This is only one of the reasons we need to be careful who we let in ...

You need to get with the plan. There is absolutely no alternative but to allow the third worlders share Europe, even if it means Europe eventually resembling the third world. They tell us it is inevitable so we must help it along at a pace.

A very poignant but unfortunately true post by saddo.

Estonia stepped forward and offered 5,000 places
for refugees immediately ..
Only 12 “enquired” - as Estonia doesn’t  have a generous  benefits system..
says it all really ..

Do you hate them enough yet to take up arms to defend yourselves against them? I guess it hasn't come to that yet, but that's where we are headed. Whether people like it or not isn't part of the equation.

Does stopping these people, and many like them, from coming in make money? No
Does making the people fight them later to kick them out make money? Yes. It also gives the politicians way more power.

I'm sure Lily Allen thinks they would have been blown up anyway.

By her?

Hate, DT?  Why are you bringing hate into this?

… and who are "they"?

DT is one conspiracy theory away from believing in G5 mind control and chemtrails.

I think occams razor is quite simple here. Lefties love to feel morally superior, letting everyone and their dog from anywhere in makes them feel that.

Remember for Labour one of the reasons they hugely increased immigration was just to wind up the tories? That's the sort we are dealing with.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/6418456/Labour-wanted-mass-immigration-to-make-UK-more-multicultural-says-former-adviser.html

"The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were partly due to a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett. "
"He said Labour's relaxation of controls was a deliberate plan to "open up the UK to mass migration..".
"Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.
"I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn't its main purpose – to rub the Right's nose in diversity"
That's from a guy who was at the heart of it.

The Tories and Big Business are all for mass immigration and anybody with a modicum of common sense will know why.

Jul 31, 2018 -- 4:29PM, trilby22 wrote:

Hate, DT?

It's one of the new shaming words. If you hate anything you are a Nazi.

ffs trilby don't double space. What I said was, the word hate here refers to not liking someone who blows himself up to kill you. Not the hate that the media feeds you with for PC and other crap.

I am pretty sure 10 years from now we'll happily be fighting these people on behalf of our politicians. I said that in 2016 and I am pretty sure that's exactly where we are headed. The politicians just want yo to suffer enough so you take up arms yourself, without them having to justify the next war.

and, they = imports.

I agree detraveller, a huge policy shift is needed and no government will dare attempt it until civil disorder 'forces their hand'.

civil disorder from a bunch of 70-80 year olds that have done nowt but spam a few forums...

no one will force anyone's hand and we won't need the 70-80 year olds. If people can be convinced to invade countries thousands of miles away, its not hard to convince them to fight a war at home. There's a thing called patriotism. The more people suffer form it, the merrier the politicians.

if a known terrorist is allowed to enter the country during an election campaign ,
just as polls are going t1ts up,
i guess you could well be right

It's one of the new shaming words. If you hate anything you are a Nazi.


You don't even have to 'Hate' someone or something to be described as a Nazi by the Progressive Tolerant Left. You generally just have to disagree with them on an issue.

For instance, if you disagree with Britain paying to rescue a Wannabe Terrorist from a premature death in Libya, then pay for him to travel to this country, then pay him benefits to help support him here while he makes plans to kill British concertgoers, that will no doubt make you a 'Nazi' on all known deranged lefty form.

Salman Abedi was a Mancunian born and bred.

Abedi had been on holiday and Libya was one of a number of people whose names were on a list of stranded citizens handed to the crew in charge of the evacuation. They were taken to Malta and then flown back to the UK.

The Mail's story did make clear that Abedi and the other people rescued with him were British citizens, and that the UK government had an obligation to look after him and any other people who might be stranded away from their country.

The basis of the story remains true. Rescued by the UK Navy and repaid us by murdering 22 innocent people including 7 children.
He also injured and traumatised thousands of others. A truly vile and evil creature.

Abedi went to fight on the front line with Jihadis in Libya. His father and mother had moved back to fright there and his brother joined him,I believe. Just an ordinary refugee seeking protection of UK by the sound of it.

They fought against Gaddafi,who wouldn't have been brought down without support from the UK amongst others. At the time they were Cameron's "good guys"
'tis a tangled web we weave....

That's how it always is salmon. The war is fine until it is away from home.

*as long as its away from home

Perhaps if the European countries were told they'd have to take in refugees from the countries they decide to bomb, we might stop bombing others.

Half of Africa's finest young men are aiming for Spain and Italy. Who are we bombing out there?

Yeah i know that argument doens't work for all countries. Free money is easily the biggest motivator of all.

Let's accept that then, rather than pretending that we made these people assault our borders.

Of course the Libyans whom we "freed" from Gaddafi are the ones exploiting the situation by making fortunes out of what I accept are mainly economic migrants.

We can't bring him back. We are being invaded by people wanting a free life, they want to get to Northern Europe where the biggest handouts are, very few will stay in Spain Greece and Italy unless forced to do so.

WAY CYST - a knock on a door soon!!  ho ho

not checking  WAC

So,if we supported the wrong people in Iraq and the wrong people in Libya and the wrong people in Syria , how long do you think it will be before our foreign Office get the message ??

Like to see the FO's betting account.

Another refugee rapist

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6034729/Asylum-seeker-raped-student-17-cemetery-replies-did-not-jailed.html

A Sudanese asylum seeker who raped a  student and then tried to rape a mother in the same cemetery has been jailed for 16 years after admitting the crimes saying: 'Guilty. Yes - why not?'.

I can see the hatred seeping out of your post injera

These people are from a different culture and contribute to our society

I nose.  I reed the guardian

there dosnt seem to be much reporting of this in other newspapers

why would this be so ?

iyo

First I'd heard of it.  This savage should also have his wedding tackle removed as a deterrent to others.

without anaesthetic

What about their human rights............surely that's the most important thing

Human?