If ever a prorogation was correctly used it was by Boris .The fact of the matter is we don’t have a constitution makes the term “stymying parliament “ a complete and utter farce in the context of what has transpired since 17.4 MILLION of the electorate gave the EU the red card in a once in s lifetime “no going back legal and lawful referendum . Also the subsequent general election further gave weight to that result.The wishes of the people have been denied ,first by parliament and now by the Law Lords (on some 300 year old case ) although the full judgement will be known tommorrow . The process since the ref vote has been an utter shambles and a disgrace to democracy, these charlatans have the obsolete gall to call themselves parliamentarians .Total scum and need treated as such ,traitors and treacherous cowards . If the question of what was meant by leaving the EU was genuine (the remainiacs term soft/hard Brexit ) was truthfull why not have a further poll of the 17.4 Milion that voted leave ? The total viper pit that is the opposition benches have lost their senses ,their morals and the little credit they had .Scum .
If ever a prorogation was correctly used it was by Boris .The fact of the matter is we don’t have a constitution makes the term “stymying parliament “ a complete and utter farce in the context of what has transpired since 17.4 MILLION of the el
YES . do they think the 17.4 million are just going to forget about it............
The above needs to be taken to the High Court , DID 17.4 Million people vote to leave the EU A simple question
YES or NO ,there is only one answer No Ifs or Buts ..
“no going back legal and lawful referendum . YES . do they think the 17.4 million are just going to forget about it............ The above needs to be taken to the High Court , DID 17.4 Million people vote to leave the EU A simple question YES or