|
By:
So is he saying that People Read the Papers then Decided to say he had Attacked them ?
|
|
By:
Nick Ferrari will probably be covering this on Monday.
|
|
By:
A CPS spokesperson said: ‘We have reached an agreement without admission of liability’.
So wtf does that mean ? They just decided to give him money instead of prosecuting ? |
|
By:
It's a pity the money he's been awarded doesn't come out of the pockets of the people who decided to arrest him.
Probably the same types who ignored the child grooming evidence for so long. What an absolute shower of a police force and CPS we have in this country. |
|
By:
Shocking tbh
|
|
By:
keir starmer - I give you your next Labour leader oh fkn ho ho ho
|
|
By:
Whats to Stop like minded people ,to get a few people to bring accusations against them , then Right at the Death they withdraw the
Accusations , The Accused who has claimed Innocence all along Is then Due a pay out , Money shared out Everyone happy ![]() |
|
By:
In a country of 60 million people they are a lot of wackos out there, and it just needs 1 to make a complaint, never mind say 20.
FFS for these "historic" crimes don't they often have it full of people making allegations for places the person had never been to, or on the night specified there was material evidence they were totally a different place etc. Why the powers that be thought it was great to throw £millions and huge amounts of manpower against a celebrity for an unprovable allegation or two from 40 years ago, but ignore industrial scale drug/r@pe gangs with many men and 100s of victims that were happening for many years .. says so much about our "society". I wonder which attributes of the respective "perperators" sent them down each "allocation" path..... |
|
By:
Why the powers that be thought it was great to throw £millions and huge amounts of manpower against a celebrity for an unprovable allegation or two from 40 years ago, but ignore industrial scale drug/r@pe gangs with many men and 100s of victims that were happening for many years .. says so much about our "society".
Spot on JC very ![]() |
|
By:
Pity they don't use lie detectors in the first instance.
It would eliminate an awful lot of false claims, and make them concentrate on the others. Don't tell me lie detectors aren't accurate enough, because compared with the travesties human error and corruption result in they'd be a breath of fresh air. |
|
By:
I think it's a diversionary tactic to go after these softer targets.
The real issue as JC says is the mass rape of thousands of girls. The Establishment, whether it's the Church (Catholic and Protestant), the BBC, the Police (Savile, Rotherham etc) and Councils are up to their necks in it. Even Child Services are heavily criticised. I can't believe Parliament is clean when it comes to these heinous crimes. |
|
By:
We must not upset our Diverse Communities , The Luvvie Seething Brains will not have it .
|
|
By:
We must not upset our Diverse Communities , The Luvvie Seething Brains will not have it .
Back on Planet Earth it is the luvvies who have been targeted, investigated and in some cases jailed on fairly dodgy evidence. |
|
By:
Jimmy was a Favoured Luvvie sex case he used to Molest Mentally handicapped people and have sex Dead Bodies Was at it For
years .. The Luvvies never Noticed ,How strange ? Bit like thousands of Rapists at it up and Down the country , and know one seems to notice. |
|
By:
no
![]() |
|
By:
I always found it strange that Esther Rantzen's husband, Desmond Wilcox, was one of the BBC's top men. and he never knew what Saville was up to
There's a few photo's of Esther and 'JIM', where they are laughing out loud about something, you can't tell me that they never knew what Saville was like and what he was getting up to. They just wanted to keep him happy as they feared for their careers if they said anything, perhaps thats why Esther started childline, maybe there was a tinge of guilt |