Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
STUDYFORM
26 Aug 17 21:14
Joined:
Date Joined: 26 Jan 05
| Topic/replies: 20,564 | Blogger: STUDYFORM's blog
I just watched an ad on TV, to adopt a Polar bear.
Then thought. How does the money help?
It doesn't really. Not in any really important, vital, meaningful way.
Yet the bosses of the charity (WWF) like so many others earns bundles from it.

A cap of £40,000 a year for ANYONE working for ANY charity should be enforced.

I have moaned about this subject before.
Charities are becoming big business and we should question how much real charity and true need to help is involved

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 17
By:
Hank Hill
When: 26 Aug 17 21:30
I agree Study. Many charities have far too much of a bloated budget that means too much money is not going directly toward the issue and/or research. Another thing that annoys me is when you stop giving to a certain charity they hound you for years after. There is one particular charity that keeps trying to get me to rejoin and wastes god knows how much on things to send to me to entice me. I think I stopped giving to them about 8 years ago Laugh
By:
DStyle
When: 26 Aug 17 22:46
According to charity navigator, in 2014, the Scottsdale League for the Arts, a charity supporting arts and arts education in Arizona, spent 98.5% of its income on fundraising and management costs.

The stats are all out there, in the UK (on a government maintained website), and in the states on Charity Navigator. I don't think salaries should be capped, but I do think every charity should be forced to prominently display their overhead costs as well as their sector's overhead costs, on every piece of fund-raising material they issue, at all fund raising events and making it mandatory for chuggers to verbally inform their prey prior to asking for someone to fill out a direct debit form.

The goal of all charitable organisations should be about maximising the amount of donated money that reaches the cause, not about the total funds raised.
By:
DStyle
When: 26 Aug 17 22:47
*their sector's average overhead costs
By:
Ramruma
When: 27 Aug 17 07:58
Trouble with that is that larger charities are likely to be more effective, even with greater overheads, than many small ones where everyone is working for nothing. Overheads are not the whole story.
By:
MadVlad
When: 27 Aug 17 10:57
I work for a IT company where if we pick up as requested some IT equipment for re-use or disposal the client gets costed £80 per visit. I had 6 different locations in Glasgow where I had collections.
Not one site had the said equipment ( I-Pads ) as the manager had forgot to arrange for my visit. So AFC got charged £480 for nothing now anyone fancy running a marathon for AFC ??
By:
bongo
When: 27 Aug 17 13:39
The Director of the RoH charity earns over £700k, and in my view is worth every penny, even though about 1/4 of RoH funding comes from Arts Council and a good portion of the rest from Gift Aid. The work his team has done bringing appreciation of the opera to schools is fantastic, and when older these children will show their appreciation back by voting for parties that endorse the continuation of these gifts from the general population.
By:
Ibrahima Sonko
When: 27 Aug 17 13:46
Most charities are a con, you would think people who work for them did it for free , being in an healthy financial position and working for free. I used to give money out of my monthly wages to charity, did a bit of research and 90% went on overheads.

Every advert should tell how much out of every pound reaches the target.
By:
Slicer
When: 27 Aug 17 13:46
Its like all these appeals to raise money for floods and drought in Africa and Asia. What the hull is foreign aid for. The money goes to the corrupt governments. I look forward to hearing how many donations are made by Bangla Desh and Ethiopia to the unfortunates in Texas suffering from the hurricane and floods!
By:
Jack Hacksaw
When: 27 Aug 17 14:54
Theres one local to me who were in the local rag requesting some free or cheap office space.

I looked at their accounts and about 80% went on staffing cost and only 20% to the reason for the charity...children something or other..
By:
Jack Hacksaw
When: 27 Aug 17 14:54
Theres one local to me who were in the local rag requesting some free or cheap office space.

I looked at their accounts and about 80% went on staffing cost and only 20% to the reason for the charity...children something or other..
By:
Jack Hacksaw
When: 27 Aug 17 14:58
Turnover £170k.  From that only £40k to the cause.

Proudly state no employee paid more than £14k (but most staff are part-time)

Scandalous.
By:
MadVlad
When: 27 Aug 17 16:12
^ Jack AFC = Action For Children my feckin arse !
By:
treetop
When: 27 Aug 17 17:33
Charities are also killing small traders on town high streets,operating without the same overheads many local shops bear. The sentiment is obviously good but the small towns are losing character shops that might offer clothing and toys,etc.
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 27 Aug 17 18:45
There was a charity shop next to one I used to own.
The charity was disbanded and taken off the list in 2009. Yet the shop still exists, as does the boot sales and ebay activity. Some of the stuff donated was amazing.
Furniture, Golf clubs, things from houses of the recently deceased as well as crap that people couldn't be bothered to chuck away.

Trading standards weren't bothered. The Charities commission said "it was outside thweir remit"!!!!!!
Yet another 'commission' or quango just providing jobs and wages for buddies of politicians.

But, for the larger charities, if you have a delve you can see their accounts online. They often make it a bit tricky but they have to state wage earners of £60k and over.

Last time I looked, cancer UK had 221 people earning over £60,000 a year.
Yet the operation's work is largely done by volunteers and the expenses are low.

Advertisers do well from charities. Bosses of charities do well from charities. Other than that they're a blight, imo.
By:
STUDYFORM
When: 27 Aug 17 18:46
*one I used to own = shop, not charity shop, btw.
By:
stewarty b
When: 27 Aug 17 19:27
I've donated my fair share to cancer research and a dementia charity. Nothing to be proud of but I always do it anonymously.
By:
stewarty b
When: 27 Aug 17 19:28
** I forgot to add that the reason for that is I don't want to be plagued by phone calls and texts.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com