The final straw for me when it comes to the mainstream media

European women have ridiculously low birth rates (Italy, a catholic country supposdely against contraception), is only 1.35!!!!!, Germany isn't that much better), while immigrants to Europe have high birthrates, often very high.  Anyone with even the most basic common sense and ability to count on one hand can see what the outcome of this will be down the line. This is a fantastic thing according to the BBC/Left, and the BBC will try to encourage this as much as possible.

If you bothered to open BBC today chances are you will never stop reading them, no matter the standard of the crap they feed you. There are many that blame BBC everyday yet their next thread is about another news item BBC fed them.

Pressure to have children can come from all kinds of places.

A parent who's impatient for grandkids. Friends who've recently had children themselves. Potential partners who ask on first dates what your plans are for the future.


How is that pressure?  If you want kids it's a good idea to find out early whether a potential mate does or not.  Why waste time?

Got to agree with the above. Wondering if your prospective partner wants or doesn't want kids is about as basic as it gets as a life expectation, in many ways it's the entire POINT of a man and woman pairing up. it's just pathetic snowflakery to think this is a bad thing or "pressure". WTF is the point in a man who wants kids going 10 dates with a woman before finding out she doesn't? So she gets a load of meals bought for her and he's wasted weeks of his life, how feminist would that be.

some people are thinking of not having kids because of climate change.

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/06/05/health/birthstrike-climate-change-scn-intl/index.html

WTF is the point in a man who wants kids going 10 dates with a woman before finding out she doesn't?

Practise?

BBC news today had the usual double attack of Brexit doom mongery and Climate Change doom mongery.
Hard to remember a day they DIDN'T tbh. Still time for them to round it off the hat trick with an evening story from Will Gomperz about something to do with Diversity in showbiz.

i still await any of the  TV Channels having a Brexit biased guest list. Now just why is that? Every day it is the complete opposite

BBC news today had the usual double attack of Brexit doom mongery and Climate Change doom mongery.

Yet some on the Politics forum maintain BBC are pro Brexit and pro Trump

"Yet some on the Politics forum maintain BBC are pro Brexit and pro Trump"
I steer clear of that forum but anyone saying that is a troll or mental.

Or/and incredibly biased themselves strange what political leanings can do to a person's sense of balance.

anyone who says that about the BBC are deluded or don't watch it. Even the anchors are programmed

Was tempted to start a "Days since the BBC didn't have a Brexit Doom Story" thread but it'll be nailed on 100 consecutive days of "0" until Halloween so hardly worth the effort.

as i said above though; it's all the TV stations. At least America counteracts CNN with Fox News

Jul 31, 2019 -- 2:09PM, Baphornet wrote:

anyone who says that about the BBC are deluded or don't watch it. Even the anchors are programmed

Yes you can tell the difference between actual news and scripted reporting.

A "days since the BBC had a POSITIVE Brexit story" might be an interesting thread as they are as rare as sparrows carrying away chihuahuas.
That could add up to an internet breakingly high number.

But of course they aren't "anti Brexit", oh no ...

would you like the pleasure JC? If not i will put one up

I haven't seen them do a positive story on the slave trade in a fair while.

Jul 31, 2019 -- 1:29PM, lybertyne wrote:

Pressure to have children can come from all kinds of places.A parent who's impatient for grandkids. Friends who've recently had children themselves. Potential partners who ask on first dates what your plans are for the future. How is that pressure?  If you want kids it's a good idea to find out early whether a potential mate does or not.  Why waste time?

Exactly

As for the comment above from detraveller I do not push anything from the media in a positive light

They are basically pressuring women NOT to have kids ffs, whilst hiding it with blaming "social pressure"

Women can make their own minds up surely? and most women round my end who have had kids recently have done so because they got "broody", it was the men who were sort of pushed into it by the women. I don't think the media live in the real world ffs.

A woman I know who was very much on the left side of politics, said she was never having kids



Popped one out a few weeks ago and was trying for the sprog as well

I think she finally got out of that indoctrination bless her

Too right, it always will be the best way to get to the top of the housing lists.

Edit:
A "days since the BBC had a POSITIVE Trump story" might be an interesting thread as they are as rare as gold sparrows who can speak klingon carrying away blue whales.
That could add up to an internet breakingly high number.

But of course they are "Pro Trump"....

Trump is well capable of blowing his own. All they have to do is show his tweets and then us non twitter users still get to see positive Trump.

Well you don't want a negative Trump, it'll suck your Ys right up.

Precisely why he never went commando.

I might of got that one wrong.

I suppose you would go commando if you considered Y suction a very serious danger.

Au contraire, he WAS a commando, just has to keep it secret due to the missions he did. THose stories about draft dodging are a cover story. He was a very very good awesome commando, the best commando there ever was, it was awesome, how best he was. True. So True. His words. He told me himself.

But on that point, when the US company is booming the BBC hate covering it. Same as when pound goes up they don't like to cover it, when it drops they like to cover it, as evidenced again this week in spades. When FTSE goes up they hate covering it, when it drops they love covering it.

If he tweeted his cover to the twittersphere he'd have to kill the twittersphere.

The rag Guardian newspaper published a story saying that declining birth rates of human babies was a "cause for celebration". Btw sperm counts are down due to EMF radiation worldwide.

Constant pushing of contraception as well, the one's with the nightclubs are cringe worthy

"yes go out and s**g as much as you want and never get pregnant"

Because people think sex is going quench all negative emotion ffs

It might do you some good.

Jul 31, 2019 -- 3:09PM, mouse muldoon wrote:

I haven't seen them do a positive story on the slave trade in a fair while.

Every International Athletics meeting is a positive endorsement (also reported on) depends how you choose to view the reality of human physiology.

Actually in a very high level ojective view there were surely positive aspects of the slave trade. Without it it's extremely unlikely there would have been the influx of black people to the US and caribbean put in that situation with western instruments, culture, religion and hardship mixing it all up.
And without that I think it's extremely unlikely we'd have had Blues, Jazz, Funk, even Reggae and therefore all the things that depended on that, Swing, Rock, the Beatles, Heavy Metal etc. Indeed music would probably be totally sh1t without it, we'd all be listening to how much is that doggy in the bloody window. We probably wouldn't even have had George Formby.

I'm speaking a whole load of sense of course but if someone publically said that you'd be lynched by the SJWs who don't like facts or objective thought.... You could imagine the Guardian Peace. "JC points out Slavery lead to good music. He's a nazi apologist that must be killed."

Guardian PIECE. Such is my anger at the journal of morons they made me spell badly. Which makes me even more angry. It's a vicious circle.

Yep shocking

another thread where JC shows a shocking lack of self awareness and acts just as hysterical as any annoying SJW, what's new

But if we'd just exported guitars and amplification to them wouldn't they all have ended up sounding exactly like Tinariwen?

I think Denzil has confused endorsement with by product.

aaronh • July 31, 2019 9:14 PM BST
another thread where JC shows a shocking lack of self awareness and acts just as hysterical as any annoying SJW, what's new
--
Ok I'll bite, rarely given the poster. In what way, given you are exactly the sort of snowflake who is incapable of understanding any rational point and jumps straight to being "offended", trolling (your primary past time on here) and sanctimonious point scoring. Please elaborate.

But if we'd just exported guitars and amplification to them wouldn't they all have ended up sounding exactly like Tinariwen?
--
Would we even have electric guitars, as now, and amplication? Serious point. Why would you need Marshalls and Gibson Les Pauls to play "How much is that doggy in the window".

It's simply a fact that "bad things" can sometimes have extra results that are good. Without WW2 for example, horrendous as it was, many techinoligical advances would have come much later or not at all. Computing, plane technology, radar, submarines, medicines all took a massive leap forward. Without the cold war, would the internet or it's like even be invented by now.

It's a funny old thing, necessity is the mother of invention. You know the old saying, when a butterfly flaps its wings ... it might lead to accussations by other butterflies it's causing a draught.

Link Wray would still of needed an electric to play his version of Batman.

Les Paul himself used to play some sort of electrified hillbilly music

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iGXP_UBog4

See. The world would have been like amped up Deliverance.

At least it would have saved us from Ed Sheeran though.