|
By:
In Mr Warr's case, details of his arrest were broadcast on the BBC that evening.
His diary, photos, computer and phone were confiscated and, he says, used by officers to contact "numerous" former pupils. "The police tried desperately for others to come forward. "When they went to see former pupils... it was made quite clear I was going to be prosecuted and they were looking for people strong enough to say I'd done similar things to them. "They had no intention of getting to the bottom of what happened. It certainly turns the whole edict of 'innocent until proven guilty' on its head." Improving victims' rights In the past it had been very difficult for victims of historical abuse to get any form of justice. A series of changes was brought in to improve that. From 1988, those accused lost an automatic right to anonymity. A crucial ruling in 1990 meant separate allegations no longer needed to be "strikingly similar" to be considered together at trial. In 2014, Her Majesty's Inspector of Constabulary (HMIC) issued guidance which said "the presumption that a victim should always be believed should be institutionalised". |
|
By:
Unfortunately it is a minefield
In the past real victims were never "heard" but we now have unsubstantiated claims and there are innocent victims falsely accused Because some crimes were commited such a long time ago there is no physical evidence but no doubt much abuse existed and was prevalent The suggestion from recent times has been the police ar overly zealous and we aren't necessarily correcting the wrongs of the past but creating new victims Not sure there is a perfect solution but obviously if we believe in justice then someone is innocent until proven guilty ... Its all very sad but some real victims will never receive relief from the past ... does restorative justice work or help? |
|
By:
The potential perpetrator's name should be secret until convicted....these police fishing exercises are creating all kinds of problems.
|