
|
By:
I see the loan sharks adverts are more numerous on sky tv. Not connected with the abover???
|
|
By:
Very few immigrants in Scotland if that is what you are getting at. In fact very few outside London.
|
|
By:
one of many causes one thinks
|
|
By:
and it is about unemployment figures generally - just this latest local guy coming back sparked me off (again) about the lies that are put out about the figures
oh and all that immigrant labour bussed into the sandwich factories was lies as well was it ho ho does greencore, sandwiches, minimum wage jog your mind - Northampton and many other places - I think they employ many thousands to the detriment of locals it helps if they can be non unionised too |
|
By:
They could tell us unemployment is zero % and the public would probably buy it, despite seeing 100s if not 1000s of beggers in city centres.
Most of the drop in unemployment figures is easily because of the benefit sanctions (once sanctioned they are actually removed from the unemployment figure ) and the zero hour contract jobs (which can end at any time)its quite sad whn you try and tell people this and they just ignore it or call you a liar. |
|
By:
Chinese prob very Busy Mois 12 Chefs on a Rota
|
|
By:
Case!!!!
![]() |
|
By:
use putt me in my plaice
|
|
By:
2 imports of the female version go through the charity bags early then go to the local boot sale
'please give generously we have children to feed' Entrepreneurs to a man/woman etc to be applauded for their initiative and contributing to our economy of course I must be lying or racist or both |
|
By:
roofing and home repairs ?
can he tarmac my drive? |
|
By:
The figures have always been bolox where do the druggie waster type that don't claim JSA yet have their entire lives paid for and WOULD be capable of working but are seen as lost causes and less of a burden on the purse this way.
Similar things happen with Education figures I've got a relative who's Head of Department at a secondary school and they remove anyone with any mental or physical problem you could imagine from the figures ergo warping the TRUE results. |
|
By:
when caught
|
|
By:
If it's still the case then you can work up to 16 hours and get most benefits paid. So if you work only 16, are you classified as employed???
If single parents (2 million and counting) don't work, they're not classified as unemployed but are classified as employed if they work!! Lots of anomalies I reckon. Disabled? Last November May said she wanted a million of them into work. Eh??? So they're unemployed then?? Nope.. What about a family where both ma and pa work full time but get their money topped up by benefits? They're working but not economically independent. |
|
By:
Good points Injera I have at least 1 relative who fits into the waster category,at least 1 in the single parent (working and not),a few disabled,and 1 or 2 in the 16 hour category all figure skewers
|
|
By:
The only foreigners about here are the English heading north to escape the country formerly known as England.
|
|
By:
Theresa May always sticks her foot in her own mouth, but the media NEVER chase her up on it. funny that.
|
|
By:
The unemployment figures are a sham a distraction and are no longer fit for purpose. If a person is unemployed and seeking work they are entitled to Job Seekers Allowance of about £70 and appear in the figures. A person supposedly in work doing only part time can claim working tax credits (a benefit by any other name) but because they are not claiming Job Seekers this is seen as a success.
The figures also don't include those shoved on pointless courses, those sanctioned or those choosing not to sign on. |
|
By:
another said 'I have the bailiffs coming round'
Someone telling porkies moisok, no bailiffs in Scotland. |
|
By:
semantics old chap - sheriffs then
|
|
By:
you no the systems broke when mp,s openly brzag on tv that millions of workers don't earn enough to pay tax, with millions now on umberella,ltd company paying a fraction of the tax they should be paying, the question should be if more people are in work than ever before why are public services worse than ever before,logic says they should be better than ever before,
![]() |