|
By:
Most people dumped their record collections when the cd evolved but some shrewdies kept them.
![]() |
|
By:
Rock and pop music , all music really , lost something when digital recordings and cds came in
Vinyl was richer , more beautiful |
|
By:
Even the oldest recording from the early part of the 20c even scratchy and crackly will sound better than a modern digital recording
|
|
By:
Do you own any from the early 20c?
|
|
By:
: ) 70s mainly ( not the 1870s)
|
|
By:
But an analogue recording from 1870s ( did they record then ? not sure )will be better than a modern digital recording
|
|
By:
I think the oldest original recordings in my collection are on a Leadbelly compilation, albeit on a CD, not sure they were all released on vinyl.
|
|
By:
beautiful anyway
|
|
By:
Possibly they were in some form, but you'd have to be a proper serious collector to find them.
|
|
By:
I don't own any vinyl pre 60s, I'm not sure what the oldest one I've got is.
|
|
By:
Anyone know the date of the first tune recorded on vinyl and the first released commercially?
|
|
By:
I have vinyl records from 50s , 60s , 70s , 80s and probably before that can’t remember they’re in boxes in the roof space of my mums house
They’ve been there and I haven’t seen them for years , hundreds of them |
|
By:
Most people dumped their record collections when the cd evolved but some shrewdies kept them
You mean some right tight b$£*$%&s. Bet you've still got the old plastic ones. ![]() |
|
By:
Wouldn’t want to sell them ever probably
|
|
By:
And therein lies the disadvantage of vinyl; if you have a very large collection you either need a massive house or you bung them all up in the loft somewhere. Same with books. From that POV you can see the advantage of having everything on digital files, but you still get the feeling that the younger generation are missing out in many ways.
|
|
By:
I’ve a lot of old books stored there as well : )
|
|
By:
Vinyl records and books , I wouldn’t mind if computers had never been invented if it wasn’t for betfair lol
|
|
By:
Yeah, I'd love to have everything on vinyl and paper, but I'd need a massive library in the ancestral mansion to store it all.
|
|
By:
Wouldn't bother with VHS
|
|
By:
I'd have a private cinema next to the library.
|
|
By:
Staff of 6.
|
|
By:
Projectionist, sound engineer, waiter, cocktail maker, cleaner, french polisher.
|
|
By:
And a collection of vintage motorbikes , that would be fine : )
oh well , nite nite it’s too late |
|
By:
7 here Mouse. Same as you but I have an Oberfuhrer to control them.
|
|
By:
True aka - His Masters Voice with the wee dug.
![]() lfc could be sitting on a bigger fortune with his collection. Records going for crazy prices. |
|
By:
It's tough parting with some but everything is for sale at the right price.
|
|
By:
I've got 5000 + 7" singles (all 1956 - 1964)!
Rock 'n' Roll, D*o-w*p and 1960s Pop! |
|
By:
Sex Pistols - God Save The Queen - original single with brown paper bag £10,000.
Frank Wilson - Motown single - Do I love You £15,000. The Beatles - Love Me Do - one sided acetate single £80,000 - demos of same single with Paul`s name spelt "McArtney" £5000 plus. The Quarrymen - That`ll Be The Day - original acetate £100,000 Elvis Presley - My Happiness - original 1958 copy £200,000 plus You could be sitting on a fortune Norfolk. Any original Beatles records from 60s are worth a lot. |
|
By:
mouse muldoon Joined: 05 Jun 03
Replies: 19961 21 Mar 19 00:42 I think the oldest original recordings in my collection are on a Leadbelly compilation, albeit on a CD, not sure they were all released on vinyl. I almost posted a youtube link to Leadbelly on the Titanic thread last night. 'Jack Johnson went to get on board...' |
|
By:
i starred in a vhs video when camcorders first came out.
I beleive its still stored my the met police in their evidence room. |
|
By:
I suppose the irony is in 1000 years time vinyl records will still work well, perhaps virtually as good as new, CDrs, CDs I believe, hard drives, magnetic tapes etc will all have failed. Maybe I should get buried with some of my favourite albums, so when some future Alice Roberts digs me up, then can still get an idea of what fantastic taste I have.
|
|
By:
mac - Re your post to Norfolk - "Any original Beatles records from 60s are worth a lot". This is not true, but Norfolk knows anyway
. |
|
By:
mac - Re your post to Norfolk - "Any original Beatles records from 60s are worth a lot". This is not true, but Norfolk knows anyway
. |
|
By:
The myth of vinyl being worth fortunes continues at pace
There is some truth in this of course but very little in % terms is worth very much at all, and many of the prices quoted are based on asking prices as opposed to prices realised. The things that are worth money are very specific - demo's, obscures, mint first pressings by initially unsaleable artistes etc etc. |
|
By:
I had quite a few 60s LPs. Searched them online and not worth the effort of trying to sell.
Gave them to a jumble sale. |
|
By:
Or keep them.
I have over 500 vinyl records that are worthless but playing them and listening to them is something special. Why something that you enjoy has to have value outside your enjoyment is rather strange. |
|
By:
Blackbarn
£2.50p is a lot to a Scotsman ![]() |
|
By:
Just reading back through this thread wtf can't you say Doo****.
|
|
By:
Perhaps its w o p that is the problem? Can you get round it with Doowop.
|