Chit Chat
Welcome to Live View – Take the tour to learn more
Start Tour
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
25 Jul 18
12:24
Joined:
Date Joined:
05 Apr 06
Could be good !
Show More
I don't understand the science but they can synchronise through a plug in twitter app now.
It's the batsh!t mad fascist ladies greatest weapon against the snowtards now.
I'm looking up synchronised breeding cycles right now as one texter to prog said it was nonsense.
Of course James accepted this as gospel as, like all male school attendees, he puts women on a pedestal.
Here :
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menstrual_synchrony
Researchers are divided on whether menstrual synchrony would be adaptive.[4][5][9] McClintock has suggested that menstrual synchrony may not be adaptive but rather epiphenomenonal, lacking any biological function.[5] Among those who postulate an adaptive function, one argument is that menstrual synchrony is only a particular aspect of the much more general phenomenon of reproductive synchrony, an occurrence familiar to ecologists studying animal populations in the wild. Whether seasonal, tidal or lunar, reproductive synchrony is a relatively common mechanism through which co-cycling females can increase the number of males included in the local breeding system.
Conversely, it has been argued that if there are too many females cycling together, they would be competing for the highest quality males; forcing female-female competition for high quality mates and thereby lowering fitness. In such cases, selection should favor avoiding synchrony.[15] Divergent climate regimes differentiating Neanderthal reproductive strategies from those of modern **** sapiens have recently been analysed in these terms.[16]
One additional hypothesis, postulated by Van Arsdale and Tyler, is that menstrual synchronization allows for synchronized birthing, therefore enhancing access to vital nutrition in cases of maternal mortality across tribal populations. In other words, synchronized birthing allowed babies who had lost their primary mothers during or after childbirth to have access to breast milk, thereby improving the chances of child survival.
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menstrual_synchrony
Researchers are divided on whether menstrual synchrony would be adaptive.[4][5][9] McClintock has suggested that menstrual synchrony may not be adaptive but rather epiphenomenonal, lacking any biological function.[5] Among those who postulate an adaptive function, one argument is that menstrual synchrony is only a particular aspect of the much more general phenomenon of reproductive synchrony, an occurrence familiar to ecologists studying animal populations in the wild. Whether seasonal, tidal or lunar, reproductive synchrony is a relatively common mechanism through which co-cycling females can increase the number of males included in the local breeding system.
Conversely, it has been argued that if there are too many females cycling together, they would be competing for the highest quality males; forcing female-female competition for high quality mates and thereby lowering fitness. In such cases, selection should favor avoiding synchrony.[15] Divergent climate regimes differentiating Neanderthal reproductive strategies from those of modern **** sapiens have recently been analysed in these terms.[16]
One additional hypothesis, postulated by Van Arsdale and Tyler, is that menstrual synchronization allows for synchronized birthing, therefore enhancing access to vital nutrition in cases of maternal mortality across tribal populations. In other words, synchronized birthing allowed babies who had lost their primary mothers during or after childbirth to have access to breast milk, thereby improving the chances of child survival.
Not sure if the highest quality males are represented on here.
it has been argued that if there are too many females cycling together, they would be competing for the highest quality males
Understandable, imo. Whatever else you think about Froome, he's got a cracking pair of thighs.
Understandable, imo. Whatever else you think about Froome, he's got a cracking pair of thighs.
remember, women only want the "highest quality" males for financial and status reasons. (think of it as shopping at Harrods)
they don'r meet their physical needs. (for that, they have to slum it at Lidls)
they don'r meet their physical needs. (for that, they have to slum it at Lidls)
Post Your Reply
Please login to post a reply.
Wonder
Instance ID: 13539