Harry and Megan

Germaine Greer called it : "I think she’ll bolt. I hope in a way that she’ll bolt but maybe she’ll take Harry with her.”

yes I remember her saying that

Thread title is wrong. It should be Megan and Harry.

Indeed Nebs, my thoughts exactly. He needs to find out where she has hidden his Alberts and get a surgeon to sew them back on.

I think his  Alberts are pounding down on Megan most Nights Slippy.

Anyone paying £90 to watch two matches involving three Dutchmen you've never heard of, and a pensioner from an 80's comedy film?

Probably only the mentally ill Belgian "superfan".  Everyone else there is on a friends & family comp ticket, or got one of the giveaways in the past 24 hours.

Oops, this isn't the darts thread

better arrows needed

Allaboutmeagain's fkd off to Canada

Jan 9, 2020 -- 8:03PM, Danno wrote:

Oops, this isn't the darts thread

sky presenter desperately trying to argue the meghan case hahaha

harry been left to sort mess out ?

Piers Morgan mail online sees though the two of them rather well I thought.

Harry needs to have it explained to him by his brother, (step?)father and grandmother in a clear and concise way that his services are no longer required and that he will be facking orf on a one way ticket to Canada within a week.  Imho.

Welcome back, btw Morph

Suggested in some report that Harry was bored with the gig himself and glad of an excuse to feck orf.

Seems the Sun's scoop on Wednesday created a rushed announcement.

No problem but none of this 50/50 having their cake and eating it nonsense.

Immense shame on them for not informing the Queen first, btw

What's this website they secretly spent plenty of time painstakingly creating before the announcement?  Sussexroyal or summat.  I'd post a link but I'll not be promoting it anymore than I already have

Oh go on then

https://sussexroyal.com/about/

Fkn DISGRACEFUL!!!

When Harry said that famous line "What Meghan wants, Meghan gets" it conjurefd up an image of a plaque on Meghan's bedroom wall with a ginger-haired scrotum nailed to it

https://sussexexroyal.com/about/
Shirley

royal family,taxpayers money apart,its a coooont of a stunt to play on any 90 yr old grandmother,taking grandkid to another country at a days notice

fair point, but its only a great grandchild - and its not as if they won't be back..

not as if Liz won't be required for daily child care any more..

Granny hated Diana...Getting her just deserts.

I don't think the majority of this country wants to be represented by people like Harry and Megan, good riddance.

The absence of their photo on the table Chrissy Day was telling.

The Queen KNEW.

trilby22 10 Jan 20 11:47 
No problem but none of this 50/50 having their cake and eating it nonsense.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh the irony.   Think Britain as a whole has been also been told this elsewhere


Harry and Megan -  couldn't give a flying f*ck one way or the other. Might seem to be a self-contradictory opnion but I don't "believe" in the monarchy - it really is a pile of antiquated nonsense, however it is a link with a historical past and should be preserved on that basis though the civil list, their various benefits and the number of hangers-on needs to be seriously curtailed.

Message to H&M and the EU: No deal!

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/royal-family/steely-eyed-queen-is-seen-for-first-time-since-prince-harry-announced-he-and-meghan-markle-will-quit-the-royal-family-as-crisis-talks-with-prince-charles-and-prince-william-continue/ar-BBYPrPF?
.
GSTQ and fk the republicans.  Who would they vote for Pres?  Jezzbollah?

Totally agree the Royal family need cutting back though.  As I've said many a time, King Billy is the future

Jean?

So much for being financially independent! UK taxpayers will still pay h n m" £600,000 security and £130.000 travel costs" while they get £2.3 Million from Charles duchy (YOU in effect)

However you dress it up, Queen included, Charles included, its all from us.  All our money.

I don't care wot all you nation haters say  - I WOOD

Didn't realise you had a thing for ginners.

I don't think she realized what she was getting herself into, and as already mentioned on here Germaine Greer predicted nearly 2 years ago that "She'll bolt"

Harry might not be too bright, but even he said it himself speaking to his staff "Whatever Megan wants, Megan GETS !”

I am grateful for anything I can get xxxx

the truth will come out shortly,, charlie is not the daddy,,

harry on his way out,,,

goal disallowed by VAR west ham scored but got binned for handball!!!!   now that IS news

Recovered yet Mo? I cashed early so was spared the palpitations. All's well that ends well.

I just love VAR   best thing ever invented.   However my winnings will not cover the heart operation !!!   

but really I  hope they just get rid of the system though

Yes,  VARy frustrating. Two equalisers disallowed. I was convinced it would end a draw so took a smaller profit. It's a dangerous strategy unless you avoid an equivalent percentage of losers over a season.

Sadly I mentioned it after the Andrew business..

I cannot see the Queen lasting until 2021. Stress and age will take it's toll on the poor woman. She is a great servant to the British and the Empire.

All 3 children have been divorced, neither son fit to be King.

And now her grand kids are causing her much pain.

Long live the Queen and I pray she lives as long as possible.


The whole family should show more respect to her.

You've omitted Edward, Diff.  Seems a decent enough lad quietly getting on with things in the background, not ruffling any feathers.

2021 might prove to be correct - she won't last forever and could well quietly stand down by then.

Hopefully Charles will do the right thing and pass the crown straight to William who I feel would make a fine king.  Yes, he would give the Firm a jolly good tree shake too, as without one, it will crumble to dust, imo..

GSTQ & GSTfutureK.

Two jolly good reads here -

https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/01/10/megxit-was-not-driven-by-racism/
.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2020/01/09/a-woke-wallis-simpson/
.
For those unaware, Spiked sent out a free weekly e-mail on Fridays full of the weeks most relevant topics.  Well recommended.

https://www.spiked-online.com/

I cannot see the Queen lasting until 2021

Actually, on second thoughts and given Her health remains intact, I'll go for post-6th Feb 2022.  For two obvious reasons

I remember getting up ne chilly morning and my mother telling me that the King is dead. It felt strange and disconcerting although I was too young to understand what it meant if anything. It must have been the solemn tone in which she said it. I think you are right Trilby, an important milestone for her.

good idea this flying across the atlantic separately puts up their carbon fooitprint again,i,m sure these 2 loons are trying to top the A list carbon footprint league,

Showdown at Sandringham on Monday.

Queen, Charles, William and Harry.  Megan telling Harry what to say by phone.

Probably be a representative of the British taxpayer present also.

Jan 12, 2020 -- 11:17AM, Jack Hacksaw wrote:

Showdown at Sandringham on Monday.Queen, Charles, William and Harry.  Megan telling Harry what to say by phone.Probably be a representative of the British taxpayer present also.

will var be avaialable ?

available*

Megan secret meet up with the wicked witch Clinton worries me

No surprise there mate.  No surprise at all

Never had you down as a hater Slippy.

but good bjs beat everything

JUDGEMENT DAY

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/royal-family/prince-harry-and-meghan-markle-feel-forced-out-by-bullying-william-friends-claim-as-deeply-hurt-queen-gathers-royals-for-megxit-summit-where-couple-will-be-warned-abdication-could-take-months/ar-BBYSXXy?
.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/royal-family/britains-racism-pantomime-now-starring-meghan-and-harry/ar-BBYTkQN?
.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/royal-family/buckingham-palace-fears-sussexes-could-go-public-with-damaging-accusations-if-plans-are-thwarted/ar-BBYSOJy?
.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/royal-family/prince-william-and-prince-harry-issue-joint-statement-denying-bullying-claims/ar-BBYU04W?
.

He’s a bit dim and lazy and she’s greedy and rather unpleasant, seems she is very calculating and will use people to get what she wants. Look at those discarded so far when they serve no purpose. And now decides she cannot adjust to the Royal Family and wants to jump ship, but she knew the rules before she joined, and still trying to demand exactly what she wants.

William v Harry, trial by combat
If it all turns nasty and theres a punch up imo Harry wins but if they sort it out like gentlemen in a duel imo Williams stiff upper lip will see him through.Any markets up?

THEY DONT want to live in uk
they don't want to live in Canada,
but do want to live in  LA but not whilst trumps in charge,so if you nice americans would vote out trump we,ll move in ,in the meantime we,ll have to put up with Canada
if canadians are going to foot the bill to put up with these 2 ungrateful freeloaders they must be as barking as we are

A microcosm of the western male descent into wholesale cuckery. This is 100% down to Harry, needs to pull up the big boy pants and be a proper husband, someone that a wife can contend with, not this neutered embarrassment of politically correct wokeness. I’d be amazed if the marriage lasts until the end of the year.

so debbie, why did you marry millionaire paul daniels ?

because he made all my problems disappear ,

because I liked him,not a lot but I liked him

Worth 5 stars any day.....

Agree

And loves to play the race card,surplus to requirements the pair of them.

if arry as everyones seems to agree is both on the edge of cracking up and besotted at the same time,his b list celeb bride returning to work with her friends,in her home town,with the A LISTERS AND HIPSTERS,networking etc,everytime she leaves the house to mingle or he leaves to return to uk etc,his mind is going to be blowing thinking what she might,will be doing
he,ll only be the next man in a long list she,s used and binned on her way up

https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/468585536222755318/

Charlie is p1ssed all the money he has spent on them,join the bleedin club boy times 4 trillion.

Oh dear, seems they're not welcome in Canada

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/royal-family/canadian-newspaper-the-globe-and-mail-slams-prince-harry-and-meghan-markles-living-plans-in-furious-editorial/ar-BBZ0J8Y
.

Don't we still own them, the Canadians?

Commonwealth rather then Empire I believe

^ than

Ann Widders knew...Feb 2018.

https://youtu.be/si1DzAjeJFs?t=112

Harry and Meghan drop royal duties and HRH titles


The couple will also no longer formally represent The Queen.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex intend to repay £2.4m of taxpayer money for the refurbishment of Frogmore Cottage, which will remain their UK family home, the statement added. 

still duke and duchess of sussex  - I am from sussex - I resent these titles.

Security bill 7.6 million - who's paying

One is not amused .....

Now Known by the police s
Harry and Meghan

Like Bob and CAROL!!!

Brilliant from the Queen. She's basically told them to 'fork orf'.

She has done a great job injera.

Next time their maybe a tunnel.

Good riddance.
Their 'brand' has bombed (didn't know they had one) and their mugs, plates and towels now up to 70% off.
Wonder if DrC bought any?

The new coin
[   This image is no longer available.   ]

Hopefully betfair will put up a market on what year harry returns to the uk, wont need a big spread on the years imo.

Charlie still patrolling them?

What’s a commercial rent on Frogmore?  £0.5m a year?

Mind you, if they have already got £10m - so who needs to work anyway?

Harry is a spineless lapdog, a marriage/partnership is a two way thing and requires compromises on both sides. That doesn't seem to be the case with Meghan. She says jump and he says how high? Quite frankly the pair of them are are a complete and utter embarrassment and good riddance.

patrolling = payrolling.

megan yak

when harry gets his eyesight better i think he will want a divorce

Thought this was quite interesting on the press's treatment and what may be behind it.

To understand the “real” story of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, it helps to think in three dimensions. On one level, we have a story about a couple who, for perfectly understandable reasons, want a different kind of life: a new start, a fresh role, less scrutiny, more peace of mind. All eminently reasonable and not very remarkable.

But there is, of course, the second level: they’re inescapably royal. This is hardly the abdication: the constitutional ramifications of the sixth in line bailing out to a new life in Canada are not earth-shattering. But, whether you are a pope or a prince, there are undoubtedly complications in trying to assert a private identity that is decoupled from your apparent destiny or birthright.

The third level is the storytellers. Almost everything we think we know about this couple is filtered through journalists. It is unusually difficult to judge the reliability of most royal reporting because it is a world almost devoid of open or named sources. So, in order to believe what we’re being told, we have to take it on trust that there are currently legions of “aides”, “palace insiders”, “friends” and “senior courtiers” constantly WhatsApping their favourite reporters with the latest gossip. It has been known to happen. Maybe they are, maybe they aren’t. We just don’t know.

But trust in this third dimension is further compromised by the fact that none of the major players filtering this story for our consumption is exactly a disinterested bystander. All three of the major newspaper groups most obsessed with Harry and Meghan are themselves being sued by the couple for assorted breaches of privacy and copyright. There is, to any reasonable eyes, a glaring conflict of interest that, for the most part, goes undeclared.

For some years now – largely unreported – two chancery court judges have been dealing with literally hundreds of cases of phone hacking against MGN Ltd and News Group, the owners, respectively, of the Daily Mirror and the Sun (as well as the defunct News of the World).

The two publishers are, between them, forking out eye-watering sums to avoid any cases going to trial in open court. Because the newspaper industry lobbied so forcefully to scrap the second part of the Leveson inquiry, which had been due to shine a light on such matters, we can only surmise what is going on.

But there are clues. Mirror Group (now Reach) had by July 2018 set aside more than £70m to settle phone-hacking claims without risking any of them getting to court. The BBC reported last year that the Murdoch titles had paid out an astonishing £400m in damages and calculated that the total bill for the two companies could eventually reach £1bn.

Last October, Prince Harry added his own name to the list of people claiming they had been hacked by both the Sun and the Mirror.

To understand why this is, to put it mildly, a bombshell, you would have needed to be following the patient work of Mr Justice Mann (and before him, Mr Justice Vos) in the anonymous Rolls Building, home to the chancery court, just off London’s Strand.

Publicly available court documents detail the alleged involvement of Rupert Murdoch’s son James and the reinstated CEO of News UK, Rebekah Brooks, in suppressing or concealing the true extent of wrongdoing within the Murdoch titles. The Sun’s official position is to “not admit” any unlawful activity, while simultaneously shelling out enormous sums so that this position can never be tested.

Over at the Mirror Group, there is a similar shyness about allowing daylight into the activities of past executives. Former Daily Mirror editor Piers Morgan, one of the most vehement critics of the royal couple, does not find time or space to let his readers or viewers know that his name crops up very many times in the generic phone-hacking litigation particulars of claims in front of Mann. Morgan may be entirely innocent, but if you spend your time pouring venom over a claimant in a case that might touch on your own conduct, you’d think there was at least an interest to declare – every single time you do it.

And then there is the further legal action by Meghan against Associated Newspapers claiming assorted breaches of copyright, privacy and data protection. The Mail on Sunday claims “huge and legitimate public interest” in publishing extracts from a private letter from Meghan to her father. We shall see, but meanwhile there’s no harm in portraying her as a ruthless hypocrite and gold-digger. If Morgan’s on hand with the vitriol, everyone’s happy.

So, when reading about Harry and Meghan, it really does pay to keep your wits about you. There is a surface level to the story – not all of it untrue – and there are many anonymous sources of varying degrees of reliability to give colour and context. And, in the background, there are quite a lot of worried newspaper executives and former editors, who have absolutely zero interest in treating the couple kindly or even-handedly.

The metrics are irresistible: this couple sell newspapers and attract eyeballs by the billion. There is little hope that editors are going to dial down their coverage. But there is kindness; and there is fairness; and there is honesty. A little bit of each of those would help the rest of us understand better and trust more.

slippy -you nailed it the guys a wimp

someone who has courted media attention from day one now trying to sue people for giving her that

court cases get even more attention and an attempt to garner sympathy

on the other hand you have that nice katy price or is it katy princess  such a nice girl in comparison -well bred and knowing her place and duty unlike the america upstart

she was visiting some friends at a clinic or something for the disadvantaged(poor) and expressing common feeling and circumstances about how lonely she felt

talk about faux empathy  - rich privileged visiting the deprived   ho ho ho   what a bunch they are

there couldn't be a bigger gap between her and those women

Get the sick bucket ready for this one ..........


Ellen DeGeneres appears to confirm she WILL hold first sit-down interview with Meghan Markle since she and Prince Harry quit the Royal family
Asked if she was excited to interview Meghan, Ellen replied: 'Sure, I'm excited'
It seems to confirm rumours that Meghan will have a tell-all interview with Ellen
Meghan Markle told her close friends she is planning on giving Ellen DeGeneres her first interview, insiders exclusively told DailyMail.com
They said: '[Meghan] said Ellen understands her pain and suffering. That she epitomizes authenticity. [Meghan] feels like they are kindred spirits'

This farce is turning into Jeremy Kyle. People going on tv to have a pop at their own family.

Embarrassing but predictable scenes. The more dirt Meghan dishes the more noughts on the cheque.

this meghan bint really is a cunning sort

Amazing how many people on here know Meghan and her motives so well. So much hatred directed in her direction without a shadow of evidence (and don't start quoting newspapers, they're the worst thing about this country)

Her motives and actions are hardly opaque...

Saw a programme about Thomas Markle on C5.

Had got the impression from the media that he was a bit of an idiot, but he came
across a lot better than that.  Still some discrepancies between his version of events
and hers and a few unasked questions,  but he took loads of pictures and videos when he looked after her which
seemed as if they genuinely got on well.