Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
impossible123
26 Jul 18 15:23
Joined:
Date Joined: 07 Sep 15
| Topic/replies: 34,128 | Blogger: impossible123's blog
The main reason given by the judge is no chance of a success which contradicts totally against BBC's assertion. Maybe those responsible at the BBC for this foolish and nonsensical decision to appeal would like to consider paying for it for themselves - their combined salaries would go some way towards it - and also the fee incurred by the lawyers of Sir Cliff Richard which the BBC have agreed to pay.

What a bunch of egoistic numpties at the BBC!

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 12
By:
impossible123
When: 15 Aug 18 17:07
The BBC top executives have finally come to their senses - they are NOT appealing against the judgement meted out by a judge about Sir Cliff Richard. I think those involved ought to be sacked or forced to accept early retirement; they do not represent or reflect the feelings or opinions of the general public and licence payers.
By:
Reynard
When: 15 Aug 18 17:51
It's only cost 'em 2000+ license fees . Why not chuck a few more at it ? It's not like the people who made these unlawful decisions are gonna have it taken out of their pockets is it ? Angry
By:
posy
When: 15 Aug 18 17:57
bbc is an organisation not fit for purpose.Basically it's the preseve of luvvies and pinkos who pay each other vast salaries and expenses to ram gay,trans,**** ,you name it agendas down our throats.As bent an organisation as you'd wish to meet.
By:
impossible123
When: 15 Aug 18 18:27
At the BBC it is a well known fact it is more important who you know (or related to) than your professional ability in determining your longevity at the Corporation; doors will be opened with a nudge, and will remain open; a doh-doh connected to a high profile relation at the worst instance would be shifted upstairs or sideways to remain on the gravy train till pensionable age - a job for life.
By:
Just Checking
When: 15 Aug 18 21:46
P----s at the BBC are so desperate to STILL try and pretend they were right in this they had some guy from that joke of a newpaper "the I" to say this was a bad day for press freedom! I await their stout leftie defence of people talking about all these cases like the Huddersfield one, the cases the BBC never like to talk about...
By:
akabula
When: 16 Aug 18 08:35
Press freedom? Press harassment and smearing I think he meant to say.
By:
akabula
When: 16 Aug 18 08:38
I need to get up for work and I can't drag myself away from Neil Diamond on Youtube

That would explain Claudia Winkleman being one of their highest paid females.
By:
akabula
When: 16 Aug 18 08:40
Oops that was Divas comment on the neil Diamond thread. Blush
I'll try again


At the BBC it is a well known fact it is more important who you know (or related to) than your professional ability
That would explain Claudia Winkleman being one of their highest paid females.
By:
trilby22
When: 16 Aug 18 09:48
^ Feck me, just seen who her mum is.  Aye, one big, happy, incestuous, Lefty family is the Beeb all right!
By:
the bloob
When: 16 Aug 18 09:49
who does Claudia know at the Beeb? or who is she related to?

I know it's surprising that she is the highest female earner given how poor she is and what she actually does is very little (Strictly and what else?)

or maybe it's Claudia's heritage that gets her the big pay packet? plenty running things at the Beeb of similar background
By:
lovegod
When: 16 Aug 18 11:39
She's the daughter of journalist Eve Pollard who used to get a few gigs on the beeb.
By:
terry mccann
When: 16 Aug 18 12:36
Here Kitty KittyWhoops
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com