THE BOSTON BOMBING

Mobile phones couldn't work on flying planes back in 2001--end of chat.

I take it tm doesn't believe in airphones either. And cell phones did work on planes in 2001. Let's hope he sticks to his end of chat.

They just wont mention airphones because they are both lying about it.

its like denying the existence of internet today. A tech's been there for 20 years and these two claim it doesn't exist.

That's why they are both trying to cover it up with mobile phones.

The thing is chaz,you say they work but the lady hostess who worked for the airline in 2001 said they didn't and that it was impossible for people to phone as the official line said they did,she said the calls were fake chaz. She would know  wouldn't she!

the lady hostess who worked for the airline in 2001 said they didn't and that it was impossible for people to phone

This is a LIE

You will tell me its in a video.

I will ask you at which point in the video she says that.

You won't be able to tell me that.

Which proves you are lying.

We've been over this lie before.

Its so easy to catch you lying.

So why would see Lie? The Documentary was made a couple of years ago,this information would be known one way or another, if she was lying the film would not have been made.If she was lying then the huge amount of people who have left comments would have pointed it out, not one has, so hate to say it troll but its you that's LYING  and no wonder,because the calls were made from the ground,proberly in that hanger. The question then is,what really happened to those poor sods on the plane? She thinks they were gassed to death.

Any decent person with a decent reputation would just show me the video and tell the timestamp.

But you wont. You'll say everything else to support your lie but you won't say where you heard her saying that.

Because you're lying.

Why would anyone believe a particular woman who had nothing to do with what went on on the day and disbelieve 100's of others who were involved? And then believe the passengers were gassed. It takes a twisted mind to bevel in what she said.

F uck off man, if I give a link you can find it, if I give a link and ive got one word out of place im a liar, so look it up yourself its easy to find but you somehow wont be able to manage it. If the lady is correct WOW WHAT A THING

It takes a twisted mind to believe in what she said.

* CANT FIND IT

Jun 12, 2019 -- 12:10PM, terry mccann wrote:

F uck off man, if I give a link you can find it, if I give a link and ive got one word out of place im a liar, so look it up yourself its easy to find but you somehow wont be able to manage it. If the lady is correct WOW WHAT A THING

Notice how terry doesn't give a link.

Because he is making everything up.

I know the video and the woman you're on about tm. The question I'm asking is why you believe her and not what 100's of other people say?

Yes of course chaz unless it was true

She's Rebekah Roth who supposedly wrote a fictional account of what went on; fictional to protect herself.

You still have answered the question as to why you believe her and not 100s of others.

She would be sued to buggery chaz if she was lying, was that from wiki--o f uckin yeah

Not from Wiki but wouldn't make any difference if it was. She actually said it was a fictional account.

You still haven't answered the question I asked.

Tell me whats NOT to believe?

You are the one who believes her. Tell me what is so special about what she said.

Wiki never discredits anybody only the names I put up,strange one that, must rival the BBC that lot

terry why do you bother posting if you are never going to answer questions?

Do you believe in UFOs? Aliens?

Yes so untrustworthy they even made a documentary

Jun 12, 2019 -- 12:25PM, terry mccann wrote:

Yes so untrustworthy they even made a documentary

RIP

so if you make a documentary about something it becomes true?

Who are these hundreds btw? the whole thing is a mystery,for one the hole to plane was supposed to have made! Have you seen the size of it?, Chaz help us out here,how the f uck did they get away with it,i mean seriously

They got away with it because when people like you want to prove it was fake, they start lying and lose all credibility.

If you use a bit of common sense (may be difficult for you though) you can work out that 100s of people were involved in the official explanation. What size hole did you expect?

And that hole was made by another crash years before

Well boys,you do the same things all the time so if you don't mind im going to have to disagree with you-have a nice day y"all

all we ask of you is give sources of your claims.

You never do. Because you lie.

Have a nice day and stay clear of those 5G waves.

You are doing your utmost to avoid answering questions. Is that because you don't know? If not then why are you surprised about the size of the hole? What size would you expect?

Come on tm you've had over 24 hours to think of an answer. Perhaps you'll get this thread pulled as you have with the others. Threads can be removed but your stupidity can't.

As Charlie charms his way through another thread.

im waiting for you to watch the video and then we can debate so long as you like, its about the video and the the false flag that was the Boston Bombings,that what the fred is about and I will more than gladly have a chat with you but not unless you watch the video

You keep changing from one topic to another to avoid answering questions. What size hole did you expect the plane to make?

Ah the crash, ok, relatively small crater chaz

Let answer correctly, a wide bodied plane crashes,so where is it? A relatively small crater and next to no debris from what was presumed to be where a 100 ton jet just crashed, like the rest of 9/11 makes no sense.

But you would expect a small crater just so I understand what you said?

Nope,i will try it another way but the same answer, a 100 ton jet would have made a much bigger crater THATS what im saying

A tad confusing given your 8:15 post but now you say a much bigger crater (I take it that's what you mean). Plus you would expect to see a lot of debris (just so I'm clear what you mean)?

Just in case you come back with another smart a$$ post, that hole was way to small and maybe it was made by a much smaller crash years before,i think I heard that the locals had described a crash years before in that same spot.

It wasn't smart ass I was trying to be clear on what you meant. Why do you think there would be a big crater and lots of debris?

I can't find any mention of a previous crash at Shanksville. Do you have a source?

So W anks ville-----Hole way to small,no bodies and next to no debris-- monumental b0llocks

Pentagon, missile shown to have made hole,once again way to small for a jet to have made, FBI  straight remove CCTV, o I wonder why---pure f uckary

Twin towers,impossible to come down but come down they did,WTC7,hit bu nothing,impossible to come down,but come down it did

Conclusion, pure monumental b0llocks,the biggest false flag until they the next big one." "The new pearl harbour"

O what a surprise,crisis actors used in Orlando false flag, with no sense of direction

terry why are the elite bothering with all this, when they plan to kill us all with 5G?

tm
You're still not answering the question as to why you think there should be a bigger hole and more debris. You just keep repeating there should be a bigger hole and more debris. And do you have a source for the previous crash at Shanksville or not? If so post it.

Because they are greedy bastards dave since you asked, Chaz, I know you live in another world but you cant be a square peg in a round hole,it don't fit.

Jun 15, 2019 -- 4:58PM, Charlie wrote:

tmYou're still not answering the question as to why you think there should be a bigger hole and more debris. You just keep repeating there should be a bigger hole and more debris. And do you have a source for the previous crash at Shanksville or not? If so post it.

So I take it you don't know and there is no source.

Why do I feel like we have been there before?

Terry claiming something happened(a previous crash in Shanksville in this case)
My lie detector sounding an alarm and detecting the lie.
Terry nowhere to be seen to give a source of his claim.

Becuase as always, terry lied.

The problem is terry's lawyers will come on the thread now and call me a bully and a troll because I exposed terry's lie. But note how terry will NEVER bother to give a source, until of course he moves on to his next lie.

The 2 trade towers I do believe we're hit
There's plenty of footage to agree, the other 2 sites, I don't....No planes,wreckage or fuel age for a start

Bb

BOOM! BOOM! BOOM! That's the sound of controlled explosives that the firemen said they heard before the twin towers came down, "where the link"? well there is tons on youtube guys just look it up. Seek and you will find.

Jun 13, 2019 -- 8:32PM, terry mccann wrote:

Just in case you come back with another smart a$$ post, that hole was way to small and maybe it was made by a much smaller crash years before,i think I heard that the locals had described a crash years before in that same spot.

Terry would you like to explain this crash that happened years before and made the hole that was presented to the world as the crash site in 2001?

Maybe give us the flight number? Or the date? or just the year?

That hole/crack was there before 911, there are photographs which seem to prove that. I understood it was just a natural fissure in the ground. I think a plane did crash there BTW, but wouldn't be surprised to learn it was shot down.

You have to ask yourself this: Considering what had happened earlier and knowing the plane had been hijacked, why wouldn’t the military shoot it down? Naturally, of course, it suits everyone to go with the crash explanation.

Terry .. Ignore Team D.U.M.B. They really haven't got a scooby about world politics despite all of their bravado... Jesus !!! Let them get on with it.

The clowns still are going with this complete deception of 911 plane crashes.. OMFG.. incredible. In the real world the debate concerns what weaponry was used ( and Planes are not in the equation )

Many of the benefits from keeping terrorism fear levels high are obvious. Private corporations suck up massive amounts of Homeland Security cash as long as that fear persists, while government officials in the National Security and Surveillance State can claim unlimited powers and operate with unlimited secrecy and no accountability.  AMEN

Post of the year JWH, and of course we the world now because of this false flag have a NEVER-ENDING war on terror

Yes good post John,  how anyone can still believe the official version of what happened on 9/11 is beyond me.

Terry just watched your link to - 'The Boston Unbombing - How and Why it was a Staged Event' - very good video, some of the pictures of moulage makeup  from that day I hadn't seen before and anyone looking at those pics alone should be able to see that this was a hoaxed event.

I'll just put that link up again in case anybody else is interested.

https://vimeo.com/227988627

With the main stream doing their thing,even this p1ss poor attempt to fool us works-Orlando was another one btw

Yes Orlando was another one and there were many more around that time, that's why they started taking down all the truther channels off youtube because they were debunking the stories straight away with great ease.
I don't get my news from the mainstream anymore don't want to be brainwash into thinking a certain way. If I do happen to watch their news nowadays I try and see through all the lies and work out what the hidden agender  is today.

Just tripe

I assume you've realised that the original link given (Attack of the Trouser Snake at the Boston Hoaxathon (Peekay Truth)) was bollocks and you've now replaced it with an equally piss poor link.

Talking among yourself doesn't make what you say any more true it just makes you all look a lot dafter. When's the tin-foil hat party?

Come on tm you can accuse me of being a paid troll if you want. You're just a wimp and a grass.

Tell you what, watch it because you haven't then come back and we can all debate it

I've watched most of the drivel and I've told you before you can't debate as you never answer questions. QED.

Well im going to call you a bloody liar,you haven't watched because if you had, you could only come to the conclusion that it was a false flag, so I know YOU A LIAR.You want debate because you would not have a chance defending it,nobody could.

* Wont debate

You're wrong again tm. I watched most of it and it was nonsense.

No you are a liar, tell me about the guy in the cowboy hat then,and whats your opinion about the woman who very nearly had to have her leg removed,nothing suspicious to you?

What about the guy in the cowboy hat? You have to be a bit specific - I do know who you mean though. And the woman who nearly had to have her leg removed - what are you insinuating? Generalizations Are U. Specifics or nothing is what we need.

Yes, there was a massive spate of false flag events a couple of years ago. The crisis actors were piz poor - couldn't produce tears when they were supposed to be crying while being interviwed. Some of them even smiling with 'dupers delight'

Almost to a man and woman, they called for gun control laws to be tightened at every opportunity. The elite need to disarm the population to make them easy to control, especially in the USA.

As for the Boston 'Bombings' Laughable, just laughable that anyone who has more than a cursory look into it can take it seriously. Just those people stood around with hilariously shredded clothing like you'd see in a cartoon and clean skin underneath is enough on it's own, surely?

Charlie, You lying bastard

Surely not? A video by a clearly deranged nutter who produced videos for a living and believes the earth is flat is what you believe?

Jun 16, 2019 -- 8:18PM, terry mccann wrote:

Charlie, You lying bastard

Are you on drugs? What do you mean?

Charlie see,if you really had watched then you would have said the same as Get Me a Drink who was spot on with his review, Chaz you are a joke.

Nobody called for gun control after the Boston bombing.

In fact if these guys had shot the runners the survivor would not of faced the Death penalty- as would gave been a state crime of murder.

There were hundreds of witnesses to the event. All actors????
Really.

What about the guy in the cowboy hat? You have to be a bit specific

If you don't know who the guy in the cowboy hat is then you never bothered to watch the video.

It means you haven't watched whence YOU LYING BASTARD

I also watched some of the Unbomb video but the bloke who did it was so boring and it was just photographs so was too bored with that. Plus he was wrong.

The first video is clearly a wind up. He gets everything wrong or just makes things up.

I do know who the bloke in the cowboy hat is but what about him?

If you haven't watched then its totally out of order to call it nonsense then. I say to anyone,watch it and if you still don't think its a false flag using very clearly crisis actors,come back and debate.

I'll debate this but will any of you? Let's start at the beginning.

This Peekay Truth guy obviously believes that every bombing was a hoax. Do you agree with him?

Have you ever seen another version of his Boston Bombing video? Is is possible it's an edited video?

Mexico • June 16, 2019 8:22 PM BST

Nobody called for gun control after the Boston bombing.

Probably not, no. But the gun control message is hammered home after every mass shooting.

E.g after the NZ mosque shooting, they tightened up the gun laws there. Someone cynical could be forgiven for believing it was a set up to make the law easier to change.

One of the photographs on the Unbomb video was this one of an injured leg, it's at 28.50 in the video, do you think this is a real leg?

https://vimeo.com/227988627

No and No chaz, crisis actors all from start to finish plus their handlers

It give Obomber the "right" to bomb Syria which was mostly the point of the false flag

tm
Please be a bit clearer.

This Peekay Truth guy obviously believes that every bombing was a hoax. Do you agree with him? You are saying you don't agree with him? So some of the hoaxes he believes in you don't? Can you please be clear what you are answering.

Have you ever seen another version of his Boston Bombing video? Is is possible it's an edited video?
Again please be clear what you are answering.

Sorry, didn't mean the question to be directly at tm it was aimed at all conspiritards.

If you want to debate we need to start at the beginning.

peekay I don't know,Charlie watch the video I put up and let me know when you have in full and when tell me it wasn't a false flag and why. Now that sounds simply enough surely

tm
Ok you failed the first hurdle and it's clear you don't want to debate you just want to spout off. There is no point in discussing things with you.

In future I will just abuse you as you abuse everyone else. Got the rule?

Drink

I hope the message of any sort of gun control in USA is "hammered home" , it is easier for an 18 year old to buy a gun than a pint of beer.

Trump tweeted about how useless mayor of London is because of high murder rate. Would POTUS care to tweet how many gun murders have been in USA in past 2 years (then compare per head of population to London)

Forget what the NRA tells you drink. Guns do kill people.

Yeah chi ive got it,you really cant bullsh1t  this can you, crisis actors from start to finish

So will 5G,EBOLA,VACCINES mex but that's what you the other devils want,you are really sure theres a place for you when it kicks off,i so hope not