Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
11 Feb 20
15:12
Joined:
Date Joined:
26 Jan 05
On the BBC -of course.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 22
|
By:
the small screen
|
|
By:
Its not even open up for debate anymore-the MSM have seen to that,the old tatic of saying the same thing over and over again till people believe it
|
|
By:
I wonder if they will ask her opinion on the hockey stick science of yesteryear
 |
|
By:
Nice to see the license fee put to good use.
|
|
By:
"Coincidence"?
"Agenda 2030-UN plan to transform society into a centralised tyranny justified by "Climate Change" "Year 2030-whwn human brains are planned to be connected to AI" "12 years to save the planet from "Global Warming" 2030/31". "Coincidence"? "No chance. |
|
By:
It's no surprise the taxpayer funded BBC is paying a small fortune to this Swedish opportunist child to make a series of programmes that few will ever watch.
This should set the little sly looking plain-Jane up for life. |
|
By:
But its ruined her life,maybe she should have been born in India and ended up working in a slave/sweat shop or looking for food on tip sites to really know what a hopeless ruined childhood must feel like. To be fair to the kid,she is only repeating what she has been told to say.
|
|
By:
Climate change is real and it is time we got past "balancing" 95 per cent plus of scientists in the field with a few sceptical journalists, retired politicians and cranks funded by American billionaires who just happen to own coal mines or the like.
But I do not really see the point of this programme. Greta is just the other side of the sceptical hacks. She is not an expert. Her role is to get people to pay attention and commit to action. The government is already on board. It is time for Greta to retire. Is she being lined up as the likely replacement for David Attenborough? (Blimey: DA is 93, the same age as the Queen.) What is the point of the new programme? |
|
By:
To ruin all the other kids childhoods?
|
|
By:
How to steal a future ?
|
|
By:
Climate change is real and it is time we got past "balancing" 95 per cent plus of scientists
That's 95% of scientists out of the 30% who responded yes, when they were asked do they believe that man can influence the climate? Which is a long way from them saying that man is responsible for any climate change that occurs. The other 70% didn't even bother to reply. It's easy to fool the masses. |
|
By:
Attenborough simply makes programmes for money.
You can be sure little sly-eyes Greta is doing it purely for money as well. . |
|
By:
It is when you try and boy do they.
|
|
By:
It would be interesting if another channel were to put on a show presenting the exact opposite of what Greta will peddle, at exactly the same time as Greta is on the BBC.
|
|
By:
Agony column in one of the weekend magazines had a letter from a teenager suffering from depression because of climate change fear. Wondering how many kids lives are getting ruined by this propaganda.
|
|
By:
Thunberg came to prominence after organising a school strike against the climate crisis in 2018, under the banner Fridays for Future
F = the 6th letter of the alphabet FFF = 666 |
|
By:
urging children to go on strike and telling people to break the law to achieve their aims - what could possibly go wrong
|
|
By:
People have had enuff of Listening to Luvvie Bollix , all they have left to push is Climate Shyte
Which is caused by population Growth , no other reason |
|
By:
|
|
By:
Make my Hay,well spotted,evil rules in these dark times.
|
|
By:
Thank God we still have guys like Richie Allen plus great guests to listen too,but Johnson and co are now doing their worst to shut them all down,when free speech is taken away whats left?
|
|
By:
Good Video featuring some of the usual suspects "Dr. Jacob Nordangard-Climate Change, A.I. World Order and Rockefeller (Age of Truth TV)"
|
