Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
31 May 19
11:27
Joined:
Date Joined:
25 Jun 06
She's the "feminist" who doesn't apparently want equality, like many now, she apparently wants things biased against men. She wants misogony as a "hate crime" but when interviewed she dismissed the idea misandry should be. Basically if a man says/does something a woman doesn't like it can be misogny and legally a "hate crime", but if a woman does the same thing to a man that the man doesn't like, it's shouldn't be. Misogony should be a crime, misandry not available as an option. Person A does something to B is a crime, person B does exact same thing to A it isn't, based on a favouritism due to gender.
This is clearly not equality, this is inequality in law, this is very basic you'd think.
To any reasonable person who believes the law should be balanced, this is wrong, it should work both ways.
But to a person who doesn't appear to undersand fairness and equality, they don't see the problem there.
She could just say "yes we should have a level playing field" and that would be that. If misandry never happens then no woman will be convicted of it surely, so what's the problem? You have fairness, everyone is equal. Are the feminists scared women, shock horror, who launch attacks on men might be held up to the same standards? There is a principle here - it doesn't matter what the statistics are, and she doesn't seem to understand this principle which is very frightening. Do the lib dems not understand principles anymore, is all politics now virtue signalling to the SJW gallery?
Prime minister .. We are a country of 65 million people or whatever, can we not for the love of cooked cheese start picking political leaders who are fit for the job.
It's just so depressing. Will the Tories shoot themself in the foot with the next leader .. again?
This is clearly not equality, this is inequality in law, this is very basic you'd think.
To any reasonable person who believes the law should be balanced, this is wrong, it should work both ways.
But to a person who doesn't appear to undersand fairness and equality, they don't see the problem there.
She could just say "yes we should have a level playing field" and that would be that. If misandry never happens then no woman will be convicted of it surely, so what's the problem? You have fairness, everyone is equal. Are the feminists scared women, shock horror, who launch attacks on men might be held up to the same standards? There is a principle here - it doesn't matter what the statistics are, and she doesn't seem to understand this principle which is very frightening. Do the lib dems not understand principles anymore, is all politics now virtue signalling to the SJW gallery?
Prime minister .. We are a country of 65 million people or whatever, can we not for the love of cooked cheese start picking political leaders who are fit for the job.
It's just so depressing. Will the Tories shoot themself in the foot with the next leader .. again?
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 16
|
By:
Yes on last part, look who the candidates are.
Anyway Lib Dem have highest %, in terms of seats it translates to: Labour 202 The Brexit Party 141 Lib Dems 119 Conservatives 110 SNP 57 |
|
By:
Swinson is far too 'full of herself'
Overbearing on Question Time, last night.  |
|
By:
until she got pummelled by Alexandra Phillips
|
|
By:
Horrendous on qt last night.
|
|
By:
they are riding on the crest of a 12 inch wave, before the inevitable drowning. The thought of Farage running the '3rd ' Party certainly woke the mainstream media up. They will be digging Jeremy Thorpe & Joe Grimmond up next
|
|
By:
Swinsons rant where she very deliberately took something Farage said from ages ago out of context and tried deliberately and very dishonestly to re-interpret it as some sort of expression condoning violence was just pathetic and shows someone unfit in maturity and honesty to be a PM. It was just so transparently shallow and gutter "let's be offended at something when even I know they didn't mean that" politics. It's symptomatic of how politics is done now, it reflects the way the professionally offended SJW children act on Twitter.
So probably a shoe in for the LDs then. |
|
By:
Vince Cable was a bad choice but She's even worse.
A condescending virtue signalling 1diot. Has opposed Brexit from the start and has dismissed the leaver vote. BTW if you were a leave voter than to her you are a racist. |
|
By:
She was poor when appearing on Sky News on Friday morning, was easily rattled and later launched in to oversell mode.
|
|
By:
She is very poor on the Andrew Marr show this morning.One snippet from Marr is Ed Davey saying he would stop all internal UK flights in the name of climate change ???? This is getting dafter and dafter.
|
|
By:
let these numpties enjoy their day in the sun. They will collapse quicker than AJ's chin
|
|
By:
 |
|
By:
I thought that was a wind up, but no, Ed Davey the other Lib Dem candidate is on about stopping internal flights in the uk.
.. And people say they are "centrist"... |
|
By:
I don't care and will never vote Lib Dem but is anyone going to post the full context of Ed Davey's quotes or just strip it out and proceed to get outraged
|
|
By:
“We need to make sure we are investing in the trains of the future, not least because we have got to stop internal flights in the UK,” he said at the first leadership hustings on Friday evening. He later qualified this: “Sometimes you have to fly but we need to find ways though our public transport system to minimise the flights that are happening.”
... (Swinson) She said after the hustings that she could not promise to stop taking planes: “I do often travel by train — but I have a constituency 400 miles from London, and I need to do what is necessary to do my job.” She is campaigning for the extension of high-speed rail services to Glasgow. |
|
By:
Whats wrong with hot air balloons.
|
|
By:
Already too much hot air and balloons in British politics
 |