|
By:
This will deeply upset angoose, who only ever seems to post really negative stories
I'm sure he'll find something to post about though |
|
By:
"only" 159 deaths today, the doom merchants will be getting upset
For some reason people are only interested in negative stories |
|
By:
How many today ??
|
|
By:
Thanks son Crossed Post
|
|
By:
The number of people who have died in England after contracting coronavirus is now 1,284, a rise of 159, NHS England said.
Those who died were aged between 32 and 98 years old. Almost all patients had underlying health conditions – the four people who did not were aged between 56 and 87 years old. |
|
By:
Assuming a daily death number of 1500, it’s 10.6%
Spare a thought for the other 89%..... |
|
By:
I have no doubt this thing is real and people need to stay home and keep their distance, the numbers will flatten out much quicker
China are still the winners though by a fair way, that's the model that we need to take in future |
|
By:
Do people think these numbers are flattening out already? they don't seem to be spiking like Spain or Italy
|
|
By:
Like I said on other threads, I'd treat figures reported from the weekend with a bit of caution. These are when the deaths are registered, not when they actually occured.
|
|
By:
Cider
I expected more deaths today, probably 250+ But this isn't over yet hence the excel centre being opened |
|
By:
do not believe anything about these listed 'cases'
|
|
By:
I don't think I had it but took no chances stayed indoors
The cough panicked me enough to do that |
|
By:
The Nightingale is some extremely impressive work to be fair.
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
Just intuitively, less people work on the weekends, especially admin types.
|
|
By:
Feels like that to me as well, another reason to take a longer view of the figures, day to day will invariably include apparently odd fluctuations.
|
|
By:
So Monday is a low day for that reason, cider?
I'm expecting a big jump tomorrow, probably over 300 |
|
By:
nah!! goosebump - you just love the attention and think you might be a bit above the rest of us but you are just copying and posting your guardian and bbc items (same thing ) ho ho
you get so excited with new lots of deaths and report them a bit weird isn't it |
|
By:
styill having hospital capacity even in London is the suprising,encouraging figure
|
|
By:
Just my own hypothesis and looking at the pattern of the figures reported (before any heroes jump in, I realise these are real people passing away, we have to detach emotion from the stats).
|
|
By:
if true!! goosebrain will be sagging in his chair - no longer able to post sensationalising panic driven figures
back to brexit and guardian/bbc copies and pastes |
|
By:
Where’s the capacity info?
|
|
By:
The patients were aged between 32 and 98 years old and all but four, aged between 56 and 87 years old, had underlying health conditions, according to the PA Media news agency.
|
|
By:
180 deaths in the UK today.
|
|
By:
dr in press conference yesterday,stephen just said 9,000 hospitalised corona cases
|
|
By:
On a negative , Yesterday was a 23 hour Day ? Never the Less I was expecting a figure of 250- 300
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
More than 9,000 people who have tested positive for Covid-19 are currently being treated in hospitals across England, NHS England’s chief executive Sir Simon Stevens has said.
Stevens added that the number of patients was expected to increase, but services set up to provide additional capacity would be available later this week, during a visit to the new NHS Nightingale Hospital in London. Speaking to the BBC, he said: Today there are over 9,000 positive coronavirus patients in hospitals across England and we know that number is only going to increase. “That’s why what you see here is a mass mobilisation, taking place right across the country, but also at these new Nightingale hospitals. “This has been an extraordinary team effort on the part of nurses and doctors and therapists and pharmacists across London, but also volunteers and paramedics and people returning to help. “And when these services are needed, they will be available beginning later this week, and because this is a global health emergency we’re actually seeing similar types of hospitals being established in Berlin and Madrid and New York.” Stevens added that NHS England would be able to double the number of coronavirus tests it has available for staff by the end of the week. |
|
By:
Inj correct the Figure is 180 the other figure is England only
|
|
By:
Within a couple of Weeks a test should hopefully become more available ???
|
|
By:
he really cannot help it - a sad individual - repeating published info - amazing scenes
|
|
By:
South Korea's Motto has been TEST TEST TEST they have have kept the numbers down ..
|
|
By:
Angoose needed to find some doom bless him
180 deaths isn't enough for him |
|
By:
But it does not give us a real-time snapshot of the number of coronavirus-related deaths in the UK, nor is it an accurate reflection of exactly where the UK is in the 'curve' of the outbreak.
There are a number of reasons for this. First, the numbers that are published each day include deaths that have occurred day, if not weeks earlier. The list of deaths announced by NHS England in its bulletin of March 29 included deaths that were recorded as taking place as far back as March 16. A death is only included in the figures once families of the victim have been informed. So the day-on-day change in the official death figures is not moving in step with how many coronavirus-related deaths are taking place in real time. Secondly, deaths being included in the official total are focused on those that have taken place in hospitals in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. These provide the most immediate sources of data for the Department of Health, and which are then used for the daily updates. NHS England, for instance, publishes a daily breakdown of coronavirus-related deaths in England by NHS Trust. Deaths that have occurred in the wider community are not included. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) publishes weekly provisional figures on the total number of deaths registered in England and Wales, including the wider community, as well as whether the underlying cause of death is a respiratory disease. But there is a lag in these figures of about 11 days - the latest ONS bulletin, published on March 24, had numbers up to the week ending March 13. These figures are also based on when a death is registered, not when it occurred. A third reason the official death figures do not give a real-time snapshot of where we are in the 'curve' of the outbreak is due to the amount of time that can pass between somebody contracting the virus and them losing their life through a coronavirus-related death. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8167719/20-patients-die-coronavirus-Scotland-Wales-UKs-death-toll-jumps-1-241.html |
|
By:
https://youtu.be/va6nPu-1auE
Angoose when he finds his doom info |
|
By:
SontaranStratagem • March 30, 2020 3:54 PM BST
Cider I expected more deaths today, probably 250+ SontaranStratagem • March 30, 2020 4:01 PM BST So Monday is a low day for that reason, cider? I'm expecting a big jump tomorrow, probably over 300 |
|
By:
Read what you write.
|
|
By:
Just intuitively, less people work on the weekends, especially admin types.
___________________________________ fewer |
|
By:
death figures will pop up and down on some days ..they did in Lombarby
|
|
By:
Don't worry goose you'll get your doom throughout this
|