Sobering CCP virus stats from LA

The link is a bit misleading, in one paragraph it says the patient died From Corona virus, then in the next it says it has not been revealed whether the person had underlying health condition which could then mean the person died with it instead of from

I'd imagine Los Angeles has a younger population than most places, and it's a very vain city at that given the industry there, many young people will be voluntarily going in for testing hence more patients and probably all with no health issues will soon be ok.

Nothing misleading at all. Two statements of fact.
Then a number of lazy assumptions from you,

A child under 18 has died from the coronavirus in California, Los Angeles County health officials announced Tuesday.
“Tragically, one of the people who died was a person under the age of 18, a devastating reminder that COVID-19 infects people of all ages,” Dr. Barbara Ferrer, director of the County of Los Angeles Public Health Department, said at a news briefing.

The patient was from Lancaster, California, the county’s health department said in a press release. Ferrer did not provide more details such as the precise age of the patient or whether they had underlying health conditions. Representatives from the health department weren’t immediately available for further comment.


it says it there, it's not clear at all and it's contradictory, because in the first paragraph it says she died from the virus then went on to say in the next that it hasn't been revealed if they had underlying health issues which if true, as vast majority of cases, puts a completely different complexation on it, the LA figures are well out of sync with age demographics around the world of those who have tested positive so it's not lazy just stating the obvious.

Got 5G turned on there so no surprise,think Wuhan ffs.

Mar 24, 2020 -- 11:08PM, terry mccann wrote:

Got 5G turned on there so no surprise,think Wuhan ffs.

Well, that's a nutter blocked.

Yea Terry, give it a rest m8, time and place and it's not here or now. Time to get proactive posting, plenty time for all that later.

Died from COVID-19.
May or may not have had underlying health conditions, but no clarity provided.

As I said, two statements of fact.

*Proactivly

Matt Hancock delivered today’s coronavirus daily briefing.
It was not revealed if he was wearing Union Jack underpants.

Ffs they said elsewhere the 18yr old  had bronchitis when a kid, ffs, who didn't?

That was the claimed  "underlying"

If he hadn’t contracted COVID-19, is it more or less likely that he would still be alive?

You cannot say somebody died FROM something when you don't know if they had other health conditions that the person may have indeed died from so it's obviously misleading. You are basically guessing until it's known for sure.

sorry!!   it won't make me sober

A press release is made by the doctor responsible for the county that states that an 18 year old died as a result of contracting COVID-19.
That’s good enough for me.

underlying wotsits again though  following the panic induced narrative  - how clever of you

but that's not what is says, doesn't say the patient died as a result OF contracting, it say from!

now they are saying 20 million have got it

what else shall we make up today and stir it up

ps  I haven't had my letter although I am one of the 1  1/2   

does anyone have the number for car driving delivery drivers?

Is English your first language?
If not, then I can possibly understand why you are unable to interpret a simple news report.

A child under 18 has died from the coronavirus in California, Los Angeles County health officials announced Tuesday.

“Tragically, one of the people who died was a person under the age of 18, a devastating reminder that COVID-19 infects people of all ages,” Dr. Barbara Ferrer, director of the County of Los Angeles Public Health Department, said at a news briefing.

california is not in england

lets whip it up eh!!??   how about one in iran or china or anywhere

you are joining the sky pandemiccrisispanic

angoose is what we used to call a 'panic bosun' type

and don't go stroking dogs!!!

The fact it was not revealed if the patient had underlying health issues leaves it open that it was with and not necessarily from, there could be reasons why it was said it was from, given it came from a health professional who wants as many people as possible to take the virus seriously so as not have so many patients walking in and overburdening them with symptoms when it could be symptoms of anything.

The main point being - is that still the vast majority of deaths are people who have underlying health issues and/or the elderly, I don't think it's worth panicking people when you find isolated cases of the young, as it transpires this patient may have had bronchitis ?