Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
16 Nov 18
13:20
Joined:
Date Joined:
25 Jun 06
Just some of the 100 million+ killed by communism.
Diane Abbot to say "on balance they did more good than harm" and Corbyn to see if he can them here on an asylum claim?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB4o5n2EGyA
Diane Abbot to say "on balance they did more good than harm" and Corbyn to see if he can them here on an asylum claim?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uB4o5n2EGyA
Show More
*can get them.
I drop words more often than I drop bad puns....
I drop words more often than I drop bad puns....
JC, didn't you get the memo about cuddly communism ?
hush now, there's a good chap
hush now, there's a good chap
They were not proper socialists.
They did not do it right.
They did not do it right.
And she's laughing about it too.
Chilling.
That's what 'For The Many, Not The Few' means when you put it into action. You identify your 'few' and slaughter them, but how can you remain in power other than by identifying more minorities for the 'many' to slaughter? You start with the landowners, then it's the shareholders, then it's the homeowners, then it's the shopkeepers, then it's the wreckers and slackers in the workforce, then it's the saboteurs.
It goes on for decades, a million shot here, a million starve there, until finally you've crushed society to the extent there's no hope, no wealth and no joy left to attack. And finally, then, you return to capitalism (or 'freedom', as normal people call it).
It happens exactly the same way every single bloody time: from France in 1789 to 1815, through Russia and its conquered territories from 1917 to 1991, in China from 1946 right up to this very moment.
One thing you never get is the chance to vote this ideology out after five years. Once you realize the Many have identified you as one of the next Few to face the gulag, it's too late.
Chilling.
That's what 'For The Many, Not The Few' means when you put it into action. You identify your 'few' and slaughter them, but how can you remain in power other than by identifying more minorities for the 'many' to slaughter? You start with the landowners, then it's the shareholders, then it's the homeowners, then it's the shopkeepers, then it's the wreckers and slackers in the workforce, then it's the saboteurs.
It goes on for decades, a million shot here, a million starve there, until finally you've crushed society to the extent there's no hope, no wealth and no joy left to attack. And finally, then, you return to capitalism (or 'freedom', as normal people call it).
It happens exactly the same way every single bloody time: from France in 1789 to 1815, through Russia and its conquered territories from 1917 to 1991, in China from 1946 right up to this very moment.
One thing you never get is the chance to vote this ideology out after five years. Once you realize the Many have identified you as one of the next Few to face the gulag, it's too late.
That's what 'For The Many, Not The Few' means when you put it into action. You identify your 'few' and slaughter them
September 1939. Communist Russia invades western Ukraine in conjunction with its Nazi German allies invading Poland.
The many millions of Russian workers had already cleared the few million farmers out of eastern Ukraine, by starving 4 million of them to death in 1933 alone. Now the workers came looking for a few more targets.
The door gets kicked open. You have a farm you'd cleared by hand from a hectare of forest a landowner gifted your mother for her work.
"How do you make the hay?"
"I pay a couple of men to mow it every summer."
"Kulak! Exploiter!"
Bang.
And the rest of the family off to the camps, until the survivors return fifty years later.
The triumph of the many over the few.
The many millions of Russian workers had already cleared the few million farmers out of eastern Ukraine, by starving 4 million of them to death in 1933 alone. Now the workers came looking for a few more targets.
The door gets kicked open. You have a farm you'd cleared by hand from a hectare of forest a landowner gifted your mother for her work.
"How do you make the hay?"
"I pay a couple of men to mow it every summer."
"Kulak! Exploiter!"
Bang.
And the rest of the family off to the camps, until the survivors return fifty years later.
The triumph of the many over the few.
Be fair: Not every far left experiment ends in mass murder and oppression. Look at Venezuela! Small country with worlds biggest oil reserves and ....
it's bankrupt with hyperinflation, one of the crime kidnapping and murder capitals of the world, people fleeing in their droves creating their own "run away from socialism" migrant crisis. But we have the explanation above (yes I know he's being sarcastic!):
"They were not proper socialists.
They did not do it right."
Maybe once 1000 million have been killed by the lar left and 500 countries have been totally ruined they'll get it right, in say 3462?
Can't wait! Bring on Corbyn so we can be one of the tombstones. Strange how walls around far left countries are always to keep people in not out.
it's bankrupt with hyperinflation, one of the crime kidnapping and murder capitals of the world, people fleeing in their droves creating their own "run away from socialism" migrant crisis. But we have the explanation above (yes I know he's being sarcastic!):
"They were not proper socialists.
They did not do it right."
Maybe once 1000 million have been killed by the lar left and 500 countries have been totally ruined they'll get it right, in say 3462?
Can't wait! Bring on Corbyn so we can be one of the tombstones. Strange how walls around far left countries are always to keep people in not out.
I reckon 5 or 10 (or more) of you ought to join in this thread and agree wholeheartedly with the opening post, preferably adding a little reason of your own why Corbyn or Labour are worse than Stalin etc etc, ad nauseum.
Anyone not agreeing is to be labelled "libtard", "Snowflake" or "hand-wringing Guardian reader".
The firm belief that anyone famous/influential reads and supports and is influenced by this continuing guff is something of a mistake some of you seem to be making.
Anyone not agreeing is to be labelled "libtard", "Snowflake" or "hand-wringing Guardian reader".
The firm belief that anyone famous/influential reads and supports and is influenced by this continuing guff is something of a mistake some of you seem to be making.
All I'm interested in influencing is voters.
It's still a constitutional democracy, thankfully, for the many and the few.
It's still a constitutional democracy, thankfully, for the many and the few.
Brilliant Studyform is here with a characteristic hissy fit. Thread complete :)
"The firm belief that anyone famous/influential reads and supports and is influenced by this continuing guff is something of a mistake some of you seem to be making. "
Is this guy literally MENTAL? Is there no end to the ridulous made up views and thoughts that he, in his role as "lord of the forum", projects onto everyone else and decides we all have?
Tell you what SF, don't like us commenting on the news, do one. We don't care.
Is this guy literally MENTAL? Is there no end to the ridulous made up views and thoughts that he, in his role as "lord of the forum", projects onto everyone else and decides we all have?
Tell you what SF, don't like us commenting on the news, do one. We don't care.
lol another deranged fanboy thread , episode 150 i think
Mao Tse Tung, Pol Pot, Stalin, Hitler...all humanists.
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539