
prioritise negativity and hatred over seeking value.
) who hate women more than they hate themselves are moaning about the standard, as if they're forced to watch it, they missed a ****tonne of +EV wagering opportunities.
Sep 15, 2019 -- 6:58AM, Richie_Burnett wrote:
Sexist thread. Quelle surprise, jucel69 gettijng stuck inWhen they first started televising women's cricket, the books and the exchange made so many ricks it was almost unbelievable. Side markets odds were insane in a lot of cases. It's obviously a lot more accurate now, but the sad act MAWG's and middle englanders prioritise negativity and hatred over seeking value.While the sad fascists (too many to name) who hate women more than they hate themselves are moaning about the standard, as if they're forced to watch it, they missed a ****tonne of +EV wagering opportunities.
What is sexist about saying something is unwatchable dross?
,
Sep 15, 2019 -- 8:50AM, detraveller wrote:
When I was a kid I used to wonder why the Australians played cricket starting midnight and then throughout the night. I had many theories but I settled on them doing it so they could avoid the English watching them play. For whatever reasons.Then I discovered timezones.
Did you also spend time pondering how they managed to play cricket whilst standing upside down

, apologies to our women posters Sep 15, 2019 -- 10:12AM, Angoose wrote:
Sep 15, 2019 -- 8:50AM, detraveller wrote:When I was a kid I used to wonder why the Australians played cricket starting midnight and then throughout the night. I had many theories but I settled on them doing it so they could avoid the English watching them play. For whatever reasons.Then I discovered timezones.Did you also spend time pondering how they managed to play cricket whilst standing upside down
No at that age i thought countries Were stacked on top of each other. So aus was somewhere above the clouds.

Sep 15, 2019 -- 3:02PM, flushgordon1 wrote:
Is Richie Owen Jones?
Think Owen is less diverse and throws fewer hissy fits than Ritchie but if he keeps working at it will make it to Ritchies level one day,fingers crossed mush.
might as well really let my grumpy old man steam off while I'm on one. Subjective sports at the Olympics (basically ANYTHING that's judged) diving, gymnastics, dressage, boxing, ice dancing, synchronised swimming - give me strength!!!
Sep 15, 2019 -- 7:47PM, Injera wrote:
Grand Slam tennis is equal pay despite 3 sets versus 5. Condescending to women but no outcry.In track and field I've yet to hear an outcry that decathletes perform in 10 disciplines as opposed to the heptathletes' 7. Men just get on with it.Women play from closer tees in club, never mind pro golf. Shorter boundaries and smaller ball in cricket.No outcry. Why? Thought they wanted ekwality?
I think the tennis thing is wrong but not absolutely sure of myself.
Track and field men get paid more.
Golf men get paid more.
Cricket men get paid more.
Sep 15, 2019 -- 7:52PM, leazes67 wrote:
Womens tennis get paid the same as men.
Prize money (not pay) is equal in four tournaments a year.
Why does that bother you so much?



Sep 15, 2019 -- 4:47PM, Coachbuster wrote:
'they deserve mens pay' but the blokes don't deserve their pay either ... the money it generates see they get 100x more than they're worth. Is a EPL footballer worth more than 50 plumbers or electricians ? ergo if women's football generates huge interest in the future and becomes more popular than men's ,then they should get more pay then men
It really doesn't work like that in their little worlds though
They get to use all the mens training facilities, grounds, even have former legends of the mens game (who get forced to say) say how great womens sport is, even though its absolutely facking awful quality , and should anyone bring this up they are immediately attacked as "sexist pigs", you ain't allowed to question them
They piggy bag as pointed by the OP, on the mens game, get to use everything the men have built, and then scream they want the same pay as the men who generate all the money
The joke is on us by the way
.
Sep 15, 2019 -- 8:36PM, terry mccann wrote:
They are trying to tell people that there is no biological difference between men and woman
Stick the men against the women in anything like Cricket, Football etc and they'd see for themselves
Except this wont happen they'll just carry shouting from afar, and should anyone call them out they are sacked or shot down as "sexists"
There's no debate to be had because they don't want to debate they just want to control

Sep 16, 2019 -- 8:57AM, terry mccann wrote:
Transgender,ok its been around a long time but hidden away but now its even taught in schools,thats what I mean,its come from nowhere,confusing little children is so cool
honestly m8 stay from that madness. it makes brexit look like a coffee morning chat.
the most toxic debate bar none.
Sep 15, 2019 -- 8:47PM, SontaranStratagem wrote:
Sep 15, 2019 -- 4:47PM, Coachbuster wrote:'they deserve mens pay' but the blokes don't deserve their pay either ... the money it generates see they get 100x more than they're worth. Is a EPL footballer worth more than 50 plumbers or electricians ? ergo if women's football generates huge interest in the future and becomes more popular than men's ,then they should get more pay then menIt really doesn't work like that in their little worlds though They get to use all the mens training facilities, grounds, even have former legends of the mens game (who get forced to say) say how great womens sport is, even though its absolutely facking awful quality , and should anyone bring this up they are immediately attacked as "sexist pigs", you ain't allowed to question them They piggy bag as pointed by the OP, on the mens game, get to use everything the men have built, and then scream they want the same pay as the men who generate all the money The joke is on us by the way
W/Footie mainly promoted by the BBC who no longer have the rights to the men's game so they will be the first to say how exciting it is etc .
Still ,i don't lose any sleep over any of the issues behind pay etc as none of them ,women or men deserve what they get ...it's crazy .
I can't listen to famle commentary on the men's game though - it's just horrible on the ear ...
.
Sep 16, 2019 -- 6:24PM, elisjohn wrote:
yesterday on tms , i always put up a bet on here on order, and i can always cancell it if a wkt has gone if im quick, they say radio is faster than tv, anyway twice yesterday when that isha was commentating it cost me plenty, she was waffling about this that the other with tufnell everything bar what was going on in the middle, and then said "oh theres a wicket", too late for me bet taken .
The roar of the crowd in the background may have been a clue although I suspect that the commentary may reveal a somewhat different tale
Sep 16, 2019 -- 6:27PM, Dr Crippen wrote:
As this is a betting site if you had any sense you'd be reading everything there is to know about these women as there's more chance you'll get odds which are clearly incorrect.Here we go again. Another skint punter who knows so much he's willing to share it with everybody.If you knew anything worth knowing (which you don't,) you'd keep it to yourself anyway.
Drippin 






