|
By:
And a dangerous nutter at that.
|
|
By:
I watched it...I did not pick up on that???
I thought he was complaining about the amount of government control us, through the use of cards not cash, mobile phones, etc Still I am always the last to know There is a big difference between government controlling people and deliberately killing people with a virus, which I would not believe?? |
|
By:
How has Icke got away with this.
Surely he has committed a crime if had "potential to cause harm to viewers" ? Most of our laws are to protect people or property. Guess the CPS know more about the law - hope they are looking at the evidence. He is dangerous. |
|
By:
Its only when you read Wiki that you understand how mad he really is!
The mind boggles when you try to read it all ... How the feck does he make it all up ... and the sad thing is he actually has people who believe him! |
|
By:
He was once a spokesman for the Green Party.
![]() |
|
By:
I suspect that part of his punishment was to have his forum account closed on here, hence the demise of terry McCann
![]() |
|
By:
angoose |
|
By:
He's a very sane person, conspiracies are his income, inducing outrage is his forte and it works.
He's also entitled to say what he thinks and attempts to silence him is not only against free speech but it give further credence to the argument the 'truth' is being covered up. |
|
By:
he can say what he wants to his target audience but it doesn't need to be broadcast on telly or radio ...
|
|
By:
I agree darren
|
|
By:
He can't say what he wants if it is against the law.
Many people have been invited to attend a UK court because they said what they wanted. The American term is " shouting fire in a crowded theatre " . |
|
By:
does he live in the UK Mexico?
|
|
By:
He went from worthy but dull sports presenter to camping out on the edge of reality almost overnight with his Turquoise & Lizards.It's a bizarre story, I have no answers.
|
|
By:
If I saw his bank account I may have more answers, is he coining it in?
|
|
By:
I think he lives in UK lurka .
Although can still commit a crime in UK if not physically present in UK. Could still stick out an arrest warrant if he is somewhere else. Of course not valid if CPS/ police not interested in the case. |
|
By:
send more money to fight the potential court case ....
|
|
By:
Bizarre language from Ofcom. Damning of free speech. Damning too of the public’s ability to listen and make up their own minds.
Language of a state wanting more censorship. |
|
By:
he can say what he wants to his target audience but it doesn't need to be broadcast on telly or radio ... Why? I want to know what he has to say for a start. They let Dorris and Chump lie deliberately. Does Icke lie or speak what he thinks is true? I would like to hear him specially about cashless society and 5G I don’t believe the Government Liars. The Chancellor just said they had been making the right decisions at the right time. That is a blatant lie. Maybe I should ring Offcom |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Too true WD.
The deplatforming of people with different views is a real worry. The so called mainstream plus MPs can say what they like but God forbid any of us question the narrative. Would Ofcom allow discussion on George Orwell I wonder.... |
|
By:
does icke think its true or something to con folk
no better than a call centre scammer |
|
By:
Shut him down,Shut Tommy Robinson down,Shut Paul Watson down,Shut Peter Hitchins down,Shut Trevor Kavanagh down,Shut Brendan O'Neil down..all have voices but we are discouraged from hearing them.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
*lives
|
|
By:
didn't he play in goal for coventry
|
|
By:
Of course Icke is a nutter but London Live should be able to broadcast what they like.
Very sinister ruling |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Twizzle - that's so right...where does the line get drawn? As all those you mentioned have said...it's US average folk who are next - very sinister indeed.
As for where Dave lives...in a modest one bedroom flat on the Isle Of Wight - and drives a normal used car. Not what the media have told us all in that he's got a fleet of luxury motors and lives in a mansion - ill-gotten gains from his scamming ![]() Just par for the course MSM scum búllshít as ever. |
|
By:
Are people still listening to this tool, after all these years? Unbelievable!
![]() |
|
By:
ehamon holmes is
|
|
By:
He's not dangerous.
The real danger is that people will be unable to unpack the strands of truth from the head-spinning candy floss. |
|
By:
I thought his people in power are lizards thing was totally preposterous.
Then Chris Witty started appearing on news bulletins ![]() |
|
By:
Isn't he more turtle than lizard?
|
|
By:
I don't think we need to OFCOM to confirm he is a nutter. It's quite lucrative though.....
He once claimed he’s the Son of God and says the world is run by alien lizards. But the story of David Icke’s marriage breakdown is almost as weird THE audience at the theatre in Times Square, New York, sat in reverential silence as David Icke took the stage and made his great revelation. Our planet, he declared, is secretly ruled by a race of reptile-like aliens. These reptiles, malevolent in nature, sometimes ‘shape-shift’ into human form. The Queen, for example, is a reptilian, President Barack Obama another. Bonkers, yes. But Icke’s show in November (2011), with tickets costing $50 (£32) a head, was a sell-out, as have been most of the other dates on his world tour, which ends in Britain later this year. Wherever he goes, thousands flock to see him. Twenty years after the famous TV interview on Wogan, when the once-respected sports commentator became a national laughing stock for saying he was the Son of God, Icke’s brand of loopiness has proved more resilient and lucrative than anyone could have guessed. |
|
By:
He's got a few disciples on here judging by some of the posts.
|
|
By:
why are they so scared of what he has to say?
|
|
By:
all goalies are nuts
Hereford too i believe |
|
By:
As a Royal mail employee Ike makes far more sense than those R Souls at ofcom
|
|
By:
Icke will always split opinion.
I never used to consider his worth due to the baggage he carried with him from earlier in his journey, however, I have had to reconsider my opinion over the past year or so as he appears to be on the right side of many things. I still do not agree with everything he states as i think his hypothesis sometimes strays away from the evidence he has uncovered. That is probably me nit picking The mere fact that Ofcom are censoring him only endorses the fact that he is hitting nerves and that they want to try and suppress his opinion. Ask yourself this, If he is so outlandishly wrong why not get him on national TV and discredit him in front of the millions that would watch ??? ![]() ![]() ![]() |