Looking at the Mail (that is loving this) and reading it's latest outrage as it is trying to get people annoyed at other people for taking their dogs for a walk in remote places where nobody else is like up mountains. That you'd obviously think is a lot safer than their local park where others are walking dogs and jogging and walking.. and it occured to me looking at thier usual pile of pathetic pap-shots of celebrities ..
Does the Daily Mail think the paparazi are "essential workers" immune to corona? These ars*holes travelling around with DLSRs following Declan Donnely and his wife down the street snapping away (or Amanda Holden, or Ashley Roberts, Casey Afleck or any of the other B/C/Z list celebs they're paying photographers to follow), the list in the side bar goes on and on and on) -are they doing essential work? I've heard of some pretty impressive lens technology in my time but I find it unlikely these paps are taking these photos from their living room.
Maybe being a pap makes you an honourary NHS hero?
Did you are did you not say that it was interesting on two or three occasions?
Do you want me to paste your posts?
I now have 3 family members tested positive with C19 - 39, 40 and 15
I can insure you that it is anything but interesting.
You obviously didn`t see my post before posting your mock Daily Mail headline 15-year-old dies of Coronavirus
That wasn`t good reading or funny for I or anyone in a similar position.
Problem is you open your big attention seeking gub without thinking.
Like I say, you obviously didn`t see my post, but you are still a c***.
p.s. I am 6ft 2in so not exactly little unless you are taller. Everybody who disagrees with you or points out your contradictions are trolls. WAC.
Did you are did you not say that it was interesting on two or three occasions?Do you want me to paste your posts?I now have 3 family members tested positive with C19 - 39, 40 and 15I can insure you that it is anything but interesting.You obviously di
I mocked the daily mail and it's hysterical OTT handling of this situation, not you or your family, as is clear to anyone who read it. You were not even a billion miles from my radar as I didn't even know you still posted.
To use that to play some sort of victimhood to try and twist it to have a go at me as if I've done anything wrong (when I haven't) is .. pathetic. Scottish nat who seeks and finds victimhood in anything to go into manufactured outrage, who've thought they possessed such a psychology.
BTW in case you missed it this forum has been full of 100s of outrageous and ridiculous posts on this subject, often idiotic and actually offensive, Why not pick on them?
I mocked the daily mail and it's hysterical OTT handling of this situation, not you or your family, as is clear to anyone who read it. You were not even a billion miles from my radar as I didn't even know you still posted.To use that to play some sor
What they don't know is whether these people out strolling with their pets have already had the virus. The NHS guidelines state that after 7 days if you haven't got a fever then there's no need to self-isolate.
How long to self-isolate If you have symptoms
If you have symptoms of coronavirus, you'll need to self-isolate for 7 days.
After 7 days:
if you do not have a high temperature, you do not need to self-isolate if you still have a high temperature, keep self-isolating until your temperature returns to normal
You do not need to self-isolate if you just have a cough after 7 days. A cough can last for several weeks after the infection has gone.
What they don't know is whether these people out strolling with their pets have already had the virus.The NHS guidelines state that after 7 days if you haven't got a fever then there's no need to self-isolate.How long to self-isolateIf you have sympt
I actually acknowledged that you obviously didn`t see my earlier post, but obviously you never read it correctly or chose to ignore and I never ever suggested that your comments were directed at I.
Merely pointing out the stupidity of them in reply to your pathetic initial response on this thread. You start a thread and imply that the Daily Mail are loving the current situation (DISGUSTING) yet it is on record that you admit that you find it interesting (FACT). You merited the response.
Now you reply to suggest that I am playing the victim and end your post suggesting that you are the victim of I
Indeed there are 100s of outrageous and ridiculous posts on this subject, but, correct me if I`m wrong, you are the only poster on here who has stated, on more than one occasion, that you find the current situation interesting. That is the most pathetic comment EVER, coming from a poster who has used the word PATHETIC in numerous replies to posters disagreeing with you.
Nobody in the history of the forum has started so many contradictory threads. The Mother of all contradictions though, was the fantasy thread how Corbyn and the Labour party would have handled the current situation. Started purely to vilify Jeremy Corbyn and the Labour Party, then near the end you state in an attempt at crawling, "YES Poster, I definitely believe that people are POLITICISING the C19 situation". Oh the irony. Then you reply on this thread to I, pathetic. Scottish nat One honestly couldn`t make it up!
Anyway, I`m done. Got enough problems and can`t waste my time arguing with a bitter, twisted, hate fuelled DUMPLIN.
I sincerely hope that you and your family and all forumites stay safe and keep clear of this dreaded virus.
I actually acknowledged that you obviously didn`t see my earlier post, but obviously you never read it correctly or chose to ignore and I never ever suggested that your comments were directed at I. Merely pointing out the stupidity of them in reply t