let me rock the corner stone of the very foundation to science.

What does it do?

its magnetism that moves light in my opinion.

brass, in the opening post you said it was a fact, in your second post you said IMO.

It doesn't travel but it moves. So something that moves isn't travelling?

light has no speed.thats what i am saying.every test will give a different answer,in other words nobody knows how far anything is away from us..
and the maths i did prove it.eurekaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(brass does it again)

One minute something is a fact, the next is an opinion, this is not good for people that have trust issues.

or how it will take to get there,now watch the news in a few days as all the scientists claim my theory,think about it ,if i am correct,ALBERT is wrong,Newton is wrong,Hubble is wrong,HIGGS IS WRONG.THEY WILL ALL BE WRONG.

i am too excited with my findings,im off to make a few phone calls to help me find out more.i will be back soon.

What speed do you predict your phone signal will be travelling at?

Filmed at one trillion frames per second, watch light pass through a coke bottle.  Actual bit starts at 1:46 after some waffle.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtsXgODHMWk

watch light pass through a
...light doesnt travel.

You are confusing me

https://youtu.be/EtsXgODHMWk?t=106

lybertynes video at 1.46

Can you go straight to 0.51 on the perrier vid?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRIRACUmTPE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbO78oDPN9s?t=18000

https://youtu.be/rRIRACUmTPE?t=51

come again?

https://www.youtu.be.com/watch?v=CbO78oDPN9s?t=18000

no listen to what i say"i dont think i am crazy,but i think light is drawn towards a force,it may be gravity,it may be magnetised,ot it could be part of our eyes that make us think that the light is moving out ,but i have to think more,if lightening hits our earth ,its not the lightning coming down its something on our earth pulling it down.and the light from the sun or the stars are being drawn down rather than it is arriving.
thats my theory at the moment,in other words there could be no such thing as the speed of light.
as i say i have to go back to the drawing board and think twice.but i know i am correct but i have to prove it.

https://www.youtu.be.com/watch?v=CbO78oDPN9s?t=180

i am really excited about this idea,i have thought about.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kNk_fzmTyI

i know you guys think i have lost it,but if i am correct in my finding the origin content of the whole universe could have come from a faulty massive black hole,with all contents escaping or drawn out of it ,meaning time always was.this is big stuff.

Wasn't it James Clerk Maxwell who said it's electromagnetic radiation that carries light?

Brass, try not to rock the corner stone of the foundation of science too much, it could lead to more religious loons making a comeback.

i believe in a god.=a god of nature,and he does not care about anything only nature itself.a complete different guy than the guy who sits on a cloud and has a beard.this guy drives all the atoms of the universe,even the thought atoms that make a guy gamble.if i pray to him and he corrects my thought atoms when i punt he might answer me with a few winners.his name is SPINOSA.

I knew I should have paid more attention in school to my Physics lessons

I know have to decide who is right Einstein or Brassneck, tricky

Have just sold all my shares in Laser manufacturer thanks to brasses revelation. Measurements and levels will all be found to be wrong.

let me put it this way,when lightning strikes a tree,i say its the energy in the tree that attracts the lightning rather than the lightning randomly selecting a target.

if i build a house beside the tree and place a copper roof on the house ,the lightning will strike the house and leave the tree alone,this proves that lightning  is attracted rather then randomly travelling.

The crims will strike a copper roof quicker than lightening imho.

based on my theory ,if i cover another planet with copper i would be able to direct all the light from the sun away from our earth and direct it to my copper planet,and at a faster speed.proving that light has no exact speed.

So it follows that when the scientists worked out the speed that light travels all those years ago,they worked out the speed that the light of our sun took to reach our earth and not the correct speed, as light has no exact speed using the brassneck theory.

So it follows that when the scientists worked out the speed that light travels all those years ago,they worked out the speed that the light of our sun took to reach our earth and not the correct speed, as light has no exact speed using the brassneck theory.

cooperman

so the speed of light is not correct in all experiments ,and should be "experiments based on the speed of light that it takes for light to travel from our sun to our earth.this is distorting figures as regards the light all over the universe.imvho

so when Hubble said planet x is 50 billion light years away, if i am correct planet x is 50 billion light years away based on the TIME it takes the light of our sun to light up our earth.I STRESS THIS IS IN MVHO.

so when Albert says that space bends light ,i think whats really happens is that the light is getting conducted,this theory would fall in with what Albert called "space time" but i say the time is distorted because of the conducting of the light,and Albert would be basing his experiments on the
SUN -EARTH light travelling time,that was proved ????????????? many years before.
so its time for me to think again and read what Nikola Tesla had to say about it,"because would know more about it that myself or Albert"