Forums

We want to share an important update with our Betfair Community users.

Over the coming months, the Betfair Community platform will be winding down. The final active day for the platform will be December 21st. From December 22nd, users will no longer be able to access the platform.

Your discussions, insights, engagement, and, most importantly, feedback have helped shape the platform and guided innovation. Your feedback continues to be important to us, and we will continue to listen via our dedicated feedback channels, as well as through product testing and innovations.

To share your feedback and experience, visit: https://support.betfair.com/app/home

There is currently 1 person viewing this thread.
scandanavian_haven
07 Aug 17 23:13
Joined:
Date Joined: 27 May 11
| Topic/replies: 17,249 | Blogger: scandanavian_haven's blog
in other words, should tax and National Insurance payers who fund the NHS, be paying for infertile couples to have children ?

Personally I think it should be self funded, either way I don't think there should be a postcode lottery.

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
sort by:
Show
per page
Replies: 4
By:
saddo
When: 07 Aug 17 23:23
Lots of pregnant foreigners fly in 'on holiday' and have their children at our expense. I can't see people accepting limits on treating our own until this is stopped.
By:
lfc1971
When: 07 Aug 17 23:28
Professor Robert Winston was very rude to a nice young woman on newsnight tonight who said it shouldn't be.
By:
ufcdan
When: 08 Aug 17 09:24
My thoughts are that the age should be reduced for the treatment and for someone who wants to follow a career first, why should the NHS fund a forty year old woman ? Mind you what ever is decided the treatment should be uniform throughout Britain, if you get three goes in Scotland (no doubt thanks again to the Barnett formula) you should have the same opportunity and amount of chances throughout the rest of the U.K. We all pay the proportionally the same amount of tax and National Insurance.
By:
Jack Hacksaw
When: 08 Aug 17 09:45
Of course, not.  It's not a medical necessity.

If it wasn't carried out in hospitals, there would be no reason for it to be even considered to be paid for by the taxpayer.

The fact that is is unique in terms of procedures carried out by the NHS suggests something.

Ideal type of business to be handled by the private sector.
sort by:
Show
per page

Post your reply

Text Format: Table: Smilies:
Forum does not support HTML
Insert Photo
Cancel
‹ back to topics
www.betfair.com