Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
AllinR1
27 Apr 19 19:11
Joined:
Date Joined: 03 Sep 08
| Topic/replies: 856 | Blogger: AllinR1's blog
Slightly old news now. But a DNA expert has offered to test the DNA samples which the British "expert" Dr John Lowe deemed to be too complex to analyse.

Given that the samples could contain the DNA of a potential abductor, it seems strange to me that operation Grange is not biting his arm off for help.

Any thoughts as to why his offer has not been taken?

https://www.9news.com.au/world/madeleine-mccann-perlin-solve-car-dna-gamechanger-sutton-maddie-podcast/a1bac740-7b66-4a3d-b1d3-28ae8e3bf530

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 107
By:
lybertyne
When: 27 Apr 19 19:51
If the McCann case gets wrapped up there won't be any need for trips to Portugal.
By:
blank
When: 27 Apr 19 19:57
They must not have confidence in the other experts abilities. If they preserve the DNA they might be almost certain that they will be able to decipher it in the future with advances in technology, but if they give it to the other expert and it fails they may not be able to use it in the future. Probably takes an expert in DNA and the technology to make that call.
By:
donny osmond
When: 27 Apr 19 20:33
not sure what it would prove, madeline was on holiday with parents who had the car.
By:
Facts
When: 27 Apr 19 21:22
blank


They obviously would only hand over partial samples  containing DNA.
By:
1st time poster
When: 28 Apr 19 12:16
watched a 2hr American special on quest last night if you believe operation grange there were
active burglar gang in area with lots of chatter spome of whoom worked at ocean club so had knowledge of tapas 7 unlocked empty rooms,so with access to 3/4 empty rooms only thing they stole was a 3 yr old kid, ffs
childless couple who had spotters in street casing joint for days before snatching kid
highly organised peado gang with spotters,watchers casing joint for days before snatching kid
murat according to tanner paradiong up and down street
mcaans,tapas 7 up and down street every 30 mins

whole area must have been busier than oxford street on a Saturday afternoon,suprised threy didn't all bump into each other in the street like a carry on film
and yet no evidence of a break in and mcaans only finger print on windows /shutters
By:
lybertyne
When: 28 Apr 19 12:19
Girl wouldn't go bed, daddy hit her too hard.
By:
The Dragon
When: 28 Apr 19 13:40
excellent documentary on this on netflix wellworth a watch.

convinced me that the parents had nothing to do with it for sure
By:
Ramruma
When: 28 Apr 19 14:54
@lybertyne -- Girl wouldn't go bed, daddy hit her too hard.

Unlikely but the question remains, where's the body? Whatever theories you come up with, and after a few seconds' thought, how about -- she's three; woke up needing the toilet; needed a parent for wiping duties; went out of the flat to look for them -- which seems more likely than two (sober at this stage) doctors losing their rag at a toddler, the questions remain the same.

Was she abducted, is she still alive, and where is she?
By:
tobermory
When: 28 Apr 19 15:05

Apr 28, 2019 -- 1:40PM, The Dragon wrote:


excellent documentary on this on netflix wellworth a watch.convinced me that the parents had nothing to do with it for sure


Crazy it is a terrible series. Though as it is aiming to persuade people they had nothing to do with it ( by leaving out a lot of info that incriminates them ) I suppose it succeeds on it's own terms.

By:
tobermory
When: 28 Apr 19 15:06
Zero evidence she was abducted. Zero evidence she is alive ( some evidence that she is dead)
By:
tobermory
When: 28 Apr 19 15:09

Apr 27, 2019 -- 7:57PM, blank wrote:


They must not have confidence in the other experts abilities. If they preserve the DNA they might be almost certain that they will be able to decipher it in the future with advances in technology, but if they give it to the other expert and it fails they may not be able to use it in the future. Probably takes an expert in DNA and the technology to make that call.


Why try and solve it already, only been 12 years. Just wait 20 years till technology moves on...

By:
Facts
When: 28 Apr 19 15:18
Apr 28, 2019 -- 1:40PM, The Dragon wrote:

excellent documentary on this on netflix wellworth a watch.convinced me that the parents had nothing to do with it for sure

Crazy it is a terrible series. Though as it is aiming to persuade people they had nothing to do with it ( by leaving out a lot of info that incriminates them ) I suppose it succeeds on it's own terms.



I agree, Netflix documentary series very biased toward their claims of innocence. Despite leaving out or rebuffing evidence, I am still ( on balance) of the opinion ,there is something very odd about the parents.
By:
AllinR1
When: 28 Apr 19 15:23

Apr 28, 2019 -- 1:40PM, The Dragon wrote:


excellent documentary on this on netflix wellworth a watch.convinced me that the parents had nothing to do with it for sure


You are the first person to say this about the Netflix documentary. Watch the Bogart series on YouTube. He goes over all the evidence and inconsistencies, and you will be left in no doubt as to what happened.

It would be interesting to see your opinion after watching it The Dragon.

Operation Grange seemingly do not want Dr Perlin ( a pioneer in this field) to analyse the DNA, which John Lowe found beyond his capabilities for two possible reasons.

1. Because it's likely Madeleine's DNA will be extracted.
2. It will expose John Lowe (the British DNA "expert") and lead to questions as to why the parents have not been treated as suspects.

By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 28 Apr 19 15:29
jeez, another mccan thread, time to let your obsession go allinR1 and others. Btw, what tober never metions is that the crime scene and it's evidence was trampled all over for 24 hours before it was sealed off with all and sundry coming and going, and the fact it was a rented apartment, God knows how many people would have had a cut key to the it not to mention family members of the owners, or the fact the apartment was situated  on the periphery of the complex on the ground floor, quick easy access in and out, or how exactly could they possibly have disposed of the body in a short space of time never to be found. Keyboard warriors very good at pointing the finger at selective 'evidence', very poor at balanced observations, and that's because it's a great chance to showcase what great parents they are, look at me I would never leave my kids home alone, look at them what horrible people, they must be guilty, and their phoney hatred becomes palpable when they have  likeminded company, 'gang mentality'. Turn it in ffs, we get the message, you are the greatest parent in the world.
By:
Facts
When: 28 Apr 19 15:33
Keys cut ?

The apartment wasn't locked was it ?
By:
AllinR1
When: 28 Apr 19 15:36
SA, you would know that the McCann's claimed the doors were left UNLOCKED (as most people do with three young children abroad), so no need for a key. Kate McCann also claimed the window was open when she found it, yet nobody else claimed this.

It's unfortunate that the scene was not closed off earlier, however, I don't see how this is significant in the grand scheme of things.

SA you keep giving your opinion here but you don't even seem to know the basics.
By:
Facts
When: 28 Apr 19 15:39
Who is SA ?
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 28 Apr 19 15:40
The front door was locked, the patio doors at the back unlocked, locked or unlocked, an intruder would bring keys and leave his fingerprints/dna present, it's one of the first areas forensics check.
By:
AllinR1
When: 28 Apr 19 15:43
SH
By:
AllinR1
When: 28 Apr 19 15:48

Apr 28, 2019 -- 3:40PM, scandanavian_haven wrote:


The front door was locked, the patio doors at the back unlocked, locked or unlocked, an intruder would bring keys and leave his fingerprints/dna present, it's one of the first areas forensics check.


Exactly, and there were no fingerprint or DNA of an intruder found! You seem to suggest the fact that the scene was not cornered off right away means all evidence would disappear, and I don't believe that is correct at all.

Why do you think Kate changed her story to say that the window was open when she got there? Yet in their statements none of the tapas mention the window being opened. Kate decided to close it and not mention it to anyone?

Even Colin Sutton suggests that there was an attempt to wash blood away, which helps explain why John Lowe failed to brake down the samples. But here we have a pioneer, with a successful background offering his services, and no one is biting his arm off!

Some people just believe what they want to believe regardless of evidence and facts.

By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 28 Apr 19 15:54
prehaps they were wearing those hand protection equipment formely known as gloves.
The window in the bedroom had a lock, cleaners unlocked and open windows to let air in whilst cleaning, who knows if they forgot to lock it. I imagine in Kate's complete frantic state she could not remember what was like what, all she knew was her child was missing. Where there is blood people do tend to try and wash it away rather than leave it thereCrazy and you last line is laughable as that describes you. time to let your obsession with a missing little girl go, it's unhealthy now.
By:
the old nanny ;-)
When: 28 Apr 19 16:11
"time to let your obsession with a missing little girl go"

If the doors to the Flat were Left open , they should have been charged with Neglect , if this were a working class couple that would have happened , How can anyone Leave 3 little kids in a Flat and Go out on the PISH popping back every Half hour
??? INCREDIBLE BEHAVIOUR IMO ..

That's why people have an obsession with the case , Seems to have been an obsession of throwing millions of Pounds at it As well ..

MY MRS WOULD NEVER " NEVER " leave our Girls alone in our own house never mind in a flat in a strange Resort , They are guilty of Neglect at a Minimum , END OF >
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 28 Apr 19 16:17
the old nanny, that first paragraph is exactly what I'm talking about, yet another open goal for people to declare what great parents they are.

I don't even think necessarily that they are innoncent, I've no idea and would not be surprised either way as there is not enough compelling evidence either way, Gerry is certainly an odd fellow, his "f off I'm not here to enjoy myself" quote on the bus pre disapperance is bizarre, and he comes across as odd in interviews, but that's obv not enough for evidence lol.

As for the working class thing, I agree. But that's not why people have an obsession at all.
By:
AllinR1
When: 28 Apr 19 16:59

Apr 28, 2019 -- 3:54PM, scandanavian_haven wrote:


prehaps they were wearing those hand protection equipment formely known as gloves.The window in the bedroom had a lock, cleaners unlocked and open windows to let air in whilst cleaning, who knows if they forgot to lock it. I imagine in Kate's complete frantic state she could not remember what was like what, all she knew was her child was missing. Where there is blood people do tend to try and wash it away rather than leave it there and you last line is laughable as that describes you. time to let your obsession with a missing little girl go, it's unhealthy now.


I'm trying not to laugh at this. The window being locked or not locked is irrelevant. Kate claimed she found the window open when she checked the room, yet not one other person who "trampled" on the crime scene stated it was open! That's because it wasn't open!!

As for the blood, why was there blood behind the sofa? And why would the McCann's want to wash away blood that wasn't theirs, which is hidden behind the sofa!!!! Especially when it's not their apartment!!

You keep trying to find an answer for everything, yet you are not doing a good job!!

Watch the Bogart series and then you will know (based on facts and evidence what really happened). Anyone who wants to know the facts has to watch it.

https://youtu.be/5F1RLNQ4-kI

By:
AllinR1
When: 28 Apr 19 17:01
Btw Gerry's "f off I'm not here to enjoy myself" is irrelevant, as Bogart says, it's just a saying, nothing more.
By:
Get me a drink
When: 28 Apr 19 17:12
Of course people are still going to be interested in this story, what with the hysteria that's been whipped up by the media frenzy and the fact that the big mystery has yet to be solved as she is still missing

The netfix series was awful in that it gave the impression that (unlike Portugal) it's perfectly normal behaviour in Britain to leave very young children without supervision all evening whilst you go out enjoying yourself. It certainly isn't.

When you see the local Portuguese women in floods of tears / real emotion on their faces, it's in stark contrast to the parents behaviour during press conferences. They looked unconcerned, with the mother doing that 'no tears' fake crying / broken voice thing, Gerry putting his arm around her looked a deliberate act, no spontaneity or naturalness about it . This was the very next day after Maddy went missing.

Fishy.
By:
lybertyne
When: 28 Apr 19 17:30
I wouldn't trust Netflix to tell me what day of the month Christmas falls on.
By:
1st time poster
When: 28 Apr 19 17:38
did nexflix mention how Gerry,s tennis lesson went
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 28 Apr 19 18:05
Police enter room and don't bother sealing anything off, window shut?....google casa pia. High ranking people involved in abuse. Would make sense not following protocol on the day when you think about. If you think the McCanns's are fishy, no more as fishy as Goncarlo Amaro.
By:
The Dragon
When: 28 Apr 19 18:35
just sayingas i saw it inept Portuguese police, Cant think why (NF) they would report from a biase perspective????

Abducted by persons unknown for me
By:
AllinR1
When: 28 Apr 19 18:56

Apr 28, 2019 -- 6:35PM, The Dragon wrote:


just sayingas i saw it inept Portuguese police, Cant think why (NF) they would report from a biase perspective????Abducted by persons unknown for me


Watch the Bogart series and (based on evidence and facts) am sure that you will think and see things differently.

The big shame is that Amaral was not allowed to do his job properly, which was to follow the evidence. The British government are to thank for that.

Also in the aftermath of her disappearance nobody could account for Gerry's whereabouts, when everyone else was either in the apartment or outside searching. During this time, the Smith family saw a man carrying a child. Their sketch of the man strongly resembles Gerry and he later  said he was more sure than not it was Gerry McCann. There are so many inconsistencies it's unbelievable.

Scandinavian, I'm assuming that you haven't bothered to watch Bogart's series. It will open your eyes to what really happened, not just what the McCann's and MSM have been feeding.

By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 28 Apr 19 19:02
sure I mentioned this in the last marathon McCann thread about Bogart, but why do you think he has disabled comments on nearly all of his videos? no counter arguments, no debates, no questioning of his analysis, nothing, nothing allowed, you will believe what I tell you to believe style of documentary making is not really worth the watch is it.
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 28 Apr 19 19:03
As for Amaral, guy was a loudmouth clown who could/would not stop behaving so amateurishly making a series of grandsweeping public statements - before going on to sell a book about it/make money from a 'dead child' - his assumption.
By:
AllinR1
When: 28 Apr 19 19:52

Apr 28, 2019 -- 7:02PM, scandanavian_haven wrote:


sure I mentioned this in the last marathon McCann thread about Bogart, but why do you think he has disabled comments on nearly all of his videos? no counter arguments, no debates, no questioning of his analysis, nothing, nothing allowed, you will believe what I tell you to believe style of documentary making is not really worth the watch is it.


I really don't believe he disables the comments. His videos aren't monetised either and there are a few episodes,/trailers which comments are still allowed.

As for Amaral,i completely disagree.he was trying to do his job until the McCann's got the media involved so they could publicise their preferred narrative and hinder the investigation, which is exactly what they achieved. And then of course Gordon brown sent in Clarence Mitchell so he could feed the public misinformation, which he succeeded in doing so.

The McCann's stopped him from doing his job, which he lost because he refused to budge from the actual evidence (good for him!), He lost everything including his family for sticking to his principles and job.

He releases a book which not only defends himself but tells the world what really happened as opposed to the McCann's who raised millions from the public , money which has mainly been used to further their lives.

It's so frustrating that you can't see what's gone on. Please watch all of Bogart's series!!!

By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 28 Apr 19 20:07
'The Madeleine McCann case solve' part 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 - comments are disabled, only part 14/15 'the closing arguments' are comments not disabled. The other vids are random debunking vids.

He had a reputation for  heavy handedness in previous cases, he sold a book for money, get over it, he was unprofessional and kept spouting off in public, he could not care less whether she's dead or alive.
By:
AllinR1
When: 28 Apr 19 20:16
Well the comments section was at some point was enabled for all episodes.

Anyway, there's more chance of getting through to a brick wall. Why are you so obsessed with the comments section anyway? If it was on TV you would just take the information his hard work  has presented and move on.

Anyhow, according to you Amaral is disgraced. Neither he Portuguese people nor the Portuguese supreme court agree with you.

I'd suggest that if you don't like the topic, and you clearly don't let facts of evidence get in the way of your opinion, then you should stay off these threads.
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 28 Apr 19 20:24
We'll take you word for it it was, but now it is disabled, kaput, can't say anything, can't challenge anything.

Ah the Portugese establisment - you mean all those types caught up in Casa Pia? or the types who were so unprofessional they didn't not have the brains to tape off the crime scene for 24 hours ffs.

I suggest you stop obsessing over a missing girl that nobody has any real idea about, there are people paid and paid well to find out what happened and after 12 years nothing, also I'm sure you would like me to stay off as it means you have carte blanche to keep peddling the same old tired rubbish.
By:
scandanavian_haven
When: 28 Apr 19 20:30
Wouldn't be the first time you were caught out lying though would it?

reminds me of this on the last thread where you just randomly lie




Firstly - let's look at how quickly you shift the goal posts

AllinR1
Apparently no body = no death

Then

AllinR1
You have certainly implied that no body means she's unlikely to have died in that apartment, when all the evidence and the belief of the Portuguese police (who know much more than us) suggest that is what happened.



So you've quickly went  from saying that I said there was no body so no death to that I implied that no body means she's unlikely to have died in that apartment



Let's look at what I actually said.

scandanavian_haven 17 Mar 19 00:26
The truth of the matter is this, until there is a body found, everything else will just be either circumstantial or inconclusive, there is no hard evidence whatsoever.

scandanavian_haven 17 Mar 19 16:24
I don't remember saying that she did not die there, I haven't got a clue whether she is dead or alive and if she is dead where she died, what I've said is that unless a body is found, nobody will ever really know what happened, there is nothing conclusive.

No mention whatsoever that I said conclusively there was no body no death OR that I said it was unlikely she died there because there was no body, there above you can clearly see I said nobody knows either way and I haven't called it either way.
By:
1st time poster
When: 28 Apr 19 20:43
that would be the crime scene with according to kate open doors,forced windows and abductors on the loose as she left her 2 twins alone after their sister was taken [ they've took her ] and went back to tgapas bar
Page 1 of 3  •  Previous 1 | 2 | 3 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com