Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
i truly love you
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 43
|
By:
Yet another racket from bap, sorry crisp
|
|
By:
Is that the end of Sarina?
|
|
By:
with a bit of luck. She will probably get seeded 5 for Wimbers though. Give her a few bits of cannon fodder before she meets someone like Kenin who can deal with her. How she got seeded 10 for this is beyond me
|
|
By:
probably because she was No.10 in the rankings
|
|
By:
she shouldn't be. Which is my point
|
|
By:
Smart arse
|
|
By:
try talking through your mouth instead of your arse. She went up 6 places in the rankings after doing feck all since the US open. They give her the easiest draw in every tourney & she still can't get it done. Time to go
|
|
By:
that's the tourneys the pinsticker chooses to play, of course. She does nothing for the WTA except take the pee
|
|
By:
Looks like the move from 16 to 11 came after the Australian Open, which she indeed did play
|
|
By:
and with RG going strictly by ranking for their seedings, a player ranked 10 or 11 in the week ahead of the tournament will also be seeded there, or higher (e.g if someone ahead of her in the rankings doesn't play)
|
|
By:
that wouldn't explain being ranked 32 and getting seeded 25 for Wimbers, would it?
|
|
By:
Indeed it wouldn't. You might want to pay attention to where I said "and with RG going strictly by ranking for their seedings", which hints at it being about Roland Garros, not Wimbledon.
|
|
By:
and you might note that i didn't mention RG, but Wimbers. Now you can explain Wimbers seeding?
|
|
By:
Wimbledon, for the men, uses a highly complicated formula for their seedings. For the women they usually go with ranking but bump someone up if they deem them worthy, e.g because they've won the tournament a time or two in the past. Like when they seeded a 59th ranked Sharapova as 24th that one year she came back from injury.
In doing so, Wimbledon is the only major tournament that doesn't strictly go by the seedings. |
|
By:
was disrespectful seeding the 2x champion before pregnancy so low tbh
|
|
By:
*In doing so, Wimbledon is the only major tournament that doesn't strictly go by the rankings for their seedings
|
|
By:
Baphornet 01 Jun 19 19:59 Joined: 02 Nov 18 | Topic/replies: 5,475 | Blogger: Baphornet's blog
that wouldn't explain being ranked 32 and getting seeded 25 for Wimbers, would it? did you not understand this? |
|
By:
& she still does feck all for the WTA. Well except for breaking the rules continually, and acting like a diva for the last 20 years. Good riddance; perhaps she can try a new career in Middleweight boxing? Or maybe the UFC
|
|
By:
& she still does feck all for the WTA.
embarrassing opinion |
|
By:
the complete truth, not an opinion. The embarrassment is hers
|
|
By:
do you think John Mcenroe was an embarrassment to men's tennis
|
|
By:
btw, it can only be a bad and embarrassing opinion that the greatest player of all time has done nothing for women's tennis or WTA. any suggestion otherwise is just dumb
|
|
By:
Mac stayed the same 'shape' all through his career (and still is) a saint compared to Williams. You need to read my posts properly & take the blinkers out of your arse, aaronh. I said "does" twice i think, as in present tense. But if you want to go back over a 20 year period, the WTA has done plenty for her, & has been extremely forgiving; they still are
|
|
By:
|
|
By:
unsurprisingly didn't wanna say yes, perhaps we can agree on Nick Kyrgios being an embarrassment to men's tennis instead?
|
|
By:
Serena (and Venus) are most responsible for the boom in women's tennis and really, the WTA have not really been as respectful as they should be to a 23 time slam champ and the greatest ever
|
|
By:
Baphornet • June 1, 2019 8:03 PM BST
and you might note that i didn't mention RG, but Wimbers. Now you can explain Wimbers seeding? edy • June 1, 2019 8:04 PM BST Wimbledon, for the men, uses a highly complicated formula for their seedings. For the women they usually go with ranking but bump someone up if they deem them worthy, e.g because they've won the tournament a time or two in the past. Like when they seeded a 59th ranked Sharapova as 24th that one year she came back from injury. In doing so, Wimbledon is the only major tournament that doesn't strictly go by the seedings. Baphornet • June 1, 2019 8:06 PM BST Baphornet 01 Jun 19 19:59 Joined: 02 Nov 18 | Topic/replies: 5,475 | Blogger: Baphornet's blog that wouldn't explain being ranked 32 and getting seeded 25 for Wimbers, would it? did you not understand this?  |
|
By:
absolute nonsense. Take the blinkers off. Margaret Court is safe enough, happily
|
|
By:
clutching at straws; a cross post proves nothing
|
|
By:
which part would you consider nonsense
|
|
By:
the -
Nick Kyrgios is an embarrassment/isnt, Serena/Venus are responsible for the boom of women's tennis, or that they didn't show enough respect to their greatest and and probably a top 10 of all timer in her sister |
|
By:
guess, you're good at that
|
|
By:
must be the first, it's the only one that's contentious
 |
|
By:
you started this thread badly wondering why No.10 in the world was seeded 10th and it got worse from there
|
|
By:
Who was ranked 32 and getting seeded 25?
|