke is far more popular than he was with much of what he's been saying for the last 30 years coming to fruition the numbers are too high hence why the mainstream HAD to tell lies about what he said.
They also took down work of people on his Ickonic platform on completely unrelated topics they are trying to get him.

channel deleted by youtube today

May 2, 2020 -- 9:24PM, macarony wrote:

What has banning his online presence going to achive? if anything its reverse psychology

It's probably too late now (though better late than never), but the idea is you stop the spread of this utter bs at source you stop the brainwashing of the idiots buying into it who then become a danger to society. The spread of uncontested fake news/conspiracy bullsh*t has increasingly become a threat in the social media era.

The bans are counter-productive to their cause as they always draws more attention to whatever 'they' don't want you
to see/hear/know - everyone is well aware Icke's already got his own website (as has Alex Jones & Tommy Robinson) so
whatever they're removing will unintentionally introduce the 'protected souls' (when they search) to even more of
the 'toxic' material they're blacklisting - and besides...it's all available on Bitchute too.

There's no point is mass censorship...it just encourages The Streisand Effect - it'll be coming out in spades later on
today when Icke has round III with Brian Rose of London real - 5pm I think. Check on how many will tune in...it'll be
record breaking because people are now curious...all thanks to the big tech companies

It's just like those two doctors videos...I wouldn't have known about them but for the ban - so fcuk you censors and
many thanks for the inadvertent recommendation

The last few months have been very instructive.   When it comes to questions relating to freedom of speech, government infringement on "inalienable" rights,  civil disobedience etc  society's response(well that of the overwhelming  majority it seems)has sadden me. Sleeping walking our way into a police state.

It's probably too late now (though better late than never), but the idea is you stop the spread of this utter bs at source you stop the brainwashing of the idiots buying into it who then become a danger to society.

and Facebook as a private company do not want to be held liable for hosting his dangerous nonsense.

it's not about free speech - Icke is free to spout his nonsense on the internet if he chooses

Would be great to have him on at 5 pm tonight and pitch him up against the podium preachers of the gospel according to the narrative.

I think i know who would be winning that one and i am not even his greatest fan...  hey ho

Just having a quick flick through... moths to a flame

In America a company that has spent 4 years working on internal (in the body) ultraviolet treatments for viruses, has had its videos deleted by YouTube.

Now why would that be?

I am not sure what else Icke can add to his information since his last interview but i will be tuning it to find out today.

I am pleased that LR / BR have given him this platform but i do wonder if BR is somewhat an opportunist and floating it to suit his own interest ? Time will tell as it usually does

May 3, 2020 -- 10:40AM, Injera wrote:

In America a company that has spent 4 years working on internal (in the body) ultraviolet treatments for viruses, has had its videos deleted by YouTube.Now why would that be?

because they were snake oil sellers?

@edy

Oil. From farm to pharmaceutical, diesel truck to dinner plate, pipeline to plastic product, it is impossible to think of an area of our modern-day lives that is not affected by the petrochemical industry. The story of oil is the story of the modern world.

Parts of that story are well-known: Rockefeller and Standard Oil; the internal combustion engine and the transformation of global transport; the House of Saud and the oil wars in the Middle East.

Other parts are more obscure: the quest for oil and the outbreak of World War I; the petrochemical interests behind modern medicine; the Big Oil money behind the “Green Revolution” and the “Gene Revolution.”

But that story, properly told, begins somewhere unexpected. Not in Pennsylvania with the first commercial drilling operation and the first oil boom, but in the rural backwoods of early 19th century New York State. And it doesn’t start with crude oil or its derivatives, but a different product altogether: SNAKE OIL

“Dr. Bill Livingston, Celebrated Cancer Specialist” was the very image of the traveling snake oil salesman. He was neither a doctor nor a cancer specialist; his real name was not even Livingston. More to the point, the “Rock Oil” tonic he pawned was a useless mixture of laxative and petroleum and had no effect whatsoever on the cancer of the poor townsfolk he conned into buying it.

He lived the life of a vagabond, always on the run from the last group of people he had fooled, engaged in ever-more-outrageous deceptions to make sure that the past wouldn’t catch up with him. He abandoned his first wife and their six children to start a bigamous marriage in Canada at the same time as he fathered two more children by a third woman. He adopted the name “Livingston” after he was indicted for raping a girl in Cayuga in 1849.

When he wasn’t running away from them or disappearing for years at a time, he would teach his children the tricks of his treacherous trade. He once bragged of his parenting technique: “I cheat my boys every chance I get. I want to make ’em sharp.”

A towering man of over six feet and with natural good looks that he used to his advantage, he went by “Big Bill.” Others, less generously, called him “Devil Bill.” But his real name was William Avery Rockefeller, and it was his son, John D. Rockefeller, who would go on to found the Standard Oil monopoly and become the world’s first billionaire.

The world we live in today is the world created in “Devil” Bill’s image. It’s a world founded on treachery, deceit, and the naïveté of a public that has never wised up to the parlor tricks that the Rockefellers and their ilk have been using to shape the world for the past century and a half.

Getting it yet

yeah edy

The foundation of EVERYTHING we see today is built on the back of a Rockefeller who sold SNAKE OIL !!!!!

No more needs to be added really apart from the fact that so few want to admit it.

So here we are

John, it is big time uncool to steal content without even giving credit, i.e the source. Where did you copy that from?

May 3, 2020 -- 12:26PM, John.W.Henry. wrote:

The foundation of EVERYTHING we see today is built on the back of a Rockefeller who sold SNAKE OIL !!!!!No more needs to be added really apart from the fact that so few want to admit it. So here we are

it's even on wikipedia.

Sorry to tell you it's not something that's hidden from the public eye and you and your pals are on to it exclusively.

Wikipedia is run by the power hungry and the elites on there determine what and what can be published too, is John giving us MSM/establishment spin

yes, he is.

He's just another shill of the elites.

edy - Bioscience AYTU. They’re on the Nasdaq I believe. It’s called micro light. Similar to a breathing tube with uv light inside. The company’s video demonstrating the possibility was removed by YouTube.

https://aytu-ugrgkocy.stackpathdns.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Treatment-Rationale-Animation-Stills-HEA1001.pdf

I'm sure they will be allowed back to advertise their product once it's been shown to actually work and be safe.

Or when people aren't desperate.

What were you getting at with your rhetorical question of "Now why would that be"?

Not rhetorical. Why delete a video from a company showing a research programme which, in the future MAY be a breakthrough?

What do you think?

Abducted perhaps ?

"In America a company that has spent 4 years working on internal (in the body) ultraviolet treatments for viruses, has had its videos deleted by YouTube.

Now why would that be?"

Injera - I've heard people mention that and I'd like to see more - what's the title of that video? It could be on Bitchute.

"AYTU Healight"

A whole bunch of Trump sheeples got really super desperate to promote the video to say that their Lord and Master was right all along and that it's so so totes a treatment for covid-19. That's when YouTube stepped in.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/T4litigddBmH/

AYTU almost worthless - there's a reason for that

Getting ready for the live broadcast at 5pm

Edy - thanks mate...I'll watch that later

edy - leaving politics aside, it’s an encouraging development. Will it work? Maybe. For YouTube to take it down makes no sense.

May 3, 2020 -- 3:38PM, A_T wrote:

AYTU almost worthless - there's a reason for that

.

For YouTube to take it down makes no sense.

Google don't want to be liable in any way for hosting this kind of material

During a global pandemic it is irresponsible for sheeples to promote it for political reasons just so they can say "Look, Trump was right you meanie lefties!".

It is also irresponsible for a pennystock company to promote it as a treatment for covid-19 when there is no research at all regarding the application in the respiratory tract (and there being legitimate doubts about it applicability there)

In the end it's not much different to promoting the injection of ground down rhino penis into your pinky toe as the wonder cure for covid-19.

Which, coincidentally, is probably what traditional Chinese medicine would indeed promote as a cure.

Not sure what happened to Icke - I remember him as a sports presenter on BBC - seemed like a genuinely warm human being.

May want to cheer up....