Jan 10, 2020 -- 12:18AM, casemoney wrote:
Question for all forum Members A crowd of Lunatics are firing Missiles , are you getting on a departing plane at the Local Airport Add Trumps Mob may have been firing a few Back Beggars belief the plane was allowed to take off ....
You would if you thought the city was going to be nuked.
Jan 10, 2020 -- 12:26AM, moisok wrote:
who would have shot down 60 canadians - what are 60 canadians doing on that flight
I already told you it was a flight to Canada via Ukraine. 138 of them had connecting flights to Canada, 60 of them with canadian passports.
Jan 10, 2020 -- 12:06PM, detraveller wrote:
Everybody calm down. It was an accident.
chovuv, Portsmouth, United Kingdom, 9 hours ago
"A mistake made by Anti aircraft crews awaiting response from missile strike in Iraq". How does an aircraft coming from Tehran airport, climbing, tracking out of Iran, showing IFF and talking to ATC denote a response strike coming from outside the country. Sorry that's no mistake!
Jan 10, 2020 -- 1:13PM, GRANTCKING wrote:
cant believe anything Iran says after they claimed the plane came down due to techincal reasons, did they really think this would work in 2020
Not Iran's provlem that you don't believe them.
Jan 10, 2020 -- 2:14PM, 1st time poster wrote:
the missile was sent off intentionally and on purpose surely its irrelevant what it hits after that,its the firing of the missile that's the act of war,crime etc not what its aimed at or hitsone of the 20 missiles sent of 2 hrs earlier landed 30 miles from it was supposed to land if it had killed people it would still have been an act of war intentionally or unintentionally,probably a very good example of how the 1st nuclear weapon will be launched panic,middle of the night, half wit on the controls etc,etc
I agree with you, they intended to bring down an aircraft, of that there is no doubt
Jan 10, 2020 -- 2:38PM, GRANTCKING wrote:
im not entirely following what you're saying det
With today's technology, when a missile kills someone, it was intended for him. And when it misses someone, it was intended to miss.
Now Iran says plane had a technical issue.
We say it was shot down.
Either way, it doesn't matter. Iran has urged everyone to get involved, including boeing. They can get involved and prove whatever they want to prove. Come up with evidence, or believe Iran's version. What's so hard about that?
Jan 10, 2020 -- 3:34PM, detraveller wrote:
How much more can Iran offer? Do you want them to say yeah we shot it down?
Iran has bulldozed the crash site where a passenger jet came down two days ago, sparking fears of a cover-up after Tehran today denied the West's 'big lie' that Iranian missiles shot down the plane.
The debris of the Boeing 737 has been removed from the crash site near Tehran before Ukrainian investigators have even arrived - leaving the site at the mercy of scavengers.
Iran says it is 'opening' the plane's black boxes today but has indicated it will not allow the US government to analyse their contents.
Washington and its allies believe that the plane was shot down by two Iranian surface-to-air missiles which were launched and detected by satellites just minutes after the airliner took off.
why on earth have they cleared the site and not allowing the USA access to the black boxes if was a technical fault with the plane, det?
Jan 10, 2020 -- 4:48PM, SontaranStratagem wrote:
I wouldn't be seeking an apology, I'd be going full on Liam Neeson in Taken on their facking a*ses Its high time people grew a spine and went after these little cants
I couldnt agree more, imo ukraine and canada with the help of USA should hit iran with everything they have]
, commercial plane blown out the sky? nothing, 2 military bases attacked? nothing, but oh they were going to attack one of our embassy's
.... like what? so they killed on a general on nothing more than hearsay they were going to attack a building with few people in it? like they could get them out if they had "intel", but don't do s*** when it comes to them actually attacking a plane full of innocents and actually attacking 2 military bases? because they were "by accident"

Jan 11, 2020 -- 10:25AM, terry mccann wrote:
Got to feel sorry for the Russians,blamed for everything without a shread of evidence everytime-think Salisbury for a kick off
the forum's thickest poster never fails to deliver.
Jan 11, 2020 -- 11:02AM, detraveller wrote:
?
Speaking of"?", have you yet worked out how Deutsche Bahn being state owned might be related to them being able to offer cheap travel tickets?


Jan 11, 2020 -- 10:40AM, 1st time poster wrote:
of course if they thought under orders they were shooting down a usa missile,drone etc as ive already said its not unintentional ,its collateral damage of an act of war,but Canada,uk,germany,sweden seem fine with it,but talk of war because someone demonstrates outside an embassy ,the west have made a laughing stock of themselves, iran can shootdown 180 civilians without reprisal,s , of course if 1,2,3 70 americans were on board trump would be force to attack iran
Hearsay is an act of war
Actually blowing up commercial flights is nothing, none of them could give a s***
Hence the pathetic "response" and half ar*ed effort to sweep it under the rug
Absolute jokers running the asylum and people let them ffs
Jan 11, 2020 -- 8:25AM, Ibrahima Sonko wrote:
All the stupid people who thought Iran did not take out the airliner, go join corbyn in the stupid corner.
true
Jan 11, 2020 -- 11:05AM, detraveller wrote:
I think you will find I was right when I said the show was over looking at how the US didn't bother responding to the dozen rockets fired at their bases.
you did get it badly wrong when you believed the iran story, ive still no idea how they thought that would work in 2020
the IQ levels in Iran must be amongst the lowest in the world
Jan 11, 2020 -- 2:30PM, GRANTCKING wrote:
Jan 11, 2020 -- 11:05AM, detraveller wrote:I think you will find I was right when I said the show was over looking at how the US didn't bother responding to the dozen rockets fired at their bases.you did get it badly wrong when you believed the iran story, ive still no idea how they thought that would work in 2020 the IQ levels in Iran must be amongst the lowest in the world
I believed Iran's version because it has been a non event. Irrelevant. Either way no one is invading Iran. Now we know Iran did it. What has changed? Nothing. When there were not going to be any consequences, believing Iran or proving they were lying made no difference.


Jan 12, 2020 -- 10:38AM, saddo wrote:
Iran claimed all the 'Canadian' victims as Iranian, it's possible the Brits were the same.
I had thought BBC would have covered the victims a bit more if they were 'diverse' brits. I noticed their coverage of the canadian victims mentioned how canada was in mourning, showing a shot of some iranians reading the koran sitting in a room.