If the moon landings were faked...

Your point sir?

Just throwing it out for discussion.

Why wouldn't NASA have faked a mission to Mars if they faked the moon landings? A genuine question - not rhetorical.

Maybe some people think that the unmanned landings on Mars were faked.

No ,not faked true imo. Now the moon thing.why wouldn’t you go back 30 years? ..

oj simpson was on mars mission, it was on tv.

We have to go back to put a woman on there

All of em , but they  would still look down on us

"Now the moon thing.why wouldn’t you go back 30 years? .. "

Because it's ridiculously expensive and ridiculously dangerous and they didn't feel it was worth it? Is that rubbish the best the tin foilers have got today?

Thiers an old saying crisp ,if vibrators could buy a round of drinks we would be gone

With improved technology available to the general public, it would now be much tougher to pull off such a huge deception.

The moon is a disc and can't be landed on

there's no such things as "ball planets" either

Did you notice the Lunar eclipse midweek Sont?
Only partial but still pretty impressive considering there are no "ball planets "


Yep if moon landings were all fake 50 years ago, then why not fake landings on Mars, Venus, Saturn etc.

Reasonable chance humans will return to moon next decade, fully expect the evidence-free theories to emerge on you tube about them also being a fake.

Why risk people, with robotics as it is just send robots, unless we plan to colonise it.

TBF though, the cost of building a pile of huge rockets and building a lunar space colony would still be cheaper than a modest flat in London

... just been watching the moon landing / but couldnt get my head around who this Roger chap was  ?  he must have been the head honcho back at base  as they mentioned him a lot

Jul 20, 2019 -- 3:18PM, Crisp77 wrote:

We have to go back to put a woman on there

And leave her there