Question Time

remember nearly all the people in this country depend on their job whether salaried consultant or refuse collecter

we are basically all only a few months away from fiscal disaster without a job

we are all working class if you follow that

pip pip!!!

part timer imo  - hope you don't have nightmares....... or is that the wrong programme

To have money is to be virtous, beautiful, honest and witty.
To have none is to be ugly and boring and stupid and useless.
Ragpicker – Madwoman of Chaillot.

I think it over 50% people are only ONE pay packet from bankruptcy, moisok, though I might be wrong.

Poles Moisok I don't think I am familiar with that Ale , whatever it seems to have sorted you out

Yes playing with words he he  Poles polls

and yes study I would not argue with that at all

What I was trying to point out is that overall most people are just workers almost regardless
of the amount they earn. Obviously the higher they go the more comfort but without that job they
are in trouble.

vote SNP get conservative in the rest of the country

Mrs May's skirt is wayyyyyyyyyyyyyy to short..silly woman

Audience member swearing during show @ 1.25 and shortening

where did they get these questioners ?

not the brightest

she's got herself into a terrible pickle.

Strange how lefties love inheritance tax, but hate the "dementia tax", which at the end of the day is pretty much a kind of inheritance tax?

Of course it is easy to have a poke at the incumbent/government. 
But she just doesn't come over that well.
Let's see how corby does in comparison.

not in line with inflation

we added a fiver on top - it's more money than we have ever spent.

ffs someone get her a chair

FK - a magic money tree.

chop it down, make it into paper, print some money.

If you are blind... can you put things in a box.

Money tree ... oh god that explains the swing in the polls doesn't it.

About 2 weeks ago, Money Tree must've put his bank on a Tory win.

She managed to find her way onto the front row.

Go along to an assessment and meet a robot?

they cannot go outside the guidelines.

there is no magic money tree? - we just borrowed a trillion from foreign countries in seven years. Replace the words 'foreign countries' with magic money tree.

dont answer questions ......

mention diane abbott

mention magic money tree

dont mention strong and stable, ....

I have completely switched off, Jesus Christ on a bike, modern politics/campaigning is dire.

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:10PM, pan07 wrote:

all you tory voting slags are complicit we the murder of the manchester 22

1592 posts in 11 years, thank God for that, I hope nobody affected by terrorism reads that gutter level trash.

**** off weak and wobbly the  truth hurts u vile ****

corby winds  already

wins

Looks Jezzer and the audience arrived in the same coach.

corbyns face is lop sided. A bit Patrick Moore. Look at his eyebrows.

Has he spent a lot of time looking at a telescope? At Diane Abbotts bedroom?

QUESTION TIME  now renamed DIMBLEBY ASKS THE QUESTIONS

Corbyn is NOT ruling out a deal with Sturgeon.

He's just "not looking". I hope the media get him for that. He's leaving the door 4 foot open.

HE ANSWERED THE QUESTION SHOCK HORROR!!!

Yes, Dimbleby asked a lot of questions himself of May in a sarcastic manner.

Corbyn didn't answer the question about sturgeon, he could have just said he'd rule a deal out. He didn't, he very specifically didn't.

yes I thought so too

ok  don't lose your wig

corby polling 65 percent

I don't have a wig. It's called a Merkin.

Whig,??

you can't take the council house out of the bouy foxy  I am betrayed - I now have no credibility - I am undone - how cruel you have become!!!

this is thin gruel is it not?

Mea culpa, sorry, please give me a 2,116th chance, thanks in advance.

Fantasy politics.

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:27PM, moisok wrote:

this is thin gruel is it not?

I'm turned off by the whole thing, anyone else????.

Pipe down Corbyn, no one in Britain wants to go to school at the age of 25.
That will solve nothing.

Just for Balance - Theresa May looks like Blakey (google Theresa may and Blakey)
Corbyn is answering questions much more fully than May did.

He also finished the Sturgeon question with an answer "No Deals".

We all see what we want to see.

You are too far away from me to make you a cuppa  - sorry and all that.

tories  have caused the housing crisis

His answer was a mealy mouthed "we intend to win" "we are not looking to make deals" to a direct question WILL YOU RULE OUT MAKING DEALS.

He could have done that with one word. "Yes". Or a sentence "Yes I will rule out any deals". He did not.

Yep, they have.
They own all the empty houses and charge mega rents for them.

I'm outta here, losing the will to live.

we are a 'multi lingual' society - did I hear that right??  I thought English was our language.!??

Corbyn storming it ....Twitter knows !

Blind hatred of the bloke from the day he got the job as leader (twice) is unjustified and set up by the media.
Not productive.

http://www.thelondoneconomic.com/news/politics/facebook-comment-jeremy-corbyn-going-viral/31/05/

This was quite good in my (not for the blind faith tories though).

He said "no deal"

Wondering why you're getting yourself worked up.

Corbyn hasn't answered one question directly.

I know why i like him (apart from being a party member)   HE IS A TREE HUGGER LIKE ME!!!!!

In case this is your first day listening to a politicians, and it appears to be the case, when they want to leave doors open, they say things like "we are not looking to". This is probably the favourite phrase of a politicians who wants to push opinion one way but not rule out doing the very thing they are "not looking to do". It's textbook. HTH.

Some people will never concede Corbyn EVER has a point about anything, PorP.
On this forum there is a belief among many that May can do no wrong.

Corbyn has answered every question. Except he won't lie!

We must be watching different programmes,

So many people want to use nukes.

What would be the point in retaliatory bombing - we'd all be dead?
What would be the point in 1st use. we'd be retaliated against, we'd all be dead

I've watched this with the sound down and I think Corbyn is slightly ahead.

That's cos he's lop-sided and doesn't look like Blakey, Velasquez.

What did he kick off at 8 or 9 to 1 or more?  - must have been a good back and then a trade out??

You have to have an automatic retaliation system or the Nuclear weapons would not be a deterrent.

he is spot on about the training

He might not look like Blakey but he does look like Steptoe...

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:43PM, moisok wrote:

What did he kick off at 8 or 9 to 1 or more?

10

Corbin is uneasy he's taking a hammering

On Daily Politics today they said something like 2/3 of those polled who were on zero hour contracts were happy to be on them?

I suggest you check Twitter or any other top trends Baboon

Twitter suggests he's taking a hammering too

That poll/statement has to be BS, JC.
Would YOU want to be on zero-hour?
I wouldn't, don't know anyone who would or who does.

5.9 to lay  as PM if I have the right market 'prime minister after election'

Really which twitter page you looking at?

Just look at #BBC QT

Anyway, we all see what we want to see.

I happily worked zero hour contracts for years. Most of the people who complain about them are guardian reading or trade union idiots, as usual taking offence for other people. Righteous posturing from snowlakes.

Wait a minute, just read what you said again "I wouldn't, don't know anyone who would or who does.". Well thank you, you 100% proved my point.

Looks like quite a few of the audience want to blow up the world.  Apologies for being a flake.

I didn't realise we're at war. Yikes!

Jun 2, 2017 -- 3:18PM, Just Checking wrote:

corbyns face is lop sided. A bit Patrick Moore. Look at his eyebrows.Has he spent a lot of time looking at a telescope? At Diane Abbotts bedroom?

torys wanna nuke every ****. desperate

Dimbleby doesn't appear to be doing his lengthy questions to Corbyn in a patronising manner that he did to May, or did I miss it?

A leftie wanting a leftie education for everyone free, whatever next.

Fortunately, your point is - as always - unbending and self righteous. JC

Now starts the BBC is biased stuff (again), right?

I am proud and pleased to say that I have never read anything you've posted which I can agree with.
Thankfully, I'm not alone, you and the rest of the collective can carry on rubbing each other up the right way on here away from people who do thinking.

Use of copied pseudo insults like snowflakes prove MY point.
FYI (not that take in any information, you already know it all) I have never read the Guardian, nor belonged to a Trade union.

Speaking purely as a neutral I'd say May won that 9-0.

About as neutral as the people with their questions.

So you say you know absolutely NO PEOPLE on a zero hour contract, then that you know what the people on them think about them and how happy they are?

The point of Nukes is stalemate. You say you will use them but you never do.

The trouble with JC is he said he would not use them. That's music to the ears of any enemy now and in the years ahead.

And some peeps want him to negotiate Brexit??

Zero hours was another poor planted question.


Wouldn't it be amazing to discover that students managed to get by with part time jobs before zero hours contracts. Really, it happened.



The issue with zero hours is the utter abuse of them. My firm uses them but we do it properly. Again, it's effectively a part time contract. Problem is when you get the sheer exploitation of staff as we've seen happen more and more. This is why you can't have nice things etc. If corporations can't be trusted to do it properly and abuse the law then the government needs to step in and correct it.

OK - To qualify, none of my mates/family are on them, but I speak to unhappy people who are, delivery drivers, warehouse pickers/packers.
They aren't happy.

Still, lets turn this into a New York soap type courtroom, eh?

Injera, the sort of nutters who would use nukes couldn't give a fig about their own or any other nation's people.
Our possession of them wouldn't make them any less nutters.

corbyn wobbled like may when nukes were mentioned.
what a world we live in. last throw of the dice by the scum

The trouble with JC is he said he would not use them. That's music to the ears of any enemy now and in the years ahead.


Utter balls. So the only reason we haven't been bombed is because we might bomb them back? Just how many countries in the world don't have nuclear weapons. And how many of them have been attacked?

PorP quite right.
It IS the abuse of the same firms who escape tax, who can afford to squeeze out opposition, of zero-hours contracts as company policy.
The way wages are seen as a necessary evil and not a way of rewarding those who make the money for them.

Boris and that Geordie dude after was a bit lively.
Boris acts like a right cont every time I see him.

both kept their fans happy

That's not what I said PP. It's a deterent. We say we will use them but we don't.

See Pakistan and India. As for conparing us with non nuclear countries that's a total misunderstanding of our role in world politics.

Plod and the armed forces play a similar role in deterring crime. Do we scrap the Old Bill and negotiate with criminals or do we threaten them with chase, capture and punishment?

Please get real.

The NEW Trident has 140 warheads where one warhead has the capabilty 8 times that of Hiroshama

You can't compare us and N Korea/Iran to Pakistan and India.


How long have we had nuclear weapons for? 50 years or so? How many nuclear attacks have non-nuclear armed countries suffered in that time compared to the likes of us who can send another one back?


Just how do the likes of Canada, Italy, Germany etc possibly hope to defend themselves if they don't have the bomb do you think?


If we were to abandon Trident would Iran suddenly say "right, now we can bomb them"?


It's absolute nonsense.

I can't get my head around the nuclear argument.
Do people honestly think that an aggressor would chance their arm with a nuclear country simply because they once heard a sound bite that said they wouldn't use em?

So they play high risk poker risking it all on the comment of a bloody politician?
Get real, what happens when they receive a nuke anyway in response?
They gunna turn around and say 'but he said he wouldnt'?