|
By:
British justice system these days sounds like a perfect example of lunatics running the asylum.
|
|
By:
surely if it had gone to crown court in front of jury there is no way he would have been found guilty , would he?
|
|
By:
memo to oneself - "how to make a friend" on Google
|
|
By:
coviction rate in the Magistrates’ Court is significantly higher than in the Crown Court.
There are a number of views about why this is and care has to be taken over statistics in this area because published conviction rates often include those who plead guilty as well as those who are found guilty after trial. However, many criminal lawyers agree that juries are more likely to give defendants the benefit of the doubt. Many people do not get the opportunity to do jury service, but those that do usually take the whole process very seriously; it is their chance to take part in a crucial civic role; most do only two weeks of jury service and approach the task of judging a fellow human being in a conscientious and fair-minded way. The brief tenure of a jury can be contrasted with that of District Judges who work full time in the Magistrates’ Court, or of Magistrates who, although working only part-time, will often have judged cases regularly over many years. Some lawyers take the view that over time some District Judges and Magistrates can become case-hardened and cynical in their approach and are therefore less likely than jurors to give a defendant the benefit of the doubt. Of course, many Judges and Magistrates are equally open-minded, but the statistics bear out that, at trial, juries are more likely to find defendants Not Guilty. |
|
By:
If you want to appeal from the Magistrates’ Court against conviction (i.e. being found guilty)
or sentence (where you consider your punishment is too harsh) you have the right to do so and the procedure is relatively straightforward. By contrast, appealing against conviction or sentence from the Crown Court is a far more complex process. You do not have an automatic right to appeal but have to apply for ‘leave’ (i.e. permission) from a senior judge before the Court of Appeal will hear your case. In short, the appeals process from the Crown Court is far more involved than from the Magistrates' Court. |
|
By:
but what the hell was any judge even in magistrate doing finding him guilty in this case, beggars belief,
|
|
By:
i think they should both go on Love Island
|
|
By:
That's what I was thinking elis. Hence the comment about lunatics running the asylum.
I also can't see how a lawyer could have won a case like this representing the girl. And how bad the boy's lawyer would have been to have not been able to get him off. But together they have completed the job and made each one of them successfully look like an idiot. |
|
By:
dunno ellisjohn, itt is , ...at face value , a very odd decision.imo
you would perhaps need to have sat through the case and heard all of the evidence, but even so it seems odd to reach the conclusion the magistrate did here. |
|
By:
I can understand why the girl might have been disturbed by the incident, but the idea it's considered a sexual assault is, frankly, ridiculous.
|
|
By:
I think not Denzil
Our justice system is ridiculously biased toward women now One accepts they women not always believed in the past sadly ![]() But that does not mean we believe just about everything that comes out of their mouths now.. We need to get back to justice...and take a more neutral position. Which seems difficult for us?????????? |
|
By:
UBLE, You won't have this problem with Sharia law around. Think positive.
Or maybe the justice system is setting you up so that you welcome Sharia whenever its implemented? |
|
By:
Was meaning at the start like the first interactions but agree with your post REGY.
|
|
By:
I think Denzil means that she wouldn't have made a complaint.
|
|
By:
Yes iawn
|
|
By:
It's fair to say that not being physically attractive is one of the biggest negatives a person has to overcome nowadays and the advantages that physically attractive people have in today's world are unmeasurable imo.
|
|
By:
They won't be able to build the jails fast enough now to house all the boys and men guilty of touching a girl's arm, however innocently. Think of all the business from Historic "Sex Crimes" of this type alone.
We are ALL going to jail, so let's hope there is a good Wi-Fi set up in each, along with full access to Betfair. You've never had it so Progressive. |
|
By:
It's been known for as long as you like that you'll be lucky to find justice in a Magistrates’ Court.
The golden rule is to avoid going to court in the first place. If you have to go then always get a solicitor. That counts for a lot with beaks, because they're usually as thick as two short planks. |
|
By:
i_agree_with_nick 10 Oct 19 15:11 Joined: 21 May 10 | Topic/replies: 10,998 | Blogger: i_agree_with_nick's blog I think Denzil means that she wouldn't have made a complaint. I see nick apologies Well people do touch each other on the arm intentionally or accidentally If we regard that as a sexual assault Difficult to see how people are ever going to mate in the future |
|
By:
if you do it by accident its not an assault...
then it has to be unwanted.... then it has to be sexual still struggling to see how touching arm or side is sexual, but might be more to it, ...or he appeals and magistrate is overturned |
|
By:
I agree there...you-have-to-laugh
You could regard it as harassment, he did want the girl's attention.. but sexual?????...jumping the gun a bit there I also hope he appeals and it is overturned |
|
By:
i personally pat a lot of people on the arm as a nice to see you gesture if i know them
![]() |
|
By:
|
|
By:
it won't be long before there is a conviction for sexual assault when a guy looks at a girl with a twinkle in his eye
|
|
By:
i can see it now - "I knew he wanted to bang me up against the wall"
|
|
By:
some women i know give me a cuddle, when meeting up , some dont,
quite a feat of memory to recall who does and who does not... some male friends shake hands with me on meeting up, others do not, some females now shake hands too, but not the ones that give a cuddle. in france when i was younger i could never work out which ones i was supposed to put arm around and kiss on saying hello, ....just be english and smile a lot .! |
|
By:
i think "smiling" would fall into the twinkle category
|
|
By:
Looking at someone in the "wrong way" in the workplace has for many years constituted sexual harassment.
How many men have been sexually assaulted by women in the workplace? I have. Sometimes it was awkward and at the worst slightly uncomfortable and occasionally it was very welcome! |
|
By:
when i was in school in the 70s, a gang of us boys and girls would go to the garage lock ups in the town every dinner time, for if i may be crude and say it as it was( a snog and a feel ) we were 12/13.
|
|
By:
i hope not bap, i would be stuffed...
![]() |
|
By:
ps i still see my usual partner then in town on occassions, shes over 60 now and still
![]() ![]() |
|
By:
i've said it a few times on here Mr O; so here it is again - i am scared of smiling at a female i don't know (& some i do)
|
|
By:
Getting quite ridiculous
If she wasn't interested just tell him duck, if he touches you on the arm them brush him off ffs |
|
By:
She told court his contact had hindered her application to Oxford University
What does this mean? That the experience traumatized her to an extend that it affected her chances of getting expected? |
|
By:
extent
|
|
By:
id say its probably her" me too" mum that has made her complain, these 25/50age women age group are the worst id say in their pc world .
|
|
By:
Yes, SS. Technically, he may have broken the law but maybe the law needs to be amended.
Clearly, certain acts should always be outlawed but touching a hand or shoulder etc should not, imo, constitute sexual assault as long as the person doesn't persist after the woman makes it clear the contact is unwanted. |
|
By:
Of course he could have then got aggressive and that's a totally different matter
As a man if she's not interested then I don't wanna know either to be honest, she has to be accepting and into you for it to be something good anyway in my opinion Its all about chemistry |
|
By:
I have always wondered why there aren't more cases of secual harassment every day. All the woman has to do is accuse someone without any burden of proof. I don't even know how anyone can prove something like he touched my breasts or tried to get his hands into my pants or similar stuff. It is a big weapon women have but you don't see them using it. A kid runs out of a principal's office with her pants off and the principal will be in jail. Never happens. Probably no student crazy enough to pull it off?
|