It took the Lib Dem leader one second to deliberate,consider and assess the most colossal question of all and it removed any lingering doubts that she is simply unfit to be an elected M.P. let alone P.M. of the UK. Would you "be prepared to use a nuclear weapon" she was asked during a one to one interview and instantaneously without any context,consideration or hesitation a nonchalant "YES" was the answer,so relaxed it sounded like a laid back "yeah".
Would you be prepared to incinerate millions of innocent men .women and children,destroy half the planet? Swinton displayed for the whole world to see a fundamental immaturity to handle such an important and serious question. Johnson and Corbin are useless enough without adding this nutjob into the mix.
Would you be prepared to incinerate millions of innocent men .women and children,destroy half the planet?Swinton displayed for the whole world to see a fundamental immaturity to handle such an important and serious question. Johnson and Corbin are us
The new trident upgrade which will cost about 100 biliion has 4 new submarines with 160 new warheads with 40 on each submarine , just 1 of these missiles has 8 times the capability of the one drop on Hiroshima in WW2 , value you for money eh ?
The new trident upgrade which will cost about 100 biliion has 4 new submarines with 160 new warheads with 40 on each submarine , just 1 of these missiles has 8 times the capability of the one drop on Hiroshima in WW2 , value you for money eh ?
Hopefully the good people of her constituency will have noticed the offending interview where it took her one second to decide to kill millions but 25 seconds to discuss air mile policy and try to explain her personal hypocrisy in relation to use of more polluting flights to travel from LONDON TO HER SCOTTISH CONSTITUENCY than environmentally more friendly train travel.
Hopefully the good people of her constituency will have noticed the offending interview where it took her one second to decide to kill millions but 25 seconds to discuss air mile policy and try to explain her personal hypocrisy in relation to use of
I heard Michael Portillo state that he was against renewing our nuclear weapons because we don't control their use anyway.
He said we can't use them independently of America, so why pay for something we're not getting?
Which makes sense, for why would America give us the option of striking them with their own weapons of mass destruction?
I agree with J.W.H. I heard Michael Portillo state that he was against renewing our nuclear weapons because we don't control their use anyway. He said we can't use them independently of America, so why pay for something we're not getting?Which makes
Academic question. The closest Jo will get to a nuclear weapon is on a visit to the IWM. May as well enquire about her plans to defend against a zombie attack.
Academic question. The closest Jo will get to a nuclear weapon is on a visit to the IWM. May as well enquire about her plans to defend against a zombie attack.