why has Salmond been named in the press ?

there's a clue there see if you can spot it

Have they arrested  Mr Robinson yet?

You would have thought that the powers that be would have realised that double standards and the  lack of consistency  are a major driver of anger and discord.

Have they named the 55 recently arrested for rape and grooming in Dewsbury and Batley?

Larry, curly and a lot of mo,s

This deliberate shielding of certain gangs who carry out appalling acts against children, is part of the widespread practice of playing down the crimes committed by these types in the interest of maintaining public order.
They're trying to pull the wool over the public's eyes, and hoping we won't notice what they our leaders have inflicted on society.

Indeed when someone tries to expose the extent of the problem, they themselves end up being demonised like in the case of Robinson.
That in itself takes the focus away from the criminals' wrong doings, and suddenly they can become the victims of Robinson.
Which all deters others from speaking out.

One has to consider who exactly is the real enemy?

The people who commit the crimes, or the authorities who protect them?

You can be absolutely sure the Liberal British Media will focus disproportionately on any white man facing charges like this, rather than on the Industrial Scale PROVEN and CONVICTED paedophile gangs.

The LBM will savage him, his work for the objective and balanced Russian media is another black mark in their eyes.

They won't name the 55 from Dewsbury and Batley in order to avoid confusion . It is highly likely that each name will also be the name of several other Dewsbury / Batley inhabitants who have not (as yet) been charged with any crime and will be wrongfully tarnished . Seven of the twenty men recently convicted in Huddersfield shared the same name , therefore highlighting the problem faced  by naming the accused .

" flushgordon1 • January 25, 2019 9:46 AM GMT
Larry, curly and a lot of mo,s "
Subtle

The rules are as follows.

A: Gang from community X can do what they like for years no matter how depraved, the authorities will look the other way for the duration, and the media will refuse to cover it, protect them, and call anyone who questions it "waycist". The BBC will refuse to cover it or give it token few seconds.
B: Any white guy accused of anything (like Cliff Richard and other celebs never mind normal folk) will have every resouce the authorities can muster thrown at them, blanket coverage, torn apart, their reputations and careers ruined. The BBC will send a freakin helicopter to hover over the house as they search it on rolling coverage, film through private windows with long lenses, and end up taken to court for their wreckless pleasure as they act like a reactionary tabloid as they try their best to do as much sensationalist damage as possible. Revelling in their own self importance.

Some might question a double standard here, but of course you'll be called a "fascist" for doing so ...

BTW I noticed Salmond's wording on this is "I am innocent of any criminality",an interesting choice of words. This is different to "The events never happened".  He is a married man, regardless of how this goes, I doubt he'll come out of this smelling of Thistles. "L'eau du Braveheart, by Paco Rabanne"!

He's effectively admitting to 'liasons' but challenging his accusers to prove they weren't consensual.

I thought the militant feminists (of which the SNP is packed, including the virtue signalling "men") vehemently disapproved of men in power going anywhere near staff?  A bit "Clinton" - have cigars been mentioned? . Regardless, I'm guessing the usual double standards will be applied by his supporters. Interesting times!

Haw hen dae yae fancy a wee snoak at ma skean du?

^^^^
Little known burns poem