Forums
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
john92
24 Jan 18 13:16
Joined:
Date Joined: 13 Jan 05
| Topic/replies: 5,100 | Blogger: john92's blog
For not providing an interpreter for the support acts at a gig she was at with her children.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 45
By:
moisok
When: 24 Jan 18 13:20
I am appalled. Have taken a fence and flung the gate at it as well.
By:
Gin
When: 24 Jan 18 13:43
FFS! I've heard it all now (no pun intended)..........
By:
Slicer
When: 24 Jan 18 13:46
I represent the Fat Thighs Society and consequently I won't have a word said against the members of Little Mix.
By:
alun2005
When: 24 Jan 18 14:04
I couldn't make my mind up as to which was the more laughable NON news story on the News at One.

Was it the one above, or this fundraiser where women were reportedly sexually abused left right and centre, yet none of them phoned 999?
By:
cooperman
When: 24 Jan 18 14:18
Apparently it is against the law to promote a concert at which a disabled person cannot derive as much enjoyment as a non disabled person. The promoter was contacted in advance by the lady and failed to fulfil his legal requirement. I know it does sound crazy but he left himself open and will probably regret it.
By:
john92
When: 24 Jan 18 14:30
"reasonable adjustments" so it's as "close as possible" is the law. Eventually they got an interpreter for Little Mix which by the look of it took more trouble than it should have. To continue with legal action because of the support acts to me is really petty especially when they compare it to only "seeing the last 20 minutes of a film". Might be out of spite

The support acts themselves probably don't even know the words of their songs so is it reasonable for a sign expert to learn the lyrics in such short notice? Why not google them and print them off? It's giving 'equality' a bad name imo.
By:
Just Checking
When: 24 Jan 18 14:35
It really is a world gone mad. So do ALL bands have to do this? Pub bands?
Small rock and indy bands trying to make it?

Extreme Death metal bands, so someone has to stand at the side frantically signing about as someone growls (that nobody can make out anyway)
about "Satan sacrificing virgins with the heads of babies" or something?

And the news had yet another "someone gets a job so the snowflakes go through their entire twitter history to find something to get angry about".

When the **** is this crap going to get a backlash from the reasonable majority and stopped?
By:
saddo
When: 24 Jan 18 14:42
Won't be too long, as soon as the reasonable majority are forced into anger as a last resort.
By:
alun2005
When: 24 Jan 18 14:48
JC - I also saw that piece about Neville's tweets being forensically examined to see if there was one scintilla of evidence of him holding an 'incorrect' opinion, that would disqualify him from a job in Women's Football.

I'm guessing that if they'd found nothing, they'd have rounded up as many of his primary school chums as possible to see if he'd ever sang an inappropriate nursery rhyme.
By:
TELL DEL
When: 24 Jan 18 15:31
Very unreasonable woman, they provided an interpreter, and if I have read this right, her argument is they only signed for the main act, and did not sign the support acts. But they supplied what was asked for, an interpreter for the main billing, Little Mix. If that is right, the arrogance of this woman is amazing !
By:
Injera
When: 24 Jan 18 15:39
Entitlement Generation.
By:
charwell.
When: 24 Jan 18 18:24
They provided a sign specialist for the Little Mix, upgraded their seats, gave them access to private toilet, had electronic board for anything spoken etc. They pushed the boat out for the family.

Disgusting this 'claim' culture. Opportunists using a medical condition to extract money they are not due; despite the best efforts to accommodate them.
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 24 Jan 18 18:27
I hope they bill her for paperwork and time spent.
By:
saddo
When: 24 Jan 18 19:03
I hope some of her neighbours despise her.
By:
morpteh mackem
When: 24 Jan 18 19:45
surprised this complaint didnt fall on deaf ears
By:
geoff m
When: 24 Jan 18 19:51
saddo • January 24, 2018 7:03 PM GMT
I hope some of her neighbours despise her


They do saddo. theyve told her many times to no avail
By:
dustybin
When: 24 Jan 18 20:12
When I first saw the story I assumed the kid was deaf....but realised it was the mother who was.
Why the hell does a grown woman well into her 40-50s want to 'read' the sign language for the lyrics of a kid's group?

What about nightclubs then, are they liable to provide sign language to convey lyrics at those events too?
What about juke boxes in pubs?
Laugh
Everytime somebody puts a quid in the juke box the employed signer in every pub across the land has to get up and sign the lyrics?

Im embarrassed for the woman.
By:
bigmo
When: 24 Jan 18 22:13
Welcome to the world we are leaving to our grandchildren.
By:
akabula
When: 24 Jan 18 23:11
I hope you're at t5he wind up screaming.
Injera summed it up well. Entitlement Generation.
Feckin crazy law btw, buskers beware.
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 24 Jan 18 23:23
Nobody's suing a busker, or a jukebox owner, or a pub landlord.

It's four multi-millionaires, who charge 60 quid-plus per ticket, yet tried to get away with saving fifty quid by booking a signer for half the gig instead of the whole gig.

Look. If this mother were blind, the band would have done everything possible to help her - what a photo opportunity, with the dark glasses, the cuddly labrador and the kids.

But deafness? Nah. Deaf people just stand there looking stupid, don't they? Can't even get an interview out of 'em. Forget it. Nothing they can do about it, is there? Hah!
By:
akabula
When: 24 Jan 18 23:28
They provided a sign specialist for the Little Mix, upgraded their seats, gave them access to private toilet, had electronic board for anything spoken etc. They pushed the boat out for the family.

That's from Charwells post yet you say they didn't do anything for her.
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 24 Jan 18 23:42
They didn't push the boat out. They did the opposite. They tried to do it on the cheap by only hiring a signer for part of the gig, and pocketing the saving themselves a couple of hours of wages.
By:
lfc1971
When: 24 Jan 18 23:44
It's up to the artist to decide , no one else
sorry sfbtw
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 24 Jan 18 23:55
That's not what the law says though, lfc.

If you feel that accommodating disabled customers should not be a legal obligation, then campaign to change the law.

Leaving the legal aspect aside, I still can't get over how you all find yourselves aligning morally with the multi-millionaire stars from the Simon Cowell stable, and not the disabled mother and her family. Unless maybe you reckon it's not really a disability. And somehow, when her children want to talk about the gig, she'll be able magically to know what was going on at it.
By:
akabula
When: 25 Jan 18 00:00
I doubt the group would know anything about this.
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Jan 18 00:00
I didn't say people couldn't be there, if I was death I would still have wanted to go to concerts when I was younger
I wouldn't have missed that for anything . I wouldn't have wanted anything done to make me noticed
I like to be invisible
By:
saddo
When: 25 Jan 18 00:00
FFS, she's deaf, listening to a live band aint very practical, get over it.
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Jan 18 00:02
*deaf
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Jan 18 00:03
I disagree , I would not mind going to a concert , especially a rock or punk concert and being deaf
By:
akabula
When: 25 Jan 18 00:03
Despise Russell Brand but forced to steal one of his comments.
This woman is a poundshop Gina Miller. AngryLaugh
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Jan 18 00:03
If there was signage that would make it worse , not better
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Jan 18 00:04
I would go to se the band , and to be there
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Jan 18 00:12
rock music and a concert is very beautiful in that way , you don't have to hear the music
By:
saddo
When: 25 Jan 18 00:12
What's the point of seeing the lyrics a few seconds after the notes have sounded in yer heed?
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 25 Jan 18 00:19
@ Saddo:

How about paraplegics in wheelchairs complaining about no ramps on a pavement? Would you advise them to get over it? Leaving the house ain't very practical, after all.

What about blind people who get annoyed when audio description gets dropped from TV programmes without warning? What do you say? "Let's face it, TV's not very practical if you're blind; just accept you won't have a clue what your family, friends and the whole world are talking about, because TV isn't for you; you're disabled - you're not part of the world of us normal people."

Gigs are great, if you're deaf. You can enjoy the spectacle, the energy, the vibrations (literally). It's the one time you're almost part of the world everyone else enjoys. But it's still only "almost"; and that missing bit must be especially acute from the point of view of a deaf mother wanting to bring up her hearing children enjoying the same experiences children with hearing mothers do.
By:
lfc1971
When: 25 Jan 18 00:24
no there should be access for people in wheelchairs of course , that is a matter for the venue
By:
akabula
When: 25 Jan 18 00:25
Piling it on now screaming. Laugh
By:
saddo
When: 25 Jan 18 00:28
I have a damaged knee which hurts when I go on long walks. I would like to go walking without pain like other people, who should I sue?
By:
screaming from beneaththewaves
When: 25 Jan 18 00:29
The issue for the mother is not her enjoyment of the music: delays in interpreting what's happening don't matter. She just wants to be aware of what her children are experiencing, as any decent mother would.

Having said that, you do get used to the delays and errors in signing and subtitling. In some ways it makes the experience your own one.
Page 1 of 2  •  Previous 1 | 2 | Next
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com