Chit Chat
There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
100m - 12.9 seconds
200m - 27. 4 seconds
400m - 65.4 seconds
Bear in mind these were all ran within an hour when a bunch of us did it for a laugh and a bet. They might look slow times, but I reckon most would struggle to beat them.
200m - 27. 4 seconds
400m - 65.4 seconds
Bear in mind these were all ran within an hour when a bunch of us did it for a laugh and a bet. They might look slow times, but I reckon most would struggle to beat them.
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 10
|
By:
Not now but back in the day 11.80 for 100 metres, not too bad for a hooker. I'd struggle to break 15 seconds now on a going day with a following breeze.
 |
|
By:
No. But then again i am 60!!
|
|
By:
32-45 FOR 10K.....I am very proud of that.....I can just about Jog now though.
|
|
By:
When I was younger back at school my 200m time was better on average than my 100m time, I suppose I was either a slow starter or very fast and sustained finisher or the bloke on the clock hit the stop watch late at the start and early at the end....
 Either way it was something like 0.02 off the school record..  |
|
By:
100 m in 12.5 in 1984, my cousin was in scot' sprint team sub 10.5, i was always carrying weight?
never timed myself when i took up jogging from 1994 to 2003, no idea? |
|
By:
I'd easily beat your 400m time. If I was running 100m.
|
|
By:
5m - 10secs
|
|
By:
some decent sprinters on here i a marathon/snickers girl
|
|
By:
If I was a woman I'd have every world record from 1500m to Marathon.
Except that women have to carry more fat, have wider hips, lower testosterone to aid recovery, and tits so it's not really comparable. |
|
By:
bongo slut of the year
|